Monday, March 2, 2026

2025 "On Your Left" Film Year-in-Review


 
2025 "On Your Left" Film Year-in-Review

It's that time again - celebrating a year's worth of movies!  After a slight down year at the movies in 2024, Hollywood, and my theater habits, returned to normal.  I saw twenty-five different movies in theaters, which has been about my average over the last decade or so.  Just as important, there was better variety in the new releases and, overall, stronger quality, too.  Last year I saw few Oscar-nominated movies, both by choice and availability, but that rebounded in 2025, and I saw a healthy cross-section of genres including, encouragingly, more comedies than I've seen in years.  There weren't a whole lot of surprises, in that the movies I expected to be good (and/or critics said were good) turned out that way, mostly.  But I did steer clear of movies that had low Rotten Tomatoes critic scores in 2025 more than usual, opting instead for well-reviewed movies even if they weren't the kind I usually see.  I guess I was just risk-averse: I didn't want to sit through three bad movies for every one that was a pleasant surprise. 

Hollywood is absolutely in the midst of transformation as it struggles to survive (particularly the theatrical business) in this streaming era.  Studios have found that horror and animated/family movies offer the best bang for their buck, which is rather unfortunate (IMO).  But 2025 showed that plenty of other strategies can also succeed, like with Sinners (I'm praying that Hollywood takes careful note of this).  Without further ado, these were the highlights (and a few lowlights).

Here is the format of this post, same as in years past:
  • Top 10 films of the year!
  • Most underrated/overrated films
  • Most surprising/disappointing films
  • Worst film of the year
  • List of other films I saw in theaters (with links to my reviews)
  • Films I saw on streaming
Please check out my companion post here, which is more like my Oscar-style awards.  I hope you'll check out some of these movies for yourself!


Top 10 Films of 2025

10. *TIE* The Naked Gun (directed by Akiva Schaffer; starring Liam Neeson and Pamela Anderson) and One of Them Days (directed by Lawrence Lamont; starring Keke Palmer and SZA)

Starting off with my usual "cheat" of a tie, The Naked Gun and One of Them Days presented the best pure comedy that 2025 had to offer.  The Naked Gun is a remake of a classic parody from the 80s, and Neeson stepped quite ably into Nielsen's giant clown shoes.  I appreciated that they kept the earnestly silly tone and style as similar to the original as possible.  Obviously, there are plenty of modern references (EVs, crypto) and updated social milieu, but there's plenty of timeless slapstick, too.  One of Them Days is an update, too, in a way: instead of featuring two white bros overcoming obstacles including their own foibles, it's two young Black women (Palmer is one of the best young comic actors).  This movie is also quite silly, in a much different way, and also joyful and playful in spirit.  It also manages to convey the culture and struggles of a distinct class, too, and those not familiar with it will learn a thing or two along while being riotously entertained.


9. Mission Impossible: Final Reckoning (directed by Christopher McQuarrie; starring Tom Cruise, Hayley Atwell, Simon Pegg, et al)

The fifth and (probably?) last Mission movie I've reviewed on this blog went out with a bang in the most important ways, although also a bit of a whimper.  A key ingredient of the franchise has been its clever labyrinths of loyalties and schemes; you never know exactly what will happen except that Cruise's Ethan will save the day.  Unfortunately, Final Reckoning mostly jettisons the mystery, replacing it with quite a bit of Ethan-as-savior worship and the President deciding if and when to nuke the rest of the world.  Oh, well: the much more important parts are its insane stunt sequences.  One deep undersea where everything seems to go wrong; and another high in the sky with Ethan literally hanging off a biplane.  They are breathtaking (esp. in the theater) and perfect capstones to Cruise's impressive Mission career.


8. Fantastic Four: First Steps (directed by Matt Shakman; starring Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby, Julia Garner, et al)

This newest iteration of the Fantastic Four superhero team exceeded my (admittedly low) expectations, another triumph for Team Marvel.  The 2005 and 2007 movies, starring Gruffudd and Alba, were OK at best; it seemed like about as generic of superhero fare as possible (I didn't even see the dreadfully-reviewed 2015 version).  So I was lukewarm at best when I heard the MCU was rebooting these heroes, but like with Spider-Man, they succeeded in creating a fresh, high-quality take.  Pascal and Kirby are typically superb casting as the leads, and the movie wisely focuses on these characters, rather than the obligatory plot (yes, yet another world-ending one, but I very much enjoyed the various methods to solve it-not just fighting!).  Add in a rich, retro-futurist 60s vibe, and this was an overlooked blockbuster.


7. Warfare (directed by Ray Mendoza and Alex Garland; starring Will Poulter, Joseph Quinn, et al)

One of those out-of-the-blue movies for me, Warfare is one of the best war movies I've ever seen.  Co-directed by one of the veterans of an Iraq battle (2006) that this movie depicts, it is incredibly tense and seemingly extremely realistic.  A platoon is attacked in an urban ambush, and survival is the key mission and focus.  This is far from some Hollywood jingoistic affair: there are no waves of enemies getting mowed down heroically.  Yes, the soldiers are very heroic and courageous (and also, understandably, terrified and prone to occasional mistakes) but we rarely even glimpse an enemy, let alone see one be shot.  The sound of incoming enemy fire is constant and menacing, however.  There's a bit of gore, but the real terror and lessons are understanding the chaos and danger.  Superbly paced and shot.


6. Materialists (directed by Celine Song; starring Dakota Johnson, Chris Evans, and Pedro Pascal)

Rom-coms are not usually my favorites, but this one has too many intriguing and enjoyable elements to resist.  Its central idea is the conundrum of modern dating: there are so many ways to connect with each other, yet single people are often overwhelmed by this choice and set expectations too high.  Johnson, playing a matchmaker, deftly handles hilarious scenes dealing with her clients' ridiculous demands or relationship situations.  Evans and Pascal are, of course, a charming pair of suitors for her affection.  While the matchmaking can get hyperbolized for comic effect, the love triangle, and thus the central personal drama, is very finely and genuinely drawn.  All three are quite flawed people, even the seemingly perfect Pascal, but the movie focuses more on the importance of relationship dynamics and how two people just click - or not.


5. Sinners (directed by Ryan Coogler; starring Michael B. Jordan, Miles Caton, Jack O'Connell, et al)

I certainly enjoyed the wildly creative breakout hit from last year like everyone else, although I'm a bit in the middle in terms of excitement.  Director Coogler, who is right up there with the best of his peers like Nolan and Villeneuve, does a great job of patiently building the 1930s South world, full of intriguing characters, its harshness yet with opportunities for the skilled and cunning.  Jordan's twins are the ostensible leads, and they do anchor the action, but it's really the support around him, especially virtuoso cousin Sammie (Caton).  I also liked how the supernatural is gradually eased in, then bursts into full, brilliant flower with the famed music scene.  I felt let down by the ending, which was too generic monster horror stuff for my taste, but the first two-thirds alone are outstanding cinema.


