Sunday, February 24, 2019

2018 Cinema & Stadium Film Year-in-Review


2018 Cinema & Stadium Film Year-in-Review

I am always excited for this annual opportunity to look back at the previous calendar year in film.  Writing this post makes me experience these movies again - not just by looking back at my review from the first time around, but trying to call back the way I felt when I saw them.  The passage of time often results in surprises in what stands out in my memory, and I usually have at least a small shift in my overall opinion.  I smashed my personal record for movies seen in the theater this year, so there will be a lot to remember.  Glancing at the list, it looks like it was another strong year overall - as usual, most of what I saw was in either the action/adventure or drama genres, although I saw more comedies this year than last.

As a reminder, I count only films that were released in theaters near me (i.e., rural area) in 2018 so you'll find some films here that were in last year's Oscars.  The format of my year-in-review is the same as always, celebrating the good, the bad, and everything in between:
  • Top 10 films of the year
  • Most underrated/overrated films
  • Most surprising/disappointing films
  • Worst film of the year
  • Second chance: films I saw on Netflix
  • List of other films I saw and reviewed
Please do also check out my Oscar-style awards for 2018 post here, and all of the films listed below are linked so you can jump to my full reviews if/when you're interested.  Enjoy!


Top 10 Films of 2018

10 (tie).  The Post (Directed by Steven Spielberg; starring Meryl Streep, Tom Hanks, Bob Odenkirk)

The Post's trio of Spielberg-Streep-Hanks is a movie lover's dream, and it is indeed a great one, even if it doesn't quite meet my (very) lofty expectations.  This is the story of the Post's decision whether to publish the classified Pentagon Papers, containing explosive revelations on the Vietnam War.  The paper fights a classic underdog battle, and wisely focuses not on Hanks's grizzled, confrontational editor but on Streep's underestimated owner.  She is the film's heart and soul, creating a vivid, complex character with both courage and insecurities.  The Post doesn't dig as deep or hit as hard as its cousin, Spotlight, but it's still an entertaining and important film.

10 (tie).  Widows (Directed by Steve McQueen; starring Viola Davis, Elizabeth Debicki, Cynthia Erivo, Michelle Rodriguez)

With all due respect to the fun-as-hell Ocean's franchise, this is about as good a heist film as I've ever seen.  Largely, that's because the heist aspect is essentially a vehicle for fascinating explorations of women bursting out of their husbands' shadows and bleak but illuminating political machinations.  Viola Davis leads the charge, devastated by her husband's sudden death but immediately forced to fight for survival.  She soon rounds up her fellow widows, mutually suspicious but capable of more than they imagine.  Meanwhile, Farrell haunts as a dynasty heir in an unforgettable city tracking shot while his disadvantaged rivals turn ruthless.  Add the heist itself, and it truly hits the jackpot.

9.  Vice (Directed by Adam McKay; starring Christian Bale, Amy Adams, Steve Carell)

I'm not afraid to confront the obvious political stigma it bears in my choice: regardless of all that, it's a cleverly constructed story fronted by outstanding performances.  Christian Bale is the latest in a line of top-flight actors (Oyelowo, Oldman, etc.) to slip into a historical icon's skin and soul; physical transformation and mannerisms amazing, subtle inner life just as good.  Adams and Carell as wife Lynne and Rumsfeld, respectively, are also to be praised as they show the nuanced, complex ways their relationships shaped Dick.  It's well-written, a thorough but well-paced journey to the crucial 9/11 pivot point, after which it allows itself a full-throated condemnation.

8.  Game Night (Directed by John Francis Daley; starring Jason Bateman, Rachel McAdams, Kyle Chandler)

One of the funniest comedies I've seen in years, I'm kicking myself that I didn't see this in the theater. Just about everything in it is unexpected, from an odd assortment of actors to a tone that somehow careens from goofy to straight to dark without feeling out of place.  Bateman as usual is a superb comic lead, and helps the less humor-centric players like McAdams and Chandler hit their stride; though it's little-known Jesse Plemons who is the so-bizarre-he's-hilarious scene stealer.  It has some genuine spooks, but it knows just how to play the horror and other genre bits for maximum humor.  Very well-written and never predictable, this Game Night is worthy of an encore.

7.  Roma (Directed by Alfonso Cuaron; starring Yalitza Aparicio, Marina de Tavira)

I'm usually not on the lookout for deliberately-paced foreign language films, but this Netflix original from one of Hollywood's best directors is entertaining and moving to go with its artsiness.  Based on Cuaron's childhood, the focus is the family's maid who is played brilliantly by the acting novice Aparicio.  Filmed in black and white, it really does feel like a memory playing out.  The first half sets the stage, most often simply following quiet Cleo around the home as she washes the floors or looks after the children.  Well done, but frankly a bit slow with little narrative so breaking it into multiple viewings is recommended.  By the end, however, the investment pays off as the story picks up.

6.  First Man (Directed by Damien Chazelle; starring Ryan Gosling, Claire Foy, Kyle Chandler)

Much of this fascinating Neil Armstrong biopic is about its subject's inner, suppressed tempest, but it also thrills when it shows that man bring the chaos of space to heel - by the thinnest of margins.  Gosling, rejoining La La Land's Chazelle, is far more reserved yet focused this time.  First Man explores him - how personal trauma drove professional brilliance and landed back in the home again - more so than the moon landing itself.  While his colleagues become like family, the strain with his real one culminates in a wrenching pre-launch farewell.  And in several space scenes, you're placed right in the cramped, rattling pods, hanging on for dear life.  An adventure, inside and out.

