Monday, June 6, 2022

Top Gun: Maverick

 


Score:  A

Directed by Joseph Kosinski
Starring Tom Cruise, Miles Teller, Jennifer Connelly, Jon Hamm
Running time: 131 minutes
Rated PG-13

Long Story Short:  Top Gun: Maverick revives an obsolete relic of the past, turning the idea of a dated 80s blockbuster into the most exciting theatrical experience in years.  Tom Cruise is still at the helm, and he continues to push the boundaries of the stunt work that he has been hard at work on in the last few years.  The flight scenes - from mere training exercises to pulse-quickening dog fights - are more than worth the price of admission alone.  But the entire thing, human dramatic elements included, is very well done.  This is a must-see.


Decades into a successful career in the Navy, Captain Pete "Maverick" Mitchell (Cruise) is still flying planes - and faster than ever before.  He is recalled to the Top Gun training school, however, when an international threat emerges.  With more combat experience than anyone else, Maverick's superiors grudgingly acknowledge that the rebellious ace is the man to teach the newest generation of pilots how to do the job.  While he quickly finds himself at ease in the cockpit, Maverick finds both challenges and opportunities lingering from his past that complicate the situation.  Time is the enemy, however, and Maverick must confront both the angels and the demons of his past in order to meet the challenges of the present.

Top Gun: Maverick is among the best blockbuster films of recent years, an excellent sequel to an iconic 80s hit, combining "old-fashioned" filmmaking with jaw-dropping stunt work and intense action.  While I only vaguely recall the original, Maverick shares much of its basic DNA but it moderates the formula in subtle but important ways.  While Maverick is still an insanely good pilot, his human flaws are highlighted; there is greater gender and racial diversity among the young pilots; and the U.S.A.-vs.-them attitude is muted, focusing less on the anonymous adversary than on their own inner demons.  Similarly, the soundtrack has plenty of callbacks to the 80s movie, but not overwhelmingly so.  It is quite effective in helping bring back certain memories and feelings in some moments, but also works to build overall tension in the action through a more modern sound as well.  A few great needle-drops can't help but bring a big smile to your face, though, too.

While high-speed aerial action is the main goal here, the dramatic elements and even sense of humor are also surprisingly effective.  The key relationship in the film is between Maverick and Rooster, the son of Goose, Mav's co-pilot who died in the original.  It's a familiar dynamic, the young up-and-comer resentful of the veteran with family connections, but still powerful.  It also goes well with an even better element, the film's exploration of Maverick himself.  While he's unmatched in the skies, the movie makes quite plain that Maverick is just like the rest of us down on the ground.  Whether it's awkward encounters with his commanders or visible pain and pleasure as the past comes back to haunt the present, Maverick is a flawed hero, and much more sympathetic as such.  The writers also wisely add humor throughout to break up the tension and let you know it's not taking itself too seriously.  The opening training session in which Maverick puts the whippersnappers in their place (and sends them to the tarmac doing pushups) is great.  My favorite, though, is one that occurs right in the middle of the finale - a risky change in tone, but one that pays off handsomely.

Best of all, of course, is the action, with phenomenal aerial stunt work that simply demands to be seen in a theater.  You feel like you are in the cockpit with these pilots - because you literally are!  The actors grunt and shout authentically according to their situation, as both the tension and the G-forces rise.  I found myself twisting in my own seat, reacting to the jarring rolls left and right during death-defying races just above the ground and to the unpredictability of battle.  Each flight scene is great, and the overall flow of the film is, too - the intensity of these scenes increases steadily throughout.  But while you think you may be ready for the finale by the time it arrives, that you have already seen it all - you ain't seen nothing yet.  The ending is a well-earned triumph, not lingering too long yet addressing all the personal elements that have been patiently developed along the way, further boosted by the exhilaration of the ride.

***

Top Gun: Maverick is an unqualified success, the first great movie of the year I've seen.  While I have reservations about the man, it's undeniable that Tom Cruise is dedicated to his craft.  Not every actor or movie needs to attempt the same audacious stunts, but studios could take a lesson from his example and invest in those with similar vision and passion for film.  I am as big a fan of the Marvel movies as anyone else, but it's essential that Hollywood develop a healthier, more diverse ecosystem of films than just relying on the uber-popular genre of the moment.  I commend Cruise for his support of the theatrical movie experience and his production of art that takes full advantage of the medium.  Hopefully, this is just the beginning of a renaissance in the industry, streaming be damned.