4. Wake Up Dead Man - Knives Out 3 (directed by Rian Johnson; starring Daniel Craig, Josh O'Connor, Josh Brolin, et al)

The third (and final? I hope not!) Knives Out movie is perhaps the best one yet, and I was lucky enough to get to see it in the theater (rather than - boo! - at home on Netflix).  If you've seen the first two, you'll be familiar with the overall structure to this murder mystery: a setting and its colorful characters are introduced, a horrible crime is committed, and Craig's eccentric but brilliant detective Blanc seemingly bumbles his way to a solution.  The scenario this time is especially powerful, as it pits the power of faith against Blanc's unswerving (even cynical) reason and logic.  As the best movies do, it has a lot to say about our world and society without preaching (pardon the pun) about it.  The supporting cast is great yet again, and O'Connor's young priest is a brilliant standout.  Despite its structural similarities, writer/ director Johnson keeps his franchise as fresh - and entertaining - as ever.


3. Hamnet (directed by Chloe Zhao; starring Jessie Buckley and Paul Mescal)

I can be a bit skeptical about movies that seem to be as directly aimed as awards bait as this one, but Hamnet is an engrossing, high-quality movie without feeling that weight (some might say pretension).  It's a period piece that literally has Shakespeare as a main character, yet it doesn't feel like what that might imply.  It helps that his wife, Agnes, is the main character and as played by Jessie Buckley, she is one of the most astonishing yet grounded figures I've seen in a movie in years.  I loved the respect the movie shows for her pagan roots, a falconer whose true home is the forest.  Shakespeare himself is mesmerized by this, too, though their courtship is refreshingly quite ordinary.  Family life is portrayed so genuinely and touchingly, I didn't mind the resulting lack of plot as well as was affected all the more deeply by the tragedy that strikes.  The play Hamlet itself concludes the film, an obvious choice yet also (and more importantly) the perfect one.  Just a phenomenal movie, bypassing any and all of my doubts.


2. Thunderbolts* (directed by Jake Schreier; starring Florence Pugh, Sebastian Stan, Julia Louis-Dreyfus, et al)

Is this the second best movie of the year? No, but it's my second favorite - and a damn good one, too.  The Thunderbolts are kind of the cast-off version of the Avengers, or almost like DC's Suicide Squad, a team of villains; these guys are more anti-heroes.  For Marvel nerds (like me), almost all the characters are familiar, though it all still makes enough sense for casual audiences.  But for me, the interweaving of these characters, each with their own previous history of failures - and worse - was particularly potent and interesting.  Pugh's Yelena (Black Widow's sister) is the leader of this group and movie and she does an excellent job as the emotional and moral core, one that is much more fraught and damaged than the Avengers'.  Beyond her are many more characters, and at least a few plot threads from previous movies (or even TV shows), yet Thunderbolts* handles them as deftly as I've come to expect from Marvel.  It also has great humor, particularly from Yelena's jolly father played by Harbour (think Captain Russia).  Anyone can enjoy this movie, but for those who've been following Marvel, it harnesses a depth of plot, theme, and character work that is simply not possible in other movies.


1. One Battle After Another (directed by Paul Thomas Anderson; starring Leonardo DiCaprio, Chase Infiniti, Sean Penn, Teyana Taylor, et al)

The best movie of the year had a little of just about everything in it: cultural/political relevance, great acting all around, pulse-pounding action, good humor, a satisfying ending, and more.  As I've taken to calling it, "lightning in a bottle".  Of the few I've seen, I've enjoyed the films of director Paul Thomas Anderson to varying degrees (There Will Be Blood: great; Licorice Pizza: mediocre), but he's clearly one of the most talented filmmakers today, so when I saw him teamed up with one of the best actors today, DiCaprio, this was a no-brainer.  Still, even the most ideal setups can end in disappointment, and the trailer for this was... odd.  This is an adaptation of a book I haven't read, so it's hard to know exactly how much credit of the story and so on is owed to PTA.  Surely he, and the entire cast and crew, deserve tremendous accolades for a movie that contains so much yet feels perfectly fit together.

PTA wrote the screenplay well before Trump's return to the White House, so his vision of a dystopian American immigration system is chilling but sucks in the audience with tremendous force right from the beginning.  The movie does a great job of showing and not telling you what to think about this world in which an oppressive authority exerts itself on otherwise ordinary life, a terror to its targets and those actively attempting to resist it.  But that's really just the setting; there are powerful images and moments (of caged children, families hidden in secret upper floors), but the characters drive the action and story.  DiCaprio's aptly named Bob starts off as a familiar Hollywood figure, the naive but passionate young revolutionary.  But for most of the film, he is brilliantly inverted into a fizzled out, broken down man who cares much more about those closest to him now, rather than the big, abstract mission, but seems almost powerless to affect any outcome.  The past (via Col. Lockjaw, his revolutionary nemesis, still hunting him down), present (via Sergio, the leader of the revolution's successor, a quiet survivor), and future (via Willa, his daughter, a fighter unsure of her true fight) are all mixed together.  This plays out in riveting form - a sneaky nighttime escape as soldiers assault a "sanctuary" town; a literally up-and-down multi-part car chase, etc.  And also through humor - Bob's attempts to remember the revolution's passwords, a ludicrous (though repugnant) white supremacist group, etc.  Despite its strange mix of tones, characters, and themes, it's all perfectly blended into both entertainment of the highest possible caliber, as well as so much to consider in both our personal lives and the world beyond.




Most Underrated Film of the Year:  Captain America: Brave New World
It just missed my top-10 of the year, but the new Captain America movie - and the first with Sam (Mackie) as the title hero.  Its 46% rating on Rotten Tomatoes is ridiculously low, however, as is its box office haul ($200 million in the U.S.; might seem like a lot, but the previous CA movie made $408 million!).  I chalk up the reviews, largely, to "superhero fatigue", something that's increased for the past few years.  I think that's completely irrelevant information, at least to explicitly include in a review (of course, I'm a bit biased myself) - just judge the movie on its own merits!!  Is the movie even better, as most Marvel movies are, if you've seen previous Marvel chapters?  Absolutely!  Let's just say I have "superhero fatigue fatigue". :-)
  
Most Overrated Film of the Year:  Marty Supreme
This is not a bad movie, but it's definitely my least favorite of the Oscar Best Picture nominees that I have seen.  In some ways, it's a pretty well-made movie, with a great performance from Chalamet and a pacing that bounces nicely from mishap to mishap.  My problem with it is that Marty just becomes more and more repugnant as the movie goes on, leaves more and more damage in his wake.  There's certainly room for nasty characters in movies, even as the main character, but what made it all too much was Marty's victories - moral ones at that - in the ending.  I've seen worse Best Picture nominees, but if this somehow wins the award, I'll be disgusted.