5.  Mission Impossible: Fallout (Directed by Christopher McQuarrie; starring Tom Cruise, Henry Cavill, Rebecca Ferguson)

Typically, by the time an action franchise reaches its sixth film - and its star's 56th birthday - you don't expect much that is either new or better than what you've seen before.  Well, Cruise and Co. turned all that on its head with the latest Mission Impossible.  Previous entries have seen one death-defying practical stunt each; this one has at least three, and they're all jaw dropping.  Most impressive are the ludicrously long car- and motorcycle chase through Paris, and the helicopter finale.  There are also some great fight scenes, and the humor is even more a relief here to catch your breath.  Bonus intrigue for those who saw the previous one, but if you didn't catch this in the theater, you missed out.

4.  Can You Ever Forgive Me?  (Directed by Marielle Heller; starring Melissa McCarthy, Richard E. Grant)

This little biopic defies just about every rule in Hollywood in quietly becoming one of the best dramas of the year.  Melissa McCarthy, hilarious but also a tremendously talented (if underestimated) overall actor, delivers a brilliant performance.  Lee Israel, a failed writer who turns to literary forgery to get by - and also to give her peers the finger - is a peevish misanthrope.  Yet McCarthy is so devoted, and the screenplay helps give her such depth, that she is sympathetic nonetheless.  Grant's street scoundrel is a perfect foil and the story itself is fascinating: Lee's actions may be criminal, but there's plenty of shadiness to be found elsewhere, too.  See it at home when you can.

3.  Black Panther (Directed by Ryan Coogler; starring Chadwick Boseman, Michael B. Jordan, et. al.)

Among the first superhero films to court major awards buzz, Black Panther is not only a top-tier example of its genre but it also creates a rich fictional world that has plenty to say about our own.  At its center is the fantasy country of Wakanda, a striking inverse of historical pattern: using powerful alien material, it has become by far the most advanced culture in the world, but hides and isolates itself.  The production design is dazzling and immersive, from gleaming cities and industry to vibrant fashion and customs.  Boseman quietly bears the weight of the world is on his shoulders: newly crowned, he confronts both his nation's tradition as well as a fierce and charismatic rival.  And the complex female roles steal the show on top of it all.  A landmark film in many ways.

2.  Molly's Game (Directed by Aaron Sorkin; starring Jessica Chastain, Idris Elba)

Aaron Sorkin's incredible writing finds a perfect muse in Jessica Chastain - whose acting is strong enough to shoulder the technical demands but also to give it a warm, beating heart.  Based on a true story, Molly's life as an Olympic skier turned underground poker manager is so full of complex, amazing detail that only Sorkin's vibrant, rapid-fire yet comprehensible writing could capture it.  Chastain is a chameleon on screen, but playing a bold, determined heroine is her sweet spot and she just cranks this part out of the park.  Elba and Costner provide some emotional fireworks, but it's Chastain who does the heavy lifting, often without even speaking - a true trick from Sorkin.  From its incredibly entertaining and moving story to the crackling writing to Chastain, you can't miss it.

1.  Avengers: Infinity War (Directed by Anthony and Joe Russo; starring Robert Downey, Jr., Chris Hemsworth, Josh Brolin, et. al.)

In case you hadn't noticed, I'm a bit of a fan of the Marvel superhero movies.  It's not everyone's thing and frankly, even most people who do enjoy these films wouldn't put Infinity War at the top of their list for 2018.  But damn it, I've enjoyed the MCU ever since Iron Man back in 2008 and have only enjoyed and respected it more since then.  For fans like me, Infinity War is an immensely gratifying culmination of a ten-year saga, filled with both exhilarating joy and gripping suspense.  Quite often, my top movie of the year is one I consider to have had a high degree of difficulty in achieving any kind of success, let alone mastery.  Infinity War most definitely qualifies: not only does it have an insane number of characters to juggle (well over 30 make at least an appearance), but it's only part one of two of a saga finale without peer (in its overall scope) in film history.  It handles these challenges gracefully, thanks to the dynamic creative duo of Anthony and Joe Russo (who also helmed MCU standouts Captain America: Winter Soldier and CA: Civil War).  There's plenty of exposition and character meetings, which typically are murder for a film's pacing (not least one that's 2.5 hours) - so they amp up the humor and energy as high as possible, made possible by the extraordinary casting and chemistry among the heroes built up over the years.  On top of this rock solid frame is laid plentiful action, which is spread out, varied and then escalated appropriately so that by the end rather than exhausted, you are charged for the conclusion - a cliffhanger that leaves you hanging in all (and the best possible) ways.

Do I recommend this to simply anyone?  No.  But for those of us who have followed and enjoyed the Marvel superhero films of the past decade, there was simply no greater experience to be had at the movie theater in 2018.