* By http://www.impawards.com/2022/top_gun_maverick_ver5.html, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=70039658

Saturday, May 21, 2022

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness

 

Score: A-
Directed by Sam Raimi
Starring Benedict Cumberbatch, Elisabeth Olsen, Xochitl Gomez, Benedict Wong, Rachel McAdams
Running time: 126 minutes
Rated PG-13

Long Story Short:  The sequel to Marvel’s introduction to the world of fantasy in Doctor Strange delivers both spectacular effects and moving character moments.  With Wanda alongside as his co-star, Cumberbatch’s Strange is again a very enjoyable lead with Olsen providing a nice counter.  The plot moves fast, but hang in there and you’ll enjoy the ride!  Highly recommended for theater viewing.


While attending the wedding of former flame, Christine (McAdams), Steven Strange (Cumberbatch), aka Doctor Strange, rushes to the rescue as a monster rampages in New York.  He and the Sorcerer Supreme, Wong (Wong), discover that the monster was searching for one individual in particular - and neither the monster nor the person are from their universe.  Strange calls on Wanda Maximoff (Olsen), a witch with powerful abilities, for help.  But where Strange sees the danger of other beings entering their universe, Wanda sees the promise of reconnecting with parts of her past that have been ripped away.

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness continues in the tradition of strong Marvel films, thanks, as usual, not just to top-of-the-line visual effects but moreso from its compelling characters.  As the title itself reveals, the central theme of this sequel is the widening Marvel exploration of the “multiverse”, a reality in which there are many, perhaps infinite, universes existing side by side but entirely separate from each other outside of extraordinary events.  As the Disney+ show Loki and film Spider-Man 3 have already shown, this allows for alternate versions of the same characters and the interesting questions and dilemmas that poses.  Doctor Strange 2 also follows in the Marvel tradition of dabbling in another genre: here, we get a taste of horror along with our superheroes.  This is effectively, appropriately, and even amusingly-done, from a version of a serial killer chase, to a few gorier-than-typical-Marvel scenes, to even some zombies!  Much of this is in the middle portion of the film, which to me was the weakest.  It veers a bit too generic at some points, with effects and multiverse madness occasionally overriding the characters or just the Marvel cleverness we’ve come to expect.  Still, it’s well-paced throughout, and book-ended by a strong opening and finale.

Even in what is among the most visually spectacular Marvel films (which is saying something), Doctor Strange 2 still finds its greatest strength in its characters.  While some critics may tire of the Marvel films, what the long series of films - and now streaming series, too - has created is an extraordinarily rich and deep set of characters.  Wanda gets the most powerful part, following on the standout WandaVision.  The plot aligns neatly with the conclusion to that series, and further explores Wanda’s internal struggle between her light and dark natures.  Somewhat overshadowed by that, Doctor Strange still gets plenty to work with as he struggles with a relationship never realized and his deep-seated impulse to win no matter the cost.  Among others, America (Gomez) is a fun new character, though with much remaining to be explored, Benedict Wong is a welcome returning, sober foil to the sarcastic Strange, and there are several interesting cameos.

While I do truly value the characters above all, the visuals and action still deserve mention.  Effects work is used to create multiple new worlds, as well as several scenes on “our” Earth, and they are all impressive as well as believable.  Standing out to me was a “lost” world where buildings literally drift slowly through an ever-present fog, and rising waters lap wherever you go.  There is plenty of action, of course, and while I often prefer the hand-to-hand, practical fights, this is great and varied stuff.  Particularly good are the opening monster fight in New York and a literally musical duel between Stranges. That battle leads into the ending, which is one of the strongest in the Marvel franchise.  As mentioned, the middle was a somewhat mixed bag to me, but both the plot and the character arcs are resolved in very satisfying ways, and succinctly (at 2 hours and 6 minutes, this qualifies as a “short” blockbuster these days).  But there is also much remaining to be explored, of course - and after this, I’m excited as ever for it!