Most Surprisingly-Good Film of the Year:  Ballerina + Novocaine
These two movies are tied for me because they're both action movies that easily could have coasted on their main premises into bland, bad movies - but they ended up being quite successful.  Novocaine is the more original of the two, not part of any franchise or based on any book or other work.  Quaid is a winning main character, an unlikely hero whose only advantage is that he can't feel pain.  So it's an action comedy, one with a nice balance of silliness but not parody or roll-your-eyes.  Ballerina is a spinoff from the hugely successful John Wick action franchise starring Keanu Reeves, and thus a bigger risk in some ways.  Ana de Armas does an excellent job as the new action star, though, and the movie makes full use of the interesting world of Wick.  Actually, the worst part of the movie is too much Reeves toward the end of the movie.  Hopefully de Armas will get another chance to shine!

Most Disappointing Film of the Year:  The Roses
Like Marty Supreme, this was not a bad movie - in fact, this is quite a bit more enjoyable than Marty even though the subject is a couple falling apart with increasing venom and methods.  The things is, this could/should have been one of the best movies of the year, considering its all-star cast.  Colman and Cumberbatch are excellent overall actors who are also known for their sharp comedic edges; and McKinnon and Samberg, as supporting characters, are two of SNL's best exports in the last few decades.  But the writing and directing just aren't on the same level as the acting.  There's plenty to enjoy here, still, almost entirely thanks to the performances; I just wish it was even better.

Worst Film of the Year:  The Running Man + Fountain of Youth
These two action movies are essentially the inverse of the surprisingly-good Novocaine and Ballerina: lazily done and with a variety of poor creative choices that sunk them almost from the very start.  I couldn't even remember what Fountain of Youth (Apple TV) was about when I started writing this.  It's kind of a poor-man's National Treasure/Indiana Jones with the mediocre Kransinski starring and Portman and Gonzalez wasted for nothing.  The Running Man, which I saw in the theater, features a similarly mediocre star, or at least poorly-cast one, in Powell, and it just strains way too hard to be Relevant; the last third of the movie is particularly sad.  These aren't quite as bad as stinkers from previous years, but I still strongly recommend that you avoid them.


(other) Movies I Streamed in 2025:
  • A House of Dynamite (B+):  This thriller would have been really fun to watch in a movie theater (thanks, Netflix!! *heavy sarcasm*). The acting is strong, it feels realistic to how the decision-makers would likely talk and behave, and it has an interesting chronology.  The writing is not quite as sharp as it needs to be and again, it would have been more exciting to see in a theater.
  • Mountainhead (B+):  A deadpan black comedy about our tech-bro overlords, this is often quite funny - especially a scene where three of them debate the merits and obstacles of murdering one of their friends in cold blood.  The casting is quite good (Carell, Youssef, etc.) and thinly veiled impressions (Zuckerberg, Bezos, etc.).  Somewhat of a throw-away, but very entertaining.
  • Black Bag (B+):  I don't remember this one too well, either, just another of the downfalls of streaming, but on jogging my memory with Wikipedia, this was a high-quality espionage thriller with a great cast.  What holds it back from a better score is related to the fact that there's not a lot to distinguish it from other genre movies in my memory.
  • Mickey 17 (B+):  Oscar winning director Bong Joon Ho (Parasite) returned with this sci-fi oddity.  Pattinson does a really nice job in the lead, and his various clones, which is crucial for a movie like this.  Ruffalo's Trump-like leader of the abandoned space mission is pretty funny, too, but like BB above, there's just a limit to how much I can like genre movies like this anymore (especially when I see them on streaming instead of a theater).
  • The Lost Bus (B/B+):  Most of this movie is quite good in realistically portraying the harrowing 2018 wildfire that devastated parts of California.  McConaughey and Ferrera are in the literal line of fire and create very empathetic characters for the terrors of the disaster.  We get just enough of the bird's-eye view of the fire and efforts to fight it to give us context, but it's mostly about the struggle to survive.  The ending is a bit underwhelming, but it's still quite well done overall.
  • The Gorge (B):  Another sci-fi action movie - I just can't quit them, it seems!  Teller and Taylor-Joy's characters form a nice chemistry, and the premise of a mysterious DMZ is intriguing enough.  Once the veil is pulled back, though, it reverts to fairly typical genre conventions, though.  Put it at the upper end of the genre's mediocre tier.
  • Heads of State (B):  Not a great film, this is much better than it should be.  Cena and Elba team up as the American and British leaders - and, apparently, action heroes - in a ridiculous premise that is played at face value, mostly, yet is still quite watchable and fun.  It helps that Cena and Elba have a great rapport, there's just enough winking at the premise, and doesn't take itself too seriously.
  • You're Cordially Invited (B-):  Witherspoon and Ferrell, a bit of an acting odd couple, are pleasant leads for this comedy launched by the interesting premise of two weddings booked for the same venue on the same date.  Not all the attempts at humor land, and it can get a little too confused in its tone - but it's also something a little different, and who can say no to Ferrell? (not me)

Other Movies I Saw in Theaters in 2025:


Wednesday, February 18, 2026

2025 "On Your Left" Film Awards


 2025 "On Your Left" Film Awards

It's the time of year again to celebrate the best of the previous year's movies.  I saw quite a few movies, either in theaters or at home via streaming - and as always, there was a mixture of the good, the bad, and the OK.  I've written more about the movies themselves in my Year-in-Review post, but here I'll focus on the best performances of the year.

For this Oscar-style awards post, I'm sticking with my rule that only films I've seen are eligible.  Other than that, if it's eligible at the Oscars this year, it's eligible for me.

Please also check out my year-in-review post with my top-10 movies of the year, most overrated and most surprising movies, and more, too!

Winners in bold
Runners-up underlined


Best Actor
Timothee Chalamet (Marty Supreme)
Leonardo DiCaprio (One Battle After Another)
Michael B. Jordan (Sinners)
Paul Mescal (Hamnet)
Josh O'Connor (Wake Up Dead Man-Knives Out 3)

Honorable mentions: Tim Robinson (Friendship), Tom Cruise (Mission Impossible: Final Reckoning)
Oscar nominees I didn't see: Ethan Hawke (Blue Moon), Wagner Moura (The Secret Agent)

While not making the list of "official" nominees, I wanted to give shout-outs to Tim Robinson for his debut starring film role - his comedic style is unique, to say the least, and a needed dose of creativity for a badly reeling genre; and to Tom Cruise, in his (presumably) final Mission Impossible - the movie itself let him down, but he continued to take his stunt work to extraordinary new heights (literally and figuratively).  Mescal was great as an understated William Shakespeare in Hamnet, taking the 1B role and making the playwright into a real human, not some mythic legend.  O'Connor continues to impress in his relatively young career, this time grabbing the reigns of the exciting Knives Out mystery franchise and with his good yet conflicted priest, going toe-to-toe with Daniel Craig's famed detective.  Jordan provided the central intensity for the wildly original, breakout hit Sinners; while I couldn't distinguish his twin characters' personalities, he was the perfect actor for the role.  Chalamet breathed life into the conniving ping-pong champ in Marty Supreme; any less fascinating performance would have resulted in a movie too agonizing to watch.  