Honorable mentions:  The Old Man & the Gun; BlackKklansman; Tag; Solo: A Star Wars Story


Miscellaneous Awards:

Most Overrated Film of the Year:  Bohemian Rhapsody (runner-up: Deadpool 2)
I enjoyed the first Deadpool a lot: its irreverent tone, even how it sends up my favorite genre.  But this sequel makes the whole vibe already feel tired.  There's just more of everything, but nothing is better (although the jump scene with X-Force was hilarious).  There may still be life in this mini-franchise, but they need to pull back a lot and not just throw everything at the wall.
Bohemian Rhapsody actually does not have a great Rotten Tomatoes score, at 61%.  But it has a Best Picture nomination at the Oscars and won at the Golden Globes.  How either of these things happened, I have no idea.  Yes, Malek is good, and some of the show scenes are well done.  But it's such a cliched rock biopic movie, and the band's history is exaggerated if not entirely altered whenever needed to fit the desired narrative arc.  It's not bad, but not at all worthy of the awards attention it's received.

Most Underrated Film of the Year:  Solo: A Star Wars Story (runner-up: Tag)
Critics weren't game for Tag, giving it just a 56%; though it opened to a soft $15 million, word-of-mouth got it to a respectable $56 million total.  This is not the smartest comedy in the world.  But once you get past that, the sheer nuttiness of the premise and willingness of the cast sweeps you up.  Give this a try, and before long you'll be looking to tag others to its charms.
Solo got a decent critical reception, at 70%, but audiences abandoned it: after the previous three SW films broke box office records, this one got a "paltry" $213 million.  Maybe it was due to coming so soon after Episode VIII - which itself was controversial among the diehards.  Personally, I enjoyed this one more than the other offshoot film, Rogue One.  Ehrenreich makes a perfectly good Han, and its gritty, Indiana Jones-like vibe is a welcome change up.  Give it a chance.

Most Disappointing Film of the Year:  A Wrinkle in Time (runner-up: Jurassic World 2)
I probably shouldn't be surprised (and therefore, disappointed) that Jurassic World 2 wasn't very good.  The series "reboot" in 2015 was very entertaining but also a broad, dumbed-down product that happened to be executed quite well.  Sure, there are some exciting scenes here, but we're now quite far from the masterful original.  Good for the (older) kiddies, otherwise skip.
I read the classic children's book years ago in school, so I re-read it right before it came to theaters.  I'm glad I did read it again, because it's a great book, but the film is a flimsy adaptation, with shockingly little genuine wonder or resonance.  Granted, it is a titanic challenge, and the story demands so much from the reader's imagination that one film couldn't hope to satisfy everyone.  My advice: just stick to the book.

Most Surprisingly Good Film of the Year:  Crazy Rich Asians (runner-up: Tomb Raider)
Movies based on video games likely have the worst reputation in Hollywood, and deservedly so.  But I just had a feeling about this one, and was glad that I tried it.  Oscar winner Alicia Vikander carries it, a sympathetic street urchin early and then quite a believable action star - less fighting, and more thrilling stunts that you can almost feel yourself.  Try it when you need solid, fun adventure.
Rom-com is only slightly ahead of horror for me in the genres I am likely to see (in other words - few and far between).  But with so much hype, and an intriguing premise, I decided to give it a try.  Not earth-shattering, but it's quite entertaining, and quietly revolutionary in some ways.  The leads are charismatic, and there are a number of good supporting players (particularly Awkwafina and Nico Santos).  A feel-good celebration, even for non-rom-com fans.

Worst Film of the Year:  The Spy Who Dumped Me (runner-up: Life of the Party)
Melissa McCarthy has several times lifted up poor material into decent films.  No such luck with this loser about a mom going back to college with her daughter (it has every single horrible cliche and bashes your skull in with them).  It's especially shocking to see this in the same year that she was so good in Can You Ever Forgive Me?  For the love of God, someone please find a half-decent comedy writer for Melissa!!!
The premise for this - the girlfriend (and her girlfriend) of a spy going on a deadly mission, featuring a talented lead duo - was too much to resist.  Rotten Tomatoes tried to warn me (I think it was around 35% when it came out; somehow it's now up to 49%?!?).  This movie starts bad, and if anything only gets worse.  The filmmakers should probably be put on suspension - awful writing and directing.  Kate McKinnon improvises like crazy - whether because they asked her to or she just dumped the script, who knows - but even she comes up flailing.  It's pretty obvious this is a date movie, but anyone who took their loved one to see this is probably now single.


Netflix Summary:

  • BlackKklansman (A-):  Not sure why/how I didn't see this in theaters.  Based on an incredible true story of a black detective infiltrating the KKK - with his Jewish partner - it has good humor and unforced significance.  Highly recommended.
  • Tully (B+):  Theron is great as a mom at - and beyond - her breaking point.  It effectively shows real pain and struggles, though I'm iffy on the twist at the end.
  • Eighth Grade (B+):  Yet another coming-of-age story, this one distinguishes itself by the young actor's skill and almost painful realism.  Doesn't have a lot going for it otherwise, but decent.
  • The Death of Stalin (B):  If you're a fan of a certain kind of satire, you'll love this.  I'm not, so while I respect some of the cleverness and acting, it got old for me pretty quickly.
  • A Quiet Place (B):  I don't get the hype on this one.  It's fine, and Blunt is great, but it seems pretty standard sci-fi/horror fare to me.  Plus, the ending is kind of lame.
  • Blockers (B-):  Solid premise, but the execution is mediocre.  It struggles to create consistent laughs, and goes overly crude at times while overly hesitant at others.
  • Annihilation (B-):  I should probably just stop seeing this kind of weird sci-fi film.  I respect the tone and imagery, and it's quite spooky, but it's just too weird for me, especially Natalie Portman wrestle her alien doppelganger.