***

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness was a great way to start the summer, in the usual first weekend of May spot.  Six films after the last Avengers movie, Marvel is clearly going strong - I am certainly not tiring of it and, based on the continued box office success, neither is the public at large.  Even for non-fans, you can be confident that a Marvel movie will provide a quality, entertaining blockbuster experience, which is otherwise hardly assured.  Doctor Strange 2 also revived my faith that Hollywood can make good endings, after a number of rough conclusions for this year’s films.  Next up, I’m excited for the Top Gun remake/sequel, Jurassic World part 3 after that, and hopefully plenty more fun this summer!



* By http://www.impawards.com/2022/doctor_strange_in_the_multiverse_of_madness_ver5.html, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=69573491

Saturday, April 30, 2022

Double Review: Everything Everwhere All At Once & Fantastic Beasts Part 3

 




Score:  B+

Directed by Daniels (Dan Kwan and Daniel Scheinert)
Starring Michelle Yeoh, Stephanie Hsu, Ke Huy Quan
Running time: 139 minutes
Rate R

This is one of the strangest, most unique films I've seen in a long time - particularly in a movie theater.  On the surface, it's just your run-of-the-mill, numbingly complex parallel universe sci-fi story.  But in fact, it's more focused on the characters, led by Michelle Yeoh's desperate laundromat owner, Evelyn, who is at a breaking point in her relationships with husband Waymond (Ke Huy Quan-Short Round from Indiana Jones!) and daughter Joy (the film's most entertaining actor, Stephanie Hsu).  The mechanics of the sci-fi world are barely explained - probably for the best, though you feel like you're about to fly off the roller coaster several times.  Fortunately, there is an absurd sense of humor throughout the film to keep it light, highlighted by strange physical "movements" required to universe "hop" and Evelyn's appalled but earnest early reactions to the craziness she finds herself thrown into.  By the end, there is enough development of characters and relationships to create some touching moments, though to me, the sheer fantastical, dream-like quality of the (many) settings prevented a full acceptance.  Still, if you're looking for something different, look no further.  This is entertaining and worth a watch, especially in a theater.

-----


Score:  B

Directed by David Yates
Starring Eddie Redmayne, Jude Law, Mads Mikkelsen, Dan Fogler
Running time: 142 minutes
Rated PG-13

Although the magic has largely dissipated in the Fantastic Beasts series of films, based in the world of Harry Potter, there is still an entertaining time to be had.  To me, the films highlight just how important the Hogwarts school of magic setting was to the success of the books, as well as the strength of its central three characters.  The Secrets of Dumbledore continues the FB saga's exploration of the evil Grindelwald's rise, simultaneous with Dumbledore's prime.  FB does have some fun elements; I enjoy most of the titular magical creatures, and even more, the Muggle Jacob is the highlight of the series (Fogler is always excellent in the role).  But the central story and conflict is too similar to Voldemort, with a not-too-subtle nod toward real-world parallels.  I will say, though, that this third installment marks a significant improvement on part two.  The central plot is a more suitably magic-driven one, and while there is plenty of action, it is more thoughtful and creative, and less mindlessly violent than the previous film.  In the end, though, while Redmayne's Newt is fun, he's still much more suited as a supporting player; he's no Harry.

***

These two films wrapped up the spring film season in the movie theater for me; two very different films indeed.  I hope to see more films of the type that these two represent overall.  For Everything Everywhere All At Once, it was a - major - change of pace, something both thoughtful and entertaining.  I don't think I agree with the critics' 97% approval on Rotten Tomatoes, but it is certainly good - and worth a rewatch, for sure.  But I also look forward to the more familiar worlds of various franchises, represented in The Secrets of Dumbledore.  In particular, I'm excited for Marvel's summer offerings via Doctor Strange and Thor sequels.  The year in movies has been uneven so far, so I'm hoping for a strong summer ahead!


* By https://a24films.com/films/everything-everywhere-all-at-once, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=69511486

*By http://www.impawards.com/2022/fantastic_beasts_the_secrets_of_dumbledore_ver21.html, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=70190605

Saturday, April 9, 2022

The Lost City

 

Score:  B

Directed by Adam and Aaron Nee
Starring Sandra Bullock, Channing Tatum, Daniel Radcliffe
Running time: 112 minutes
Rated PG-13

Long Story Short:  The Lost City is a bit of a blast from the past: a non-franchise action comedy driven by the popularity of its stars.  The actors do their jobs well, for the most part, with Bullock, Tatum, and Radcliffe all seeming to have a great time.  But to me, this was yet another film with a great start held back by a disappointing turn toward formula in the back half.  Still, there are some really entertaining, funny, and creative scenes in the first half that make this worth a viewing.