No stranger to the top of the acting world, DiCaprio was the best in 2025 in One Battle After Another.  Yes, he is the central figure, but he doesn't make it about himself; he perfectly syncs with the other elements of the movie, exemplifying "greater than the sum of its parts".  As the once-formidable revolutionary, oddly named Bob, DiCaprio is a believable father and flawed average man (not just for his drug habit) with a mostly-dormant zeal for his old trade that can't help but resurface occasionally.  He is sympathetic; sometimes, just pathetic; hilarious; world-weary; and bright-eyed - DiCaprio puts all these things together like no one else could.


Best Actress
Jessie Buckley (Hamnet)
Chase Infiniti (One Battle After Another)
Keke Palmer (One of Them Days)
Florence Pugh (Thunderbolts*)
Emma Stone (Bugonia)

Honorable mentions: Ana de Armas (Ballerina-A John Wick Story), Dakota Johnson (Materialists)
Oscar nominees I didn't see: Rose Byrne (If I Had Legs I'd Kick You), Kate Hudson (Song Sung Blue), Renate Reinsve (Sentimental Value)

Ana de Armas receives what I'll call the "Tom Cruise" award for her committed physical performance in the hard-hitting grittiness of her John Wick-spinoff hit woman.  Johnson is subtly great in a much different kind of role; she has to balance being a superhuman matchmaker with a very average personal life, and pulls it off well.  Newcomer Chase Infiniti is a revelation in One Battle..., showing both the terror of being hunted by the government but also fierce resolve as a burgeoning fighter for justice.  Palmer is one of the funniest comedic actors on the planet today, and clearly has a blast with the bonkers One of Them Days, while still keeping her role pretty damn relatable.  Stone is an annual presence on my list of best actors and her Bugonia is a worthy addition, working with now-common partner director Lanthimos; she pulls off intensity, insanity, and ordinariness all without breaking a sweat.  Pugh is another common nominee for me, and her pugnacious little superhero sister Yelena gets a perfect showcase in the outrageously overlooked Thunderbolts*; she is a worthy new symbol and leader of Marvel's great character work (you heard me!).

Best of the best this year is Jessie Buckley's Agnes, a tour de force performance that turns what could have been a pretty average, if tear-jerking, drama into a fully felt, fully human story.  She uses precious few words, particularly early on as an independent spirit of the woods, instead using her eyes and mouth to convey everything you need to know.  Affection for one William Shakespeare inspires her to leave her solo life behind, and her dedication forms her into the leader her family needs.  The camera focuses on her for much of the film, even - especially - in the most agonizing moments, and in them Buckley shows the audience true love with all its attendant emotions.

Best Supporting Actress
Odessa A'zion (Marty Supreme)
Glenn Close (Wake Up Dead Man-Knives Out 3)
Julia Louis-Dreyfus (Thunderbolts*)
SZA (One of Them Days)
Teyana Taylor (One Battle After Another)

Disagree w/ Oscars: Wunmi Mosaku (Sinners)
Oscar nominees I didn't see: Elle Fanning (Sentimental Value), Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas (Sentimental Value), Amy Madigan (Weapons)

SZA turned out to be a great partner-in-crime for Palmer in One of Them Days, so ridiculous (yet good-natured) that her co-star could be the "straight" arrow while being only slightly less silly.  A'zion plays the only other true character in Marty Supreme, even though she, like everyone else, gets trampled by his shenanigans; still, you can feel her pain more acutely than others'.  Louis-Dreyfus gets a bit of a role-achievement nod here, as one would not expect her to be in one Marvel movie, let alone several plus a TV series; she gets her most Marvel screentime in Thunderbolts and takes full advantage as her anti-heroine (sort of an anti-Nick Fury) role and keeps it hilarious.  Close is the quietest by far of my nominees, quite content to be shunted to the side by the larger-than-life Detective Blanc and Father Wicks, but Close's quasi-nun is underestimated to your peril.  Teyana Taylor might not have a lot of screentime, either, but she is probably the most vivid image of the best movie of 2025.  Yes, she is fighting for a righteous cause, but she is not afraid to get dirty doing it, nor will she apologize for it (quite the opposite, in fact).  Her fallibility is heartbreaking, though, and lingers with the audience, inextricably intertwined with the movie's message, long afterward.


Best Supporting Actor
Josh Brolin (Wake Up Dead Man-Knives Out 3)
Benicio del Toro (One Battle After Another)
Delroy Lindo (Sinners)
Sean Penn (One Battle After Another)
Paul Rudd (Friendship)

Oscar nominees I didn't see: Jacob Elordi (Frankenstein), Stellan Skarsgaard (Sentimental Value)

Paul Rudd is the comedic battery that just keeps on plugging away (and looking the same) year after year; Friendship is sort of like his old buddy comedies, but the humor and style itself is so much different, and he still gets it.  Del Toro provides a relieving dose of calm competence in One Battle...; even though you cock your head at the oddities of his character (karate sensei, hang-dog beer chugger) he gets the job done and makes you laugh without cracking a smile.  Lindo can do seemingly anything, and his role as a larger-than-life music hall legend is another new one, at least to me; he crucially helps lighten up the dark Sinners, just a bit.  Brolin has developed quite the affinity for the bad guy, and he has perhaps never done it better than in Knives Out 3; the sheer contempt for his fellows, even another priest, as well as the (seemingly) utter certainty in his mission with the craven cynicism behind it... whoa.  No one could top Sean Penn in One Battle..., though, disappearing into the role of rogue military commander with a vendetta - someone worse even, if possible, than Brolin's Father Wicks.  Penn makes Lockjaw (perfect name) into a grotesque figure, from his physical appearance to his lack of morality.  While we admittedly get little if any glimpse of humanity in him, the familiarity of his behaviors and tendencies to real humans is chilling.

Best Casting
One Battle After Another
The Roses
Sinners
Thunderbolts*
Wake Up Dead Man: Knives Out 3

Honorable mentions: Good FortuneMountainhead, Fantastic Four
Disagree w/ Oscars: Hamnet, Marty Supreme, Sinners
Oscar nominees I didn't see: The Secret Agent

This is a new category at the Oscars this year, so I am also adding it to my own awards.  I don't know exactly what the criteria are for the Oscars, but mine are: A) outstanding ensemble (4 or more notable/ especially good performances/castings); and/or B) at least 3 outstanding individual performances.  Hamnet falls short because it simply doesn't have any standout roles beyond Mescal and Buckley; Marty Supreme has a larger cast than Hamnet but again only two especially strong performances.