Other Films I Saw in Theaters in 2018 (click for full reviews):

I hope you enjoyed reading some or all of this year-in-review (and come back later if you're in need of movie night suggestions)!  I'm looking forward to some more great times at the theater in 2019 - I am counting down the days until two series finales in particular in Avengers: Endgame and Star Wars Episode IX.  I'm sure there will be plenty more worth seeing on the big screen, known hits and pleasant surprises alike.  Enjoy!!



* Image source:  https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4154756/mediaviewer/rm1947159040

2018 Cinema & Stadium Film Awards



2018 Cinema & Stadium Film Awards

While I generally like to write about whole movies, I also like to take the opportunity each year to recognize what I thought were the most outstanding individual accomplishments (plus, like many people, I like to share where I think the Oscars were right - and wrong).  As in previous years, there are two "rules" which make my awards a bit different from what you'll see at the Oscars:

  1. Only films released widely in 2018 are eligible (this is getting murkier each year, so another way to put it: whichever year it came out in my theater is the year I'm sticking it, so certain films often have to "wait" a year), and 
  2. Only films that I've actually seen are eligible.  
I'll note who the Academy Award nominees are for each category, too, and when there are differences it's often because of one or both of those rules.

Please also check out my companion post, where I count down my top 10 films of the year and dish out other "awards".  I hope you enjoy, and please feel free to let me know your own opinions!

Winners in bold
Runners-up underlined


Best Actress
Yalitza Aparicio (Roma)
*Jessica Chastain (Molly's Game)
Viola Davis (Widows)
Sally Hawkins (The Shape of Water)
Melissa McCarthy (Can You Ever Forgive Me?)
Meryl Streep (The Post)

2019 Oscar nominees not listed: Glenn Close (The Wife), Lady Gaga (A Star Is Born) - didn't see films; Olivia Colman (The Favourite) - film released in calendar 2019

This is possibly the best collection of performances I've seen from actresses in a single year; I must admit, I often simply don't go see the movies that showcase the best female performances.  Even after adding a sixth spot to recognize this, I left plenty of strong ones off the list, from those in physical, action roles (Alicia Vikander, Tomb Raider) to comedy (Constance Wu, Crazy Rich Asians).  I chose Jessica Chastain as my winner partly because she's one of my favorite actresses, and because the role offered such a variety of challenges.  But really, any of these performances are fully worthy of an Oscar win, and each one is so distinct.  That's why I don't have a runner-up - they're all winners.


Best Actor
*Christian Bale (Vice)
Tom Cruise (Mission Impossible: Fallout)
Ryan Gosling (First Man)
Rami Malek (Bohemian Rhapsody)
Robert Redford (The Old Man & the Gun)

2019 Oscar nominees not listed:  Bradley Cooper (A Star Is Born), Willem Dafoe (At Eternity's Gate) - didn't see the films; Viggo Mortensen (Green Book) - eligible but chose not to nominate

A very solid group of acting performances, even if they're overshadowed by the women this year.  While Cruise's is not a typical "Oscar" performance, I have to give him a nod for what is practically (in multiple senses) the ultimate action role.  Malek does a great job, though a bit overrated; meanwhile, Redford and particularly Gosling were snubbed by the Academy.  No one can touch Christian Bale this year, though, in what feels like a sequel to last year's award.  Like Oldman as Churchill, Bale's transformation - physical and interior - into his subject is just jaw-dropping.


Best Supporting Actress
Amy Adams (Vice)
Cynthia Erivo (Bad Times at the El Royale)
Claire Foy (First Man)
*Danai Gurira/Lupita Nyong'o/Letitia Wright (Black Panther)
Anne Hathaway (Ocean's 8)
Sissy Spacek (The Old Man & the Gun)

2019 Oscar nominees not listed:  Regina King (If Beale Street Could Talk) - didn't see the film; Emma Stone, Rachel Weisz (The Favourite) - film released in calendar 2019; Marina de Tavira (Roma) - eligible but chose not to nominate

I only have one overlapping nomination, but still feel that this year's roster is extremely strong (like the lead women, I gave an extra nod).  This category does have some intriguing comparisons; Hathaway and Spacek add mischievous spice to their films, while Adams and Foy are incredibly strong spouses of the male leads.  Erivo is a revelation, too.  While the Oscars would never bend their rules this way, I can do whatever I want, so I'm handing the win to Black Panther's amazing trio of women - without whom the film would be a shell of the triumph it is.


Best Supporting Actor
Josh Brolin (Avengers: Infinity War)
Steve Carell (Vice)
*Richard E. Grant (Can You Ever Forgive Me?)
Michael B. Jordan (Black Panther)
Jesse Plemons (Game Night)

2019 Oscar nominees not listed:  Sam Elliott (A Star Is Born) - didn't see the film; Mahershala Ali (Green Book), Adam Driver (BlackKklansman), Sam Rockwell (Vice) - eligible but chose not to nominate

This might be the most I've ever diverged from the parallel Oscar category in acting.  I totally agree on Richard E. Grant, in fact think that he should win, for his unique and inspired role in an otherwise badly overlooked film.  Ali and Driver were good, but to me, not quite good enough.  Instead, I'm giving the nod to two of the MCU's best villains to date.  Rockwell clearly benefits from recency bias as he won the award last year, but Carell's performance in the same film is superior.  Finally, Plemons' gonzo role in Game Night also deserves recognition.