Loretta Sage (Bullock) is one of the world's most popular romance writers, but she's just about had it.  She drags her (uncomfortable) heels through her latest book tour, where she is joined by her frequent cover model, Alan (Tatum).  In the midst of the tour, however, the plot twists when an unhinged heir named Fairfax (Radcliffe) kidnaps her.  He sees something real in her lurid fiction and drags the bewildered author on an adventure.  What Fairfax is not counting on, however, is the loyalty of her publicist (Randolph), or the bumbling nosiness of Alan.  Loretta has found herself in the middle of a plot worthy of her best books - and now she has to find her way back out.

The Lost City is an enjoyable movie, driven by its premise and strong performances; sadly, it's limited by a weaker second half.  I don't usually go see anything with a whiff of rom-com like this, but given the right ingredients, I'll give it a try, for a change of pace.  The actors certainly do their part in this one.  Sandra Bullock is as much a star as ever; she gets to be both a realistic, put-upon and thoughtful creative-type and also a more kinetic, down-and-dirty action hero (kind of), and somehow she makes it fit in one character.  Channing Tatum is more of a surprise; I've never thought much of him, but he is convincing and likable as a doofus (in the first half, at least; more later).  And Daniel Radcliffe continues to put Harry Potter as far behind him as he can, giving us an over-the-top but enjoyable villain.  There are several good supporting roles, too, notably Da'Vine Joy Randolph's tough publicist.  But Brad Pitt isn't one of them.  Sure, the character type is fun, but I am so sick of Pitt playing the "cool guy".

Like several other movies this year, The Lost City is a Jekyll & Hyde creation, strong at first but a let down later on.  It starts quickly, letting Bullock lead the way in establishing her grumpy author and providing a hilarious showcase scene of her and Tatum in a book tour interview show.  It isn't long before the action moves to the titular, volcanic island-based Lost City, and we get an extended chase sequence that's really two uproarious scenes following Tatum's Alan - first alongside Pitt, and then Bullock.  Tatum is so fun in this first half, stealing the show; it's a well-written part, and he's committed.  But the second half turns toward a much more conventional rom-com style - especially, and most disappointingly, with Tatum transforming from lovable dolt to boring action hero.  On reflection, it does make some sense - the movie itself turning into the kind of corny romantic adventure that Sage used to write.  But it also would have been fine to keep it going like the first half, and to me, much preferable.

***

The Lost City did turn out to be a nice palate cleanser, a light entertainment that was about the opposite of the dark The Batman.  Its 75% on Rotten Tomatoes is about right, I'd say; I'm not exactly the target demographic for it, and those more inclined to it will probably rate it more highly than me.  Even better, I'm happy to see it do pretty well at the box office.  The pandemic, of course, took a wrecking ball to the movie theater, and it's still an open question as to when and how that business will recover.  While I love seeing the blockbusters in theaters - that's what drove me there in the first place - it's important to have as diverse a selection of movies available as possible.  It'll take time, but hopefully as more people feel safe to go back out - and want to get away from their lonely home screens - we'll get more of it.  Give this a try, especially for a date night!  




* By http://www.impawards.com/2022/lost_city_ver2.html, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=69527903

Sunday, March 27, 2022

The Batman

 


Score:  B+

Directed by Matt Reeves
Starring Robert Pattinson, Zoe Kravitz, Jeffrey Wright, Paul Dano
Running time: 176 minutes
Rated PG-13

Long Story Short:  The Batman brings the famed hero back to theaters, this time with Robert Pattinson wearing the cape and Matt Reeves (Planet of the Apes reboot) behind the camera.  It's darker than any of its predecessors, both in aesthetics - a grimy but impressive Gotham - and a view of the city's "legitimate" leaders being as bad as the super villains.  It's well produced, along with a strong cast and good action scenes - but it's also too long, with accompanying problems of pacing.  Still, it's well worth a trip to the theaters to catch this blockbuster.