I am almost always highly impressed by the casting in Marvel's superhero movies, and the new Fantastic Four continues this trend, especially Pascal and Kirby's roles.  There were multiple comedies this year which, even if they didn't end up quite as good as they should have been, still deserve kudos for their casting, such as Good Fortune (Ansari as the put-upon average man; Rogen the asshole rich guy; and Reeves the kind but dumb angel - perfect!) and Mountainhead (four tech-bro assholes played excellently by Carell, Schwartzman, Youssef, and Cory Michael Smith).

A third comedy, which does make my "official" nominees list, is The Roses with its amazing casting: Cumberbatch and Colman aren't strictly comic actors but are still deliriously funny and so make excellently venomous spouses, while their best friends are played by comedians, the standout SNL alums Samberg and McKinnon.  Sinners is one of the top movies of the year, but in terms of casting, it barely makes my list.  Jordan and Lindo are the only true standouts, although enough of the supporting cast are strong and vivid that it makes the cut.  Thunderbolts* is yet another Marvel entry, and it's almost all returning characters which is cheating a bit, I suppose, but as an Avengers-type team-up movie it has an absurd number of fun - and well-developed - characters, from Pugh and Harbour's unhappy family to kinda-bad guys Louis-Dreyfus and (newcomer) Pullman and many more.  Knives Out, similarly, is famous for its large and fun casts, and Wake Up Dead Man is no different; Daniel Craig continues to lead the charge, of course, but O'Connor is as good in the 1B role here as de Armas was in the first movie, and Brolin, Close, Renner, Scott, etc. are great, too.  But it has to be One Battle After Another to take the crown: how could it not, as I have it winning Best Actor (DiCaprio), Supporting Actress (Taylor), and Supporting Actor (Penn)?  Add del Toro, phenomenal newcomer Chase Infiniti, and plenty of others, and it is jam-packed with acting excellence, a major reason that it is the best movie of the year.


Best Director
Paul Thomas Anderson (One Battle After Another)
Ryan Coogler (Sinners)
Ray Mendoza and Alex Garland (Warfare)
Jake Schreier (Thunderbolts*)
Chloe Zhao (Hamnet)

Disagree w/ Oscars: Josh Safdie (Marty Supreme)
Oscar nominees I didn't see: Joachim Trier (Sentimental Value)

Just as I love the casting in most Marvel movies, I also greatly admire much of the directing work.  Thunderbolts* was an even bigger challenge than a typical Avengers movie, since none of the truly big stars are in it.  Schreier shrewdly chooses Pugh's Yelena as his main character, though, with the rest of the massive cast with an important yet subtle part to play in illustrating and developing her character; it also balances the obligatory action scenes with strong thematic work, particularly at the end.  Sinners had to have a great director behind it to make it comprehensible, let alone high quality and electric.  Coogler does that, particularly in the first two-thirds, melding period drama with fantasy.  But, at least to my personal taste, the last third becomes too generically horror/monster-based; with a more clever, unexpected conclusion, this could have contended for best movie of the year.  Warfare is unlike anything I've seen before, a super realistic-feeling dramatization of a battle from the Iraq War.  Co-directed by one of its surviving veterans, Mendoza, along with reliable Hollywood filmmaker Garland, it captures the non-stop tension and lack of artificial flourishes in real fighting, yet paces and shoots it as riveting entertainment.  Remarkable.  Hamnet could have been, to this viewer, a fairly drowsy affair, yet another period piece that telegraphs exactly where it's going with the famous Hamlet play at the end.  Yet Zhao made a thoughtful and surprisingly brisk, straightforward yet nuanced and show-not-tell story that gripped me.  Tremendously emotional, in an honest and earned way.  Once again, though - notice a theme? - it is One Battle After Another, directed by Paul Thomas Anderson, at the top.  It is many different things, all perfectly blended together - political thriller, dark yet silly comedy, family drama, scifi(ish) dystopia - into an amazing whole.  So many different scenes leave an indelible impression on me, and even specific frames, but again, none override the others to dominate.  I think the best way to describe it is lightning in a bottle, and the director has to get the most credit for that.




Saturday, February 14, 2026

Hamnet + Send Help

 

Hamnet
Score:  A
Directed by Chloe Zhao
Starring Jessie Buckley, Paul Mescal
Running time: 126 minutes
Rated PG-13

Hamnet is an excellent historical tragedy, a story involving the world's greatest playwright but focusing on his family in more universal terms rather than serving as a biopic.  The movie is an adaptation of a 2020 novel that I'm not familiar with, but that wasn't important to understanding or enjoying the film.  Beyond not being a Shakespeare biopic, the main character is in fact Agnes, his wife.  Magnificently played by Jessie Buckley, Agnes is a fascinating person.  More or less raised as a pagan, the movie handles this beautifully: it's a major element, but complementary to (not distracting from) the more regular human drama.  Her falconry is majestic, its clear spiritual bond powerful; Agnes is a woman of nature, spending most of her time (pre-family) in the woods, where a mysterious cave is both a potent symbol on its own and has a striking connection with the play.  Agnes is also smart enough to adapt to standard domestic life of the time, inspired to do so by her love for William.  She wins over her mother-in-law and even understands better than William himself what the struggling, frustrated genius needs - even if that results in him moving away.  Agnes doesn't have much of a life of her own, but she seems to fully embrace motherhood, raising essentially by herself three wonderful children.  This is Shakespeare-based, though, and tragedy befalls the family.  I'll admit that I cried - several times - as the camera is unflinching, unsparing of any of the characters' pain which the actors marvelously and genuinely show.  It's not at all manipulative or gratuitous, and yet not numbingly depressing, either.  Finally, the movie does indulge us with an abbreviated performance of Hamlet itself, which ingeniously though subtly syncs the family's story with William's masterpiece.  I like this movie the more I think about it, even though it doesn't connect with me in especially personal or cultural (this is the 16th century, after all) ways.  It stands on its own - bravo!