Best Director
Ryan Coogler (Black Panther)
David Lowery (The Old Man & the Gun)
Steve McQueen (Widows)
*Anthony and Joe Russo (Avengers: Infinity War)
Aaron Sorkin (Molly's Game)

2019 Oscar nominees not listed:  Pawel Pawlikowski (Cold War) - didn't see the film; Yorgos Lanthimos (The Favourite) - film released in calendar 2019; Alfonso Cuaron (Roma), Spike Lee (BlackKklansman), Adam McKay (Vice) - eligible but chose not to nominate

This category is a little tricky for me to decide who is most worthy; usually, I look at degree of difficulty for the movie being successful, and a good balancing of the various elements (tone, pacing, performances, etc.).  Well, Infinity War definitely meets the criteria for degree of difficulty, so the guys in charge win for me.  I'd also like to note that both The Old Man & the Gun and Widows feel like they could have ended up badly if not for a strong director at the helm.


Best Screenplay
Liz Hannah, Josh Singer (The Post)
Nicole Holofcener, Jeff Whitty (Can You Ever Forgive Me?)
Adam McKay (Vice)
Mark Perez (Game Night)
*Aaron Sorkin (Molly's Game)

There are some absolutely brilliant contenders for writing this year.  Sorkin, one of the best writers out there, took his game to a whole new level so he takes the prize.  Can You Ever Forgive Me? edges the others because of its balance of humor and pathos, but the other three are all knockouts, too (in particular, Hollywood comedy writers: please take regular lessons from Perez.  PLEASE!!!)

Best Visual Effects
Ant-Man and the Wasp
Aquaman
*Avengers: Infinity War
Fantastic Beasts: Crimes of Grindelwald
Ready Player One



* By Source (WP:NFCC#4), Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=43704847

Saturday, February 23, 2019

Roma


Score:  A-

Directed by Alfonso Cuaron
Starring Yalitza Aparicio and Marina de Tavira
Running time: 135 minutes
Rated R

Long Story Short:  Roma is an intensely personal, small-scale film for the director of such hits as Harry Potter (#3) and Gravity.  It focuses on a family based on Cuaron's own childhood, centered especially on the maid/nanny who is played beautifully by acting novice Aparicio.  The first half is rather slow though vivid in its portrait of the family, before increasing the narrative and emotional stakes in a powerful but still realistic second half.  Highly recommended.


Cleo Gutierrez (Aparicio) is a live-in maid and nanny to a Mexican family in the early 1970s.  Sofia (de Tavira) and her mother run the household as her husband flits in and out of the home.  It is the children, three boys and a girl, who Cleo knows and loves the best, rousing them from bed each morning, preparing meals, and gently breaking up their sibling squabbles.  Her peaceful but uneventful life swerves into turmoil, however, as she is courted by a young man, joins the family on a strained holiday getaway, and witnesses the violence of civil unrest.  Life is change; a strong soul, Cleo will both be changed by her world as well as exert her influence on those around her.

Roma has a small cast of native Mexican actors, led by a revelatory performance from a newcomer.  Yalitza Aparicio plays Cleo, the lead in the film who is in nearly every frame - and she had never acted before.  Regardless of her lack of experience, Aparicio does a phenomenal job as the quiet but dedicated and compassionate maid and nanny.  The naturalism of the film's style, and her role in particular, may have actually made the inexperience an advantage: much of her acting is literally doing work around the house, interacting with others in a caring yet minimalistic way.  But she also does outstanding work in the more dramatic, emotional moments, coming off just as believable (and heartbreakingly so).  Marina de Tavira, who is a professional actor, gets the main supporting role as the matriarch of the home, Sofia.  While the focus rarely strays from Cleo, Marina asserts herself in crucial moments, and her importance to the family - in a strange but lovely duet with Cleo - rises throughout.  Like any well-developed character, she illustrates both Sofia's vulnerabilities, as she feels increasingly isolated, as well as her strength, in pulling her family - and herself - through adversity.  The child actors do quite well, too: each distinctive, and very much wonderfully unpredictable creatures while not getting in the way, acting-wise, of the main players.

Roma is a warm, intimate film, full of lasting images and moments both of quiet contemplation and searing emotion.  The story is based on writer and director Alfonso Cuaron's own childhood growing up in Mexico, and particularly his fondness and respect for his family's own Cleo-like figure.  It is shot in black and white though with modern digital technology, producing the look and feel of a vivid memory.  The movie's first half is its most naturalistic, taking its time in showing the daily life of the family, though at the same time setting the narrative stage of the family's absent father and Cleo's full (limited) social circle.  The opening credits play over a shot of a single area of tiled garage, soapy water splashing as Cleo washes somewhere offscreen; it reminded me of the calm, beautiful start to The Revenant and its gorgeous, trickling winter stream.  This is good preparation for the somewhat meandering first half, which is highlighted by Cleo's relationships with the children, singing quietly to them in bed or lying in the sun together on the roof.  While it's all well done, this does start to drag as it takes over an hour of the two hour, fifteen minute run time.  The second half is where more of a narrative comes in, based mostly on Cleo's pregnancy and the departure of the father.  It sprinkles in historic events on the periphery, for context.  Thanks to Aparicio and de Tavira's fine performances, the heights - Cleo's selfless protection of the children on a beach - and depths - tragedy in chaotic circumstances - carry great weight.  Yet the film remains naturalistic, a memory, as the final scene shows Cleo silently carrying on - literally, carrying laundry to the roof - even after the all the momentous events of the past year we just witnessed.