Gotham City has fallen into decay despite the best efforts of slain philantropist Thomas Wayne; his son, Bruce (Pattinson), tries to hold the darkness at bay via his vigilante identity as the Batman.  A new criminal has begun targeting high-profile individuals and leaves messages for the Batman.  While he is helped by officer James Gordon (Wright), Batman seems to have more respect from the deranged new threat than from Gotham's suspicious authorities.  As Batman tracks Gotham's latest menace, he learns more about the city itself - as well as his own family history - that leads him to question his mission.

The Batman is a strong return for DC's most famous superhero, entertaining and well-produced in many ways; however, it's held back by a gratuitous running time.  The character is more familiar to movie audiences than any other superhero, with the exception of Spider-Man, and so - as it was with the MCU's Spidey - it's crucial to strongly distinguish a new version.  Certain elements, notably the character's origins, are almost too well-known, and so The Batman wisely spends little time on this.  It does, though, have an interesting new (to me) twist on Wayne family history.  Gotham itself is practically a main character - more later - and its look and feel is one of the best parts of the movie: a dark, grimy place, yet teeming with life and energy, too.  Batman's new costume is suitably cool, along with gadgets both new and familiar; the Batmobile is the most down-to-earth and raw version yet, rumbling loudly with untamed power.  Speaking of sound, Batman gets another great theme and soundtrack, this time from Michael Giacchino.  The setting is very important for Batman, and this movie creates a good one.

The plot works nicely on two levels: one, it forces Batman into detective mode (a distinctive yet often overlooked ability), and two, it digs into the history and corrupt power structure of Gotham.  Bruce Wayne is in fact one of the least interesting characters here, which is both a knock on the writing and praise for the supporting cast.  Batman's two main allies, officer (not yet commissioner) Gordon and Selina (aka Catwoman, though they never call her that), are a lot of fun and played very well by Wright and Kravitz.  The bad guys - there are plenty of them - are also intriguing, especially an unrecognizable Colin Farrell as the Penguin, here a mere mob lieutenant.  There is plenty of action to go with the mental games, and even though most of it is shot in darkness, it is surprisingly coherent and watchable.  It's also satisfying; Batman is no super kung-fu master here, relying more on brute force and some trusty armor, taking almost as much punishment as he dishes out.  An opening melee with a gang sets the tone, but we also get some flashier sets, like an exhilarating nighttime highway chase.

The main problem with The Batman is that it is significantly too long, however.  It's not that there are any obviously superfluous parts, but the overall pacing is consistently slow, meaning each scene is pretty long - even those that shouldn't be.  Part of the reason for this goes, I think, to another weakness: reliance on the structure of the genre's gold standard, The Dark Knight.  The Riddler's crimes (if not his motives) are quite close to the Joker's; of course, there's no way that this new villain can measure up to Ledger's legendary performance, so this is a losing battle.  I won't enumerate them all, but there are plenty of other striking resemblances, to Batman Begins as well.  While The Batman visually and sonically creates a great, distinctive new world for its hero, the structure of events and even many details are a little too familiar.  Trying to measure up to its impressive predecessors, it hits all the "necessary" beats but a little more urgency would have helped.

***

The Batman is the best movie of the (still-young) year I've seen so far, and a good and worthy addition to the franchise.  I waffled between a "B+" and an "A-" for way too long on this movie - and I still may go  back on it later.  It's one of those movies that has so much good in it, it feels wrong to give it less than an "A-" - yet it has significant enough flaws in it that it also shouldn't get the same grade as other movies at that level.  Still, I'd much rather see that kind of film than what I'd call the *shrug* movie - which doesn't make much of an argument for OR against itself.  While there are disposable scenes I'll want to skip through on repeat viewings, there are about as many that I'll eagerly look forward to seeing again.  Give me more like this - though, maybe not so long, please.



* By https://www.the-numbers.com/images/movies/opusdata/Batman-The-(2021).jpg, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=69028880

Saturday, March 26, 2022

2020-21 On Your Left Film Years-In-Review

2020-21 On Your Left Film Year-in-Review

It feels like more than two years since I last wrote a year-in-review post, but then, more has happened in those two years than usually does in five, ten, or even twenty "normal" years.  I count myself as blessed to have made it through those two years with my life, health, and livelihood; movies seem like a small thing in comparison.  But I remain passionate about movies, and I was excited to return - cautiously - to theaters in 2021.  I'm therefore also happy to bring back this annual blog post, this year with a small modification: I am including the few films I got to see in 2020 before the pandemic (or those I saw at home in lockdown, by streaming).  I saw a somewhat different mix of movies than usual, though if anything, I'm surprised at how close it came to "normal", all things considered.