---


Send Help
Score:  A-
Directed by Sam Raimi
Starring Rachel McAdams, Dylan O'Brien
Running time: 115 minutes
Rated R

Send Help is a tremendously entertaining, impressively creative new take on the deserted-island-survivor genre, a pleasant change of pace at the theater.  I should next say that you might want to defer reading the rest of this review until after you've seen the movie, as I think knowing as little as possible before will be particularly rewarding in this case.  That said, director Raimi showcases his filmmaking skills and distinctive style to great effect.  I have not seen any of his more straightforward horror movies, but even titles like Spider-Man, his Oz spinoff, and especially Doctor Strange 2 showcase a neat creepy (in a good way) vibe along with occasional jump scares.  Send Help is ideally suited for this style.  Rachel McAdams also shows an impressive range of acting, starting out as Linda, a meek, socially awkward but hardworking, successful office drone.  It's laid on thick, from close-ups on her tuna-smeared lips to her cooing to her lone companion, Sweetie the cockatiel.  The company CEO's heir, Bradley, is the only other survivor who washes ashore with Linda, and even while he completely depends on her (thanks to her literal Survivor TV prep), still treats her like dirt.  It's a pretty standard feminist scenario for turning the tables on the obnoxious, entitled bro.  Which is satisfying, yet Raimi makes it even more interesting with Linda's darker turn.  We get just a little of the obligatory "this is how they are surviving" cues, and then the movie focuses on the gripping, evolving, tense relationship between Linda and Bradley.  This is both internal and dialogue-based, but also often quite directly physical.  While you guess at motives and plans, you're treated to a breathless boar hunt, squirm-inducing interrogation, and a finale that is actually both well-earned and legitimately exciting and well-done (unlike many other movies' endings).  See this one in the theater for maximum effect, but in any event, just see it!

***

This double review represents a transition, with Hamnet likely being the final 2025-released movie I see in a theater, and Send Help being the first 2026 movie I've seen in the theater.  Fortunately for me, both are outstanding movies that were well worth the trip to the theater.  Hamnet is very near the top of my 2025 movie list (I'll be posting my 2025 movie awards/overview soon!), in many ways a fairly straightforward drama that searingly focuses on its characters.  Not a fun movie, but very rewarding.  Send Help is in fact terrifically entertaining even as it is lighter in (but not bereft of) deeper meaning.  Send Help, though, actually gives me more hope for the future of movies, as it represents a blockbuster-ish type release that is imbued with the distinctive creative stamp of a great director and is just strongly made all around, as well as being simply very entertaining.  Too many movies are launched on the basis of an interesting premise, perhaps also featuring some good/great actors, but the writing and directing is uninspired at best and overall quality - and entertainment value - mediocre or worse.  So please, please, please Hollywood - look to Send Help as a shining example of empowering the most talented filmmakers and setting them loose on the many interesting ideas waiting for the right opportunity.




* By Focus Features - https://www.focusfeatures.com/hamnet, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=81300449
** By https://dam.gettyimages.com/s/3j9twnzs3mc24f94zc9k5x, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=81341066

Saturday, January 17, 2026

Marty Supreme + Zootopia 2

 

Marty Supreme
Score:  B
Directed by Josh Safdie
Starring Timothee Chalamet, Odessa A'zion, Gwyneth Paltrow, et al
Running time: 150 minutes
Rated R

Marty Supreme is an entertaining and, in some respects, well-made dramedy that ultimately falls short of its Oscar aspirations due to an erratic story and gratuitous bad behavior.  Ostensibly, Marty is about the titular character's (Chalamet) efforts to overcome a hard scrabble background to become a table tennis world champion.  But Marty is really more interested in attention of all kinds, using and abusing those around him to get what he is immediately desperate for, which is often just petty cash.  This makes the character, and overall story, quite similar to director Safdie's Uncut Gems (which he co-directed with his brother Benny).  Starring Adam Sandler, it is an excruciatingly unpleasant movie to watch; in purely technical cinema terms, it's a decent movie, but also full of nothing but despicable behavior and cursing.  Marty Supreme is fortunately milder in its bad behavior (and language) than Gems.  At least, the bad behavior is a little better excused.  Whereas Sandler gets his just deserts, though, Marty bungles his way to unearned moral victories by the end.  There are also quite a few secondary characters and stories that pop up and disappear at random, artificially portraying them as important or well understood components in the story (hawking orange ping-pong balls; a random "best friend" played by Tyler, the Creator who drops in and back out again; etc.).  It's not all bad, by any means.  Chalamet creates a compelling, if decidedly unheroic, main character who is fun to follow, and his foibles (escaping the cops, falling through a floor in a bathtub, etc.) can be quite humorous by themselves.  It's a long movie, but decent pacing prevents it from dragging.  But Marty leaves an awful lot of wreckage in his wake, particularly for those closest to him, and to what end?  These mixed and troubling themes created (intentionally or not) by the story and characters waste some genuinely high quality elements of filmmaking that are also present.

---


Zootopia 2
Score:  B+
Directed by Jared Bush & Byron Howard
Starring Ginnifer Goodwin, Jason Bateman, Ke Huy Quan, Andy Samberg, et al
Running time: 108 minutes
Rated PG

Zootopia 2 is an entertaining, well-made animated movie that, like the original, offers far more for adult audiences than many in the genre; but it also can't quite match the first film's charm or, naturally, its originality.  The first thing that stands out to me about Z2, whether or not it's actually true, is that it feels more plot-based, and less about exploring the world and its characters than the original.  There is still some very good material in those latter categories in the sequel: in particular, the introduction of a backwater, ghetto-like reptile neighborhood, as well as continued development of the sweetly mismatched duo of Judy (Goodwin), an earnest and still rather naive bunny and Nick (Bateman), a streetwise and still rather jaded fox.  But the plot is kind of humdrum; Judy and Nick have to clear their good names while also investigating the mysteries of the maligned reptiles (hint: they're not as bad as the residents of Zootopia think).  The supporting characters, while fun to one degree or another, also aren't as strong as in the original.  The action scenes, while cleverly devised and beautifully animated, are also enjoyable, but get bogged down somewhat in the tangles of plot.  Again, a perfectly entertaining movie - for both adults, solo or parents, and children - that has Pixar-level quality in many ways, but I hope that the next one will ease up on the plotting and bask more in its vivid characters and setting.

---

I think that these two movies will probably wrap up my 2025-released theater trips (unless a few Oscar-nominated movies come to my theater closer to the Academy Awards ceremony-hopefully!).  Solid movies both, although I think both are overrated, for different reasons.  Marty Supreme is considered a Best Picture contender, which I disagree with.  Yes, it has some elements of a top movie, but too many and too significant of flaws to put it in that category (however, Chalamet is a more deserving option for Best Actor).  Meanwhile, Zootopia 2 has surged to box office heights: while it's made modestly more in the U.S. than the original, it has almost doubled its international total to $1.275 billion (thanks mostly to $610 million in China)!  It thus follows the pattern of Inside Out: the sequel makes way more money than the outstanding original, even though it isn't nearly as good (IMO).  Oh, well.  2025 was a good, though not great, year at the movies, and I'll be writing my year-in-review posts in the coming month or so.  Until then, hopefully 2026 gets off to a good start!