***

Roma is a great film, and noteworthy in its production and distribution as well.  Roma was (is) distributed by Netflix, the massive streaming company's first Best Picture-nominated film.  Not only is this yet another signifier of the company's growing power and influence, but - more positively - it makes the work immediately available to millions of people around the world (as opposed to most Oscar prestige films which open in a handful of cities and only to the rest of the world much later, if at all).  Combine this availability with the fact that Roma is a foreign language film, and this represents an excellent opportunity to spread diverse, high-quality art widely.  I must also admit that for those of us with short attention spans, getting to see Roma at home is also an advantage so you can watch this deliberately-paced film in chunks (I highly recommend splitting it in two, with an "intermission").  I encourage you to stream this sometime soon, and if you don't have Netflix, get it for a month (and while you've got it, try Avengers: Infinity War for counterprogramming).



* By Source, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=59422310

Saturday, February 16, 2019

The LEGO Movie 2: The Second Part


Score:  B

Directed by Mike Mitchell
Starring Chris Pratt, Elizabeth Banks, Will Arnett, Tiffany Haddish
Running time: 107 minutes
Rated PG

Long Story Short:  The LEGO Movie 2 tracks the continuing adventures of Emmet, Lucy and their fellow yellow, plastic friends.  If you've seen the original, then you'll know what to expect from this one, but, of course, that delightful sense of surprise is now gone.  Unfortunately, the overall quality is also lower, even if it still provides some laughs and heart.  Much more appropriate for a family audience this time, if that's not you, you won't be missing out if you wait for it on Netflix.


Not everything is awesome anymore in Bricksburg, home of Emmet (Pratt), Lucy (Banks), and friends.  An alien species of bricks (Duplos) begins to stage devastating attacks on the city, turning the once-thriving metropolis into a desert-like Apocalypseburg.  While Emmet remains positive and tries to build a quiet new life for himself and Lucy, his friends have all become decidedly gloomy and pessimistic.  The Duplos, led by the fearsome warrior General Sweet Mayhem, return for a decisive strike and kidnap Lucy, Batman, and others, taking them to her mysterious leader, Queen Watevra Wa'Nabi  (Haddish).  The lone survivor, Emmet is desperate to rescue his friends and builds a spaceship to pursue them.  He receives help along the way from a rogue, Rex Dangervest, but Emmet soon discovers that not all is as it seems in his expanding world of bricks.

The LEGO Movie 2 has a large, fun cast of voice actors, returning many of the leads and swapping in some interesting new voices.  Chris Pratt is again the lead, as Everybrickman Emmet, and he is still great as the eternal optimist.  His eager naivete is still a central part of the good-hearted humor of the series, although the character is tempted a bit more by the "dark side" in this one.  Elizabeth Banks's Lucy gets a bigger role this time around, and her tough yet compassionate punk ably carries her half of the film's arc.  Rather than facing emotions wholly new to her, she instead must confront aspects of her past she would rather keep hidden.  Will Arnett as Batman, the scene-stealing third wheel, is also back, although having fully plumbed his "darkness" and narcissism in the first film plus his own solo adventure, there's not much new or interesting to his act.  Tiffany Haddish is the most significant new player in the film, playing a strong, cool but rather cruel leader of the "bad guy" Duplos.  While Haddish gets a starring role in one of the film's musical scenes, the film doesn't really take full advantage of her wicked, hilarious wit.  Other notable returning members include Charlie Day, Alison Brie and Nick Offerman in roles as Emmet and Lucy's sidekicks, but they are essentially reduced to cameos here.  Maya Rudolph also fills in nicely for Will Ferrell this time as the live-action human, a fair switch from the Dad in the original to the Mom in the sequel.

LEGO Movie 2 is a solid family film, built on the unique style and narrative framework of the original, but it also lacks the spark and finely-honed script of that film.  Warner found a winning formula with the 2014 LEGO Movie, combining a bluntly silly yet smart humor with a good heart at its core and sturdy lesson, and the sequel's filmmakers hew as closely to it as they can - for both good and ill.  While the original hid its real-world parallels until late in the film, this one shows flashes from the start, and is much more extensive in its final act.  The idea, of sibling relationships, is simple but strong, yet the more overt way it unfolds is clearly intended more for the young ones this time.  While the setup of the LEGO world element is interesting, the story flow from there is all too predictable.  The lone exception is a significant twist around the middle, but as soon as it happens, it's quickly apparent what the new trajectory will be.  In short, it lacks the moment to moment excitement of the original.  Unfortunately, this combines with a script that tries too hard to match the frequency and cleverness of the original's humor.  There are plenty of chuckles to be had, certainly, but there's also a lot of repetition in a machine-gun blast of attempts.  Partly the film suffers from not having the magic combination of characters (e.g., Emmet and Morgan Freeman's wizard), but it's also surprising that returning writers/creators Phil Lord and Christopher Miller just don't bring their fastball this time.  By all means, there is plenty of fun to be had in this sequel, including some new, infectious pop songs and accompanying party scenes.  But what we have here is more an ordinary, don't-fix-it-if-it-ain't broke approach than a fresh or exceedingly well crafted classic.