If it ain't broke (and I don't think it is), then I'm not fixing it, so the structure of this post will look the same as in years past:
  • Top 10 films of the year!
  • Most underrated/overrated films
  • Most surprising/disappointing films
  • Worst film of the year
  • List of other films I saw in theaters (with links to my reviews)
  • Films I saw on streaming
Please check out my companion post here, which is more like my Oscar-style awards.  There were definitely some great films released in the last two years, so I hope you'll check some of these out!


Top 10 Films of 2020-21

10. Eternals (Directed by Chloe Zhao; starring Gemma Chan, Richard Madden, Salma Hayek, Angelina Jolie, Kumail Nanjiani, et. al.)

Marvel had a lot of movies pent up during the pandemic, releasing four new ones in theaters in 2021.  Eternals made a modest (by Marvel standards) $165 million in North America, and a shockingly low 47% critical approval rating.  I mostly attribute this to it being quite a bit different than other MCU movies; ironic, since critics whine constantly that they are so tired of Marvel movies.  It isn't perfect, but Oscar-winning director Zhao makes the central, crucial decision to focus on the individual struggles and relations in this tale of epic mythology.  The performances are all solid and the action is good; but the primary draws are its fresh perspective and detour from recent Marvel plotting.

9. Palm Springs (Directed by Max Barbakow; starring Andy Samberg, Cristin Milioti, J.K. Simmons)

I did not see many new comedies during the last two years, continuing a trend, but this one - released only on streaming, appropriately - was one of the best.  Another spin on the Groundhog Day premise, Palm Springs finds its strengths in a surface tone of droll desolation that eventually gives way to true emotional connection with the two stars, played by Samberg and Milioti.  Samberg, who I enjoyed on the great Brooklyn Nine-Nine, is a perfect match for his part and Milioti is every bit as good or better.  The pacing and total running time (90 minutes) are well crafted for the premise, starting with plenty of silly and quirky hijinks before transitioning to more poignant material.  A nice little gem.

8. Tie: West Side Story (Directed by Steven Spielberg) and In the Heights (Directed by Jon M. Chu)

Despite superficial similarities - these are both musicals set in New York City featuring Hispanic communities - there are many more differences, from the plots to the tones, not least because they premiered on stages fifty years apart.  But I can't help but think of them together and the impression that they are both very good, but not great, musical adaptations.  Each has its strengths; In the Heights's plot naturally has more resonance for a modern audience and its characters are unique, far from any stereotypes though the acting can be uneven.  West Side Story has a powerful, timeless story and some terrific performances (especially DeBose and Faist) despite some characters now feeling a little too familiar.  What they both have are tremendous music and dance choreography, guaranteed to entertain any audience.  Try them both - and see how the genre has evolved.

7. The Lost Daughter (Directed by Maggie Gylenhaal; starring Olivia Coleman, Jessie Buckley, Dakota Johnson, Ed Harris)

While The Lost Daughter does not have much of a plot to it and it's quite heavy, it's also much better than another movie that shares those characteristics, The Power of the Dog.  Olivia Colman does phenomenal work as the lonely vacationer Leda; she is prickly and rough around the edges, but combined with flashbacks, we get such a clear, searing picture of this character that both the positive and the negative are understandable.  Its rumination on the joys and challenges, to understate it, of modern mother- and womanhood are powerful; and its accompanying point about the failures of men is fresher and more subtle than the one made in the previously mentioned Oscar nominee.  Not a cheerful film, but an important, compelling, and very well-made one.