* By Source, A24 - impawards, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=80723175
** By Source, Disney Enterprises, Inc. - https://dam.gettyimages.com/s/nbg894c5nz2fhkg5pkfwtpg, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=77592031

Saturday, December 6, 2025

Wake Up Dead Man: Knives Out 3

 


Score:  A-
Directed by Rian Johnson
Starring Daniel Craig, Josh O'Connor, Glenn Close, Josh Brolin
Running time: 144 minutes
Rated PG-13

Long Story Short:  Wake Up Dead Man is the third movie about the complex mysteries of Daniel Craig's investigator Benoit Blanc.  Nearly as good as the original, this has the same structure but in a completely new setting and theme.  The religious struggles are appropriate both for our current society as well as a suitable foil for Blanc's (fictional) character.  It is as riveting as you hope for with tension and humor, great writing and acting abounding.  Try to see it in the theater if you can!


Jud (O'Connor), a young priest newly trained after a troubled youth, is given a challenging assignment.  The lead priest at his church, Wicks (Brolin), is a firebreather whose extreme ministry has driven out all its congregants except for a small group of followers.  Jud tries to soften Wicks's approach and counsel his flock, but on Good Friday, a shocking death occurs in the middle of mass.  The murder appears to be physically impossible, yet Jud is soon targeted as the main suspect.  Famed investigator Benoit Blanc (Craig) arrives at the scene, but even his impressive intellect and experience is put to the test in a case that seems to go beyond his agnostic area of expertise.

Wake Up Dead Man is a scintillating mystery thriller, an ideal theater trip for adults, thanks to its great writing, pacing, and cast of intriguing characters.  This is the third Knives Out mystery and it retains the broad organizational structure of its predecessors.  The overall setting of the plot is laid out first, particularly introducing the main character - in this case, Jud.  After a murder, clues are presented, most related to the varied and colorful supporting cast.  Blanc then enters the scene and after plenty of false turns, the full mystery is satisfyingly revealed at the end.  I find this structure very enjoyable, even if it results in a slightly lengthy movie (except the first, which is about perfectly timed).  Another strength of the series is that Blanc, the one recurring character, is not actually the main character.  This allows him to be more "mechanical", as the brains of the operation, with witty, even silly, scenery-chewing along with his clever detective work.  Jud, like Marta before him, is an appealing main character, very sympathetic and good-hearted even as intellectually you wonder if he might in fact be guilty.  O'Connor does great work (see also Challengers) here as the put-upon young priest.  He is genuine in his earnest attempts to do his best to help his parishioners but also retains a bit of impatience and temper from his youth.  The supporting cast doesn't quite meet the high bar of the original, but Close's priest-assisting, eerily strict Martha, Scott's goofy best-selling author, and Brolin's charismatic yet vile priest are highlights.

The plot - don't worry, I won't give away any big spoilers! - is the best of the series so far.  Its focus on the divine, on good and evil, are a perfect match - and challenge - for the evidence-based, shades-of-gray skeptic Blanc.  And it's also one that carries important messages for our modern world, providing these fully within the film's artistry rather than through some tacked-on preaching (sorry for the pun).  Wicks's angry priest rejects the modern world in his sermons with defiant certainty, going so far as to single out individuals in the pews and their (in his view) failings.  Yet in his private life, Wicks is a hypocrite, both in revealing his cynicism to Jud and in his greedy and crude "worldly" plots and actions.  Jud is his opposite.  Not an heir to his position, like Wicks, he struggled and continues to struggle against his inner demons.  The goodness that that has produced is reflected in the compassion he has for his people.  Jud is far from perfect, in both moral and competency terms, but his positive, merciful efforts are what count.  Yes, Blanc does eventually connect the bewildering dots that at first seemed divinely (or demonically) placed.  But the most interesting action in Wake Up Dead Man is the struggle, even in the midst of distracting crisis, of ordinary people between their lighter and darker natures.

***

I was thrilled to get to see Wake Up Dead Man in a movie theater!  When I heard the news years ago that Knives Out director/creator Rian Johnson would be producing two more movies - but for Netflix - I despaired that such high-quality, creative work would be trapped on the small screen.  So I was pleasantly surprised when I saw Wake Up listed in the upcoming showtimes for my local theater (this has happened a few other times in recent years for other streamers such as Apple TV's Spirited).  I think a Knives Out movie is especially valuable to see in a theater as it demands your full attention, and you just can't get that kind of focus sitting on your couch at home.  Thanks, Netflix - and please show more of your movies in theaters like this!! I don't think it got a wide release, but be sure to check the showtimes of any theaters near you.  As I mentioned last time, I'm not sure what else is coming along in the near future, but hopefully there will be more pleasant surprises soon!




* By http://www.impawards.com/2025/wake_up_dead_man_a_knives_out_mystery.html, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=80953901

Saturday, November 29, 2025

Bugonia + The Running Man

 


Bugonia

Score:  B
Directed by Yorgos Lanthimos
Starring Emma Stone, Jesse Plemons, Aidan Delbis
Running time: 118 minutes
Rated R

Bugonia is the latest from the unique director Yorgos Lanthimos, a typically odd but very well made and engaging film that has one significant downfall (IMO).  The main story is pretty straightforward in that cousins Teddy (Plemons) and Don (Delbis) kidnap a major pharmaceutical CEO, Michelle (Stone), as they are convinced that she is at the center of a dangerous conspiracy.  The movie is intriguingly made to convey tones of both very ordinary life - bees buzzing around flowers, the cousins eating dinner together, CEO Michelle doing her daily routine - as well as foreboding, consequential stakes - a score that is mostly quiet but keeps breaking into bombastic orchestral swells, tense exchanges between captors and hostage, glimpses of the cousins' "research".  This incongruity keeps you off balance, in a good way, and along with a snappy yet patient pacing, builds and maintains significant interest in the fictional mystery.  The story also serves to highlight real-world themes in meaningful yet non-preachy ways.  Teddy, a genius, has clearly been sucked into the online abyss of conspiracy theories and is utterly convinced of his conclusions.  His intensity and rage is understandably heightened, though, by the very real health effects that Michelle's company had on his family, whose financial means are modest at best.  Michelle, on the other hand, certainly does not deserve captivity, even though she pushes her company's research ruthlessly and cares little for others, including her own employees.  So the film provides a nuanced perspective on modern issues, but this does not overwhelm the central dramatic elements, which are carried out marvelously by the actors, particularly Stone and Plemons.  **WARNING: SPOILERS AHEAD!!!**  What brings the movie down quite a bit for me is the bizarre final act: Teddy was right about his bonkers theories and at the end, literally every human simply dies (Earth is otherwise untouched).  This ending seems to spit on the great work that had been done all the way up to that point which is quite unfortunate.  Still, I admire Lanthimos, the actors, and the whole crew's efforts.