---

The LEGO Movie 2 is a fine film, and my opinions on it are heavily affected by at least two factors.  First, the inevitable comparisons to the original, which was such a surprisingly creative and high quality revelation back in 2014.  It would have been extremely difficult for any sequel to live up to that, even if only because now we are expecting it to be so good.  Second is that the sequel is clearly much more tilted to the younger end of its audience.  Whether it is the repetition of the simple types of humor that sent the kids in my theater into hysterics over and over again, or the much more straightforward story and message, this is definitely more of a family film than the original.  Which is perfectly fine - but also good to be aware of.  But, as there are surely many, many more sequels or remakes of various franchises on the way this year, I'm hoping the next ones are, if not "everything awesome", then at least a bit more creative.  Go see this one for sure if you have little ones; otherwise, no need to rush out to the theater.




By Source (WP:NFCC#4), Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=59960736

Saturday, February 9, 2019

The Favourite


Score:  B+

Directed by Yorgos Lanthimos
Starring Olivia Colman, Emma Stone, Rachel Weisz, Nicholas Hoult
Running time: 120 minutes
Rated R

Long Story Short:  The Favourite is a period piece in the unique stylings of its director, Yorgos Lanthimos.  Its title is apt not just for the central drama of two women fighting for Queen Anne's favor, but also for the raft of awards it's up for.  Colman, Weisz and Stone make a tremendous trio and lift up the movie, but it's also weighed down by the coldness of Lanthimos's style.  A great choice for the right audience, otherwise, Netflix it if you're curious.


In the 18th century, Queen Anne (Colman) oversees England's war with France through her trusted adviser Sarah (Weisz), who attempts to also assist her with her debilitating gout.  As Sarah battles against members of Parliament who stridently resist the ongoing war - or at least the heavy taxation that it requires - she finds herself aided by the unexpected arrival of Abigail (Stone).  Abigail, once of nobility, has come to court seeking employment, and shows skill in caring for the Queen's ailments.  However, Abigail soon finds herself in a precarious position after discovering an explosive secret and - separately - being approached by a rival to serve as a spy.  Sarah and Abigail's friendship quickly becomes strained, and the result of their escalating personal battle will have much farther reaching consequences.

The Favourite's cast is led by its impressive trio of actresses.  Olivia Colman's Queen Anne as the lead is in some ways upstaged by her co-stars, but as the central figure in the story, serves as its crucial anchor.  Like several other recent historical roles, her physical bearing is transformative, her legs hobbled among other disabilities, which is a significant element of the character.  But she presents the complex interior of the Queen even more vividly.  Sarah and others treat her almost like a child at times, and her sudden shrieks of frustration and other moments of gentle, seemingly naive play and wondering surely bring this on her.  Yet she is also clearly more aware of what is going on around her - and how others truly see her - than such a passive character would.  Colman shows the overwhelming breadth and depth of the effects of her royal life/prison, but is also more than the sum of those injuries, vanities and powers.  Rachel Weisz and Emma Stone are both excellent as well as Anne's competing ladies.  On the surface, they are each other's opposite: Sarah is formal and well-trained, at home in the court and dutifully serving her country; Abigail is shyer and more playful, willing to serve others in myriad ways to keep herself free.  But each is extremely intelligent, and resort to greater ruthlessness to achieve their aims.  They even adopt each other's styles in doing so, with Sarah mounting a guerrilla campaign and Abigail joining the socialites.  Nicholas Hoult gets the only significant supporting role, and he's great fun as the Queen's rival; usually on the humorous receiving end of the ladies' superior tactics, he nonetheless plays a crucial connecting role of his own.

The Favourite is a period piece like no other; its strange, funny and mischievous tone is a difficulty adjustment, but it's elevated by the remarkable performances.  Director Yorgos Lanthimos is one-of-a-kind himself, and it took me a good half hour to adjust to both its historical dialogue style splashed with dry wit, as well as (or, combined with) its confusing mixture of direct narrative events with tongue-in-cheek silliness.  Fortunately, it all gets considerably easier to follow once the most heavily stylized first act is done and it gets down to business.  The main action of the film is the battle between Sarah and Abigail, although I'm sure I missed a lot on what I consider the periphery - both due to the odd dialogue and my own lack of sophistication.  This rivalry is intriguing and fun in many ways, but the style creates a detachedness that even the terrific performances can't overcome.  Watching Weisz's Sarah operate in court is fascinating, both outmaneuvering her rivals and guiding Anne to the right decisions (usually gently, sometimes fiercely).  When she suffers a betrayal, an eye patch is a great symbol of her character's ultimate transformation.  Stone's Abigail is great, too, seeing her early, humiliating struggles followed by her gleeful (often manipulative) fun with her transfixed male companion.  Her transformation - a loss of control over her ego - is interesting as well.  But, apart from a few brief pigeon shootings together, it happens in isolation.  As rich as the performances are and the skill and intention behind its filming, I felt a kind of emptiness by the end.  Technically very good - and perhaps even better with a rewatch - but it's as frustrated as Anne herself by the inability to flourish despite its strengths.