6. Dune (Directed by Denis Villeneuve; starring Timothy Chalamee, Rebecca Ferguson, Oscar Isaac, Jason Momoa, Stellan Skarsgard)

Villeneuve is one of my favorite contemporary directors (Prisoners, Sicario, Arrival, etc.), so when I saw that he was filming an adaptation of this sci-fi classic, I made sure to read the book first to prepare.  The story definitely benefits from the filmmaker's strengths of creating unique, eerie atmospheres directly from the sounds and images before you even get to the characters or plot.  Zimmer doesn't quite get to the sonic heights of Villeneuve's late collaborator Johannsson but it's still strong, as are the effects; and the desert world is appropriately spellbinding.  If anything, I wish that it was even more subtle though I can see how that could have confused those who haven't read the novel; and there's a bit too much action (Momoa, really? Sigh).  But I'm nitpicking; if you're not a superhero fan, this is the 2021 blockbuster to see.

5. Downhill (Directed by Nat Faxon and Jim Rash; starring Will Ferrell, Julia Louis-Dreyfus)

The terrible critical score (37% on RT) almost dissuaded me from seeing this, but Ferrell and Louis-Dreyfus was a combo too good to pass up - and I'm glad I didn't.  The dry humor is something Louis-Dreyfus has shown a knack for in Veep, but Downhill takes it to another level entirely.  It's really a dramedy split equally between the drama and comedy, and arguably even more effective at the former.  One Ferrell-Louis-Dreyfus confrontation, with their friends as tortured observers, is both one of the most painfully awkward and simply amazing scenes I've seen in years.  It takes a little while for the film to warm up - or, more accurately, chill down - or maybe the audience just needs time to acclimate to the style.  Either way, prepare yourself for a new experience - and a treat.

4. Black Widow (Directed by Cate Shortland; starring Scarlett Johansson, Florence Pugh, Rachel Weisz, David Harbour)

Although the wait for her own movie was too long and it doesn't advance the overall MCU narrative, Black Widow is essential for any superhero fan and a fun blockbuster for anyone else.  Despite already knowing the fates of certain characters and related plots, the movie provides a great balance of a rich exploration of Johansson's character, Natasha, as well as introducing fun new characters for this background and development.  Johansson - who's always done rock-solid work - is joined by the impressive trio of Pugh, Weisz, and Harbour.  The action is largely grounded, a nice change from other recent MCU films, but as intense and hard-hitting as Winter Soldier or Civil War.  As a bonus, it's surprisingly funny, too.  Not as flashy as its kin, but very, very few are better made than Black Widow.

3. The Trial of the Chicago 7 (Directed by Aaron Sorkin; starring Eddie Redmayne, Sacha Baron Cohen, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Mark Rylance, et. al.)

I wish I could have seen this in theaters; but, I'm also happy that anyone can see it now on Netflix.  I am a huge Aaron Sorkin fan, particularly his writing (The West Wing, The Social Network, etc.) but he's now even a great director, too, first with Molly's Game and now this.  Similar to his previous film, Trial illustrates a historic moment by placing the main action in the aftermath.  There are only a handful of flashbacks to the Democratic Convention riots of 1968, but they are very powerfully done, a mixture of sparse but potent writing, crescendoing tension, and a perfectly complementary soundtrack.  The ensemble cast is just phenomenal, getting the absolute best out of such a wide range of actors who are both fun and funny as hell, especially in the trial scenes.  And Sorkin also brings out emotion from history like past titans Lincoln and Selma; there's a cathartic good-guys-vs.-bad-guys element, but it ends with a poignant reminder that the true stakes of the story involved those who never got a say in their own fate.

2. Spider-Man: No Way Home (Directed by Jon Watts; starring Tom Holland, Zendaya, Benedict Cumberbatch, Alfred Molina, et. al.)

Endgame marked the conclusion of not just a 20-film, 11-year overarching plot in the MCU, but also the Avengers superhero team as we knew it.  Of course, the MCU continues, but there has been a significant vacuum where the "Originals" - Iron Man, Captain America, and Thor - once led.  No Way Home doesn't try to replace them, exactly, but it takes up the MCU's emotional helm and, seemingly, has given it a definite new narrative direction, too.  Parker and his friends and family are given their most potent drama in this, their third outing, including a unique, breathtaking final sacrifice.  We also get teased the, well, infinite future possibilities of the multiverse.  Oh, and speaking of multiverse, No Way Home shatters the fourth (fifth?) wall by incorporating characters (played by the original actors) from other Spidey movies - those starring Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield.  Balancing all of this required an Avengers-level high wire act and everyone from the director, to writers, to cast, to crew pulled it off beautifully.  A triumph that confidently announces the MCU will not be fading away any time soon.