***



The Running Man

Score:  C
Directed by Edgar Wright
Starring Glen Powell, Josh Brolin, et al
Running time: 133 minutes
Rated R

The Running Man is a remake, likely chosen to resurface today due to obvious parallels with the modern world, but comes off as ham-handed and only mildly diverting.  Glen Powell plays the lead, Ben, a regular joe in a world of poverty who seizes an opportunity to join a sadistic show in which he must survive a "game" of hide-and-seek for one month to win a jackpot.  Powell is clearly Hollywood's main hope to be the next big movie star but the problem is - IMO - he just doesn't have the charismatic alchemy, the raw talent of previous stars (Cruise, Hanks, Clooney, Redford, etc.).  Certainly he's better than duds like Tatum or Wahlberg, but not special enough to make a good film great, or a poor one watchable.  Of course, he's not helped by a poor script here that makes it impossible for him to create a stable, consistent, believable (or even sympathetic) hero.  The movie also falls prey to the danger of trying to create a fake media company and show.  As the kids say, these attempts usually come off very cringe to me, ending any suspension of disbelief I might otherwise maintain.  Sure, Brolin and Domingo are very talented and fun actors, but they are wasted here in their roles.  All of the other supporting characters are lazily written (and sometimes poorly acted) tropes, particularly latecomer Amelia, shoehorned in right when the movie really comes off the tracks.  Yes, there are plenty of legitimate societal problems that this movie tries to highlight, from some (keyword there!) elements of the media to economic inequality.  But this movie does not artfully or effectively illustrate any of them.  If you're really desperate for an action movie in the theater, sure, you'll find some scenes to enjoy here.  Otherwise, skip.

***

My November movie theater trips were not as successful as I hoped, unfortunately, so the fall movie season has taken a downward turn after the awesome One Battle After Another and very solid Good Fortune.  I have significantly divergent takeaways from these latest two films, though.  I am determined to continue watching movies made by great directors like Lanthimos, as that's where the most interesting creativity is consistently coming from in Hollywood these days - even if they don't always fully live up to the high expectations.  The Running Man, on the other hand, illustrates a continuing degradation of at least one track of the action/blockbuster genre - and a severe decline in my interest in even trying them.  I still enjoy the action/adventure genre overall (and especially subgenres like superheroes), but I am getting pickier.  I don't have a lot of movies I'm looking forward to in the next few months, as it seems kids' movies (well, Zootopia 2 might be worth trying) and the next Avatar sequel (I thought the original was overrated and haven't even seen the second) dominate for the next month or so.  But in a pleasant surprise, my local theater is playing the new Knives Out movie next week (I thought this was only on Netflix, so what's going on?!?!  Hopefully this is a growing trend!!!) - so I'll be back again soon.




* By Focus Features - http://www.impawards.com/2025/bugonia.html, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=80887446
** By Paramount Pictures - https://www.movieposters.com/products/running-man-mpw-149867, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=80330198

Saturday, October 25, 2025

Good Fortune


Score:  B/B+

Directed by Aziz Ansari
Starring Aziz Ansari, Keanu Reeves, Seth Rogen, Keke Palmer
Running time: 97 minutes
Rated R

Long Story Short:  Good Fortune is a very solid and entertaining comedy, a genre that is becoming rare in theaters these days.  Aziz Ansari, in his directing debut, is the creative force behind it all, and he shows that he can be a strong leader in the industry if given the chance.  It's not all as smooth as you might hope, but the three well-chosen leads bring their talents to an old premise (life switcheroo) that is reinvigorated by a very appropriate combination with today's economic turbulence.  Definitely see it if you're a fan of the actors involved, or simply want an amusing and thought-provoking outing.


Arj (Ansari) is struggling.  With dreams of becoming a filmmaker, he is stuck barely keeping himself afloat with part-time, frustrating jobs.  In a stroke of luck, he has been watched by a guardian angel, Gabriel (Reeves), who takes pity on him and in a flash, completely changes his life circumstances.  Arj is not the only one affected by Gabriel's intervention, however, and not everyone is as happy about the new situation.  The difference between Arj and Gabriel's ultimate goals quickly becomes clear, yet they must figure out a way to work with each other in order to restore balance - for everyone.

Good Fortune is an intriguing and entertaining debut film for comedian Aziz Ansari, one that shows a lot of potential in his creativity but also some of the rougher edges of a newcomer.  The basic premise, in which two main characters' lives are switched and they learn more about themselves and others by doing so, is not new, but Ansari has clever takes on it and uses it for some effective modern social commentary.  The cast is also almost ideal for the roles, though not particularly a showcase for anyone's talents.  Ansari's Arj is a kind of version of his Parks & Rec role, striving yet frequently frustrated, but also knows how to have a good time when he gets the chance.  Rogen, as an asshole tech investor, is also a nitwit and benefits from the actor's jolly charm to be more sympathetic than expected.  And Reeves is a major nitwit, playing up the actor's half-serious reputation; this is the only hammed-up part in the movie, although Gabriel gets a handful of poignant moments, too.  Unfortunately, Keke Palmer's tremendous talents are mostly wasted here (see her true abilities in One of Them Days) - she's forced to be way too much of the "straight" woman, and you can almost feel her itching to break out of it.

The life-switching premise is very interesting, if at times a bit too on-the-nose, in its combination with today's radically unequal economic system.  Good Fortune is particularly good at showing the struggle of today's "hustle" economy; it's like watching someone run as fast as they can on a treadmill but still get pulled backwards, inexorably.  Not that there aren't small moments of pleasure or at least breaks, especially in commiserating with those around you (Palmer's Elena).  The movie also pokes fun effectively at the lifestyle of the rich and careless (a sauna-ice plunge cycle is especially funny).  Seeing the roles get reversed is satisfying, and Ansari is wise to be upfront in showing how much his Arj loves it, while Rogen's Jeff is furious - particularly after Gabriel reveals his trick.  The structure of this is all good, with plenty of strong moments.  But the film also suffers from some uneven or jarring pacing issues.  As noted above, the social commentary can often be a little too direct, particularly in the dialogue - as if Ansari wasn't sure if the audience was getting it by just watching.  It also has plenty of chuckle-humor, but few belly laughs or bravura scenes.  So, the execution doesn't quite (or consistently) match the potential of Ansari's ideas here, but it's still well worth a watch.

***

I immediately knew that I wanted to see Good Fortune after first seeing the trailer, as I really like Aziz Ansari - from his role on Parks & Rec to his Netflix show to some of his standup.  The neat premise, along with strong co-stars in Reeves and Rogen, were icing on the cake.  While Ansari's skills as a filmmaker need some further developing - not surprising for anyone new to it - the movie did turn out to be both very enjoyable and thought-provoking, a not-too-common combination to find on screen.  Along with Tim Robinson's Friendship from May, I am hopeful that Hollywood will both continue to give top talent like Ansari and Robinson the chance to bring their unique perspectives and ideas to film (not just acting but also writing/directing) - and also make sure it gets into theaters.  I'm not sure what is up next for me in theaters, but as we get deeper into the fall there will hopefully be more and more (non-horror) things to watch.  Stay tuned!




* By Source, Lionsgate - http://www.impawards.com/2025/good_fortune_ver9.html, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=80076451