---

The Favourite is a strong film, one that I can see why both critics and certain types of audiences would just adore.  The director, Lanthimos, also did one of the worst movies I've ever seen, The Lobster, which has the same odd style - in the mold of Wes Anderson, although emphasizing a dry wit and (often exasperating) incongruity.  The Favourite is much more viewer friendly than that one, fortunately, although my personal reaction is that he just tries too hard to be clever (although maybe I'm just too simple).  The performances transcend their director's quirkiness (wherever you stand onit), and gradually as the film goes on Lanthimos focuses more on them than his own devices.  This film certainly isn't for everyone, but if you're looking for something different, this might be it.  Just be warned that it is explicit to a level that you don't expect from a period piece.




* Source: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5083738/mediaviewer/rm2667934464

Saturday, February 2, 2019

Green Book


Score:  B-

Directed by Peter Farrelly
Starring Viggo Mortensen, Mahershala Ali, Linda Cardellini
Running time: 130 minutes
Rated PG-13

Long Story Short:  Green Book is based on the true story of a world-class black pianist on tour in the 1960s, stewarded by a provincial white New York bouncer.  Mahershala Ali and Viggo Mortensen serve as the talented, appealing leads with a good rapport, but they find themselves in a poorly devised mess.  Lacking the sophistication or sometimes even the responsibility of its cinematic kin, the film putters along well beyond its welcome.  Netflix if you're curious.


It's 1962 and "Tony Lip" Vallelonga (Mortensen), a bouncer, is out of work and increasingly desperate to provide for his family when he receives a tip that a doctor is looking for an assistant.  He finds that this doctor, who lives above Carnegie Music Hall, is a world-class concert pianist and about to embark on a two-month tour of the midwest and Deep South.  Reluctantly, Tony agrees to serve as Don Shirley's (Ali) driver and protector as he makes his way through performances large and small, public and private in places unfamiliar to both of them.  While the men come from completely different worlds, they find that they depend on each other to make it through an exhausting yet exhilarating journey.

Green Book has a tiny cast; essentially, it's just the odd couple leads and both of them give it their all. Viggo Mortensen's "Tony Lip" is arguably the slightly more central character in the story, and the role is about as far from his Aragorn of Lord of the Rings as you can imagine.  Mortensen gives a committed, impressive performance.  He developed a slightly paunchy yet beefy physique, and moves in a way that makes his enforcer background believable.  In everything from his thick Bronx accent to his lack of manners to his thickheadedness, Mortensen plays Tony on the edge of parody, at times slipping over due to the script.  But for the most part, Viggo saves the character from himself, coming off as sympathetic more often than pandering.  Mahershala Ali does very well, too, in a much more subtle performance.  He, too, is in a role far different than what I'm used to, which is typically confident and cool to varying degrees.  Don is obviously great at what he does, but Ali shows his insecurity and vulnerability clearly, too.  Don also strays close to cliche, unfortunately, although more so in the situations he finds himself rather than his behavior.  The most significant other roles are Tony's family, particularly his wife (played by Cardellini); Don's bandmates; and the various hosts for his performances, but none of these serve as anything more than narrative devices.

Green Book is a warm film with a few powerful moments and good humor, but it's ultimately undone by incredibly cliched plotting, a poor script, and a questionable tone.  By far the best thing about the film is the talent of its two leads, and the push-pull relationship they develop.  It's really the little moments between them that are the strongest parts, from Tony sharing his love of fried chicken with Don to Don's quiet but exasperated criticisms of the ineloquent but oblivious Tony - most of this taking place in the car they share for thousands of miles.  There are also some striking moments in this film that tries to tell both the macro-story of societal racism in the 1960s as well as the difficulty of individual relationships.  Don - and the audience - receives catharsis when he lets loose with a classical tour de force for a stunned black audience; and he gives Tony a piece of his mind in the pouring rain in the film's only genuine and insightful speech.  However, as good as Ali and Viggo are, the film is weighed down by a clunky, poorly-written script that produces a sanitized, numbing, sometimes even inappropriate tone (or perhaps the causation is the other way around).  The script is completely free of subtlety, which results in scenes drained of all impact, like Tony's saving Don from a bar pummeling, or even shocking thoughtlessness, like a sudden and glib revealing of Don's sexuality.  The film hits all the beats, more and more dutifully - and dully - as it goes on, that you expect from the subject.  Maybe it would be more acceptable in a vacuum, if racism was a brand new topic at the cinemas.  But we are living in a golden age of films on the African American experience, and we've seen this all before (or have the opportunity to, anyway) done much better.  Tackling these serious, heavy themes on the back of a light-hearted odd couple drama may be possible to do effectively - but it doesn't work here.

---

Green Book is a disappointing entry in the Best Picture category of the 2019 Oscars.  When I found out about it last fall, the premise and combination of leads seemed quite promising.  It won the People's Choice Award at the Toronto Film Festival, which in some ways isn't surprising: it at least tries to be a crowd pleaser, more upbeat than, say, 12 Years a Slave.  And I have no problem with that type of film in general, even when combined with this serious subject matter - I loved Hidden Figures, for example.  But Green Book illustrates the dangers of this approach well, even when the performers are talented and respectful.  So fair warning if you were intending to see this:  you can just wait for it on Netflix if you really want to.




By Source, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=59741016