1. Belfast (Directed by Kenneth Branagh; starring Jude Hill, Caitriona Balfe, Jamie Dornan, Judi Dench, Ciaran Hinds)

Belfast was the first Oscar hopeful (now a confirmed multi-nominee) I'd seen in a movie theater in almost two years, and it was so good that it seemed to me a sign of hope for the future.  I knew, in addition to the awards buzz, that it was based on acclaimed director Branagh's upbringing during the Troubles - beyond that, I was simply hungry for a really good drama.  Fortunately, it succeeded spectacularly.  Despite a slim (but ideal) running time of just over ninety minutes, Belfast packs in so much, and with remarkable depth.  
The acting is great across the board, from the charming young Hill to desperate yet strong parents Balfe and Dornan, to wise, steady, loving grandparents in Dench and Hinds.  The black-and-white images are beautiful and set the tone in a variety of ways, not just as a signifier of history/memory; and the jazzy soundtrack is unexpected yet wonderful.  But it is the film's amazing ability to hold two seemingly opposing sides of life in equal and complementary, not contradictory, ways that sets Belfast apart as the greatest film of 2020-21.  The despair and danger of social upheaval and violence, plus personal family turmoil on the one hand; yet the joy and innocence of childhood and the strength of family bonds on the other.  This is illustrated by the film's two best scenes: its first, as the Troubles strike suddenly like lightning on a little neighborhood; and one of the last, when the family enjoys a sparkling dance.  This is a must-see movie.

Honorable Mentions:  No Time To Die, The Green Knight


Most Overrated Film of the Year:  The Power of the Dog (runner-up: The Suicide Squad)
Despite the pandemic, there were still a lot of new superhero movies to watch in the last two years.  One of my least favorite, yet one that got among the best critical receptions, was The Suicide Squad.  It's not bad, and has plenty of fun parts.  But Deadpool, by being such an exemplar of the crude, ultra-violent yet funny superhero movie, kind of spoiled the game for everyone else.  The Suicide Squad doesn't really add anything new to this subgenre, and both tries too hard while going generic on the finale.
To me, by far the most overrated film of the year is The Power of the Dog, one of the favorites for Best Picture at the Oscars.  I'll begin by stating that a good part of this may be simple personal taste; I recognize that in terms of filmmaking mechanics, there are well-done elements, particularly Benedict Cumberbatch's acting.  But my overwhelming reaction to the movie was: WTF?  Just unrelentingly dark and dismal, or at least bleak (life on a Montana ranch? No thanks).  The plot, such as it is, is uninteresting and left unexplained in many important ways (to be Mysterious or Artsy?).  The themes, on homosexuality and toxic masculinity, are tiresomely done (and much, much better done in so many other movies), IMO.  It's two hours, but feels more like three.  No, thanks.

Most Underrated Film of the Year:  Downhill (runner-up: Eternals)
I've already described these two in my top 10 films of the year, but I want to emphasize that these two - very different - movies were very underrated.  Something that draws them together is that they are also quite different than what I expected - in Eternals' case, different from other MCU movies, and for Downhill, a different style of humor and level of drama than I expected.  I admit that often when a movie turns out much differently than I expected, it negatively affects how I react to it, so this may be a big reason for the critical (and box office) results.  But I apparently kept an open mind while watching these, and was rewarded for it.  They're both definitely much more worth a try than you might expect.

Most Disappointing Film of the Year:  Wonder Woman 2 (runner-up: N/A)
My disappointment in the Wonder Woman sequel is two-fold: its release and its quality.  Originally to be released in theaters in June 2020, that became impossible, of course, due to the pandemic.  The studio lost patience after moving back its release date several times and decided to just dump it on HBO Max for Christmas 2020.  In contrast, Marvel patiently held Black Widow, originally scheduled for May 2020, and released it in theaters in July 2021.  I wish DC had done the same.
On the other hand, Wonder Woman 2 turned out to be mostly a dud.  Particularly disappointing since the first, in 2017, was so good, the sequel was just bizarre.  The villain and his plot were ridiculous; it might have been funny in a blatant parody movie, but this was not (I think?).  My opinion might be at least a little better if I'd seen it in a theater - where it was meant to be seen - but I'm having trouble remembering much that was great about this movie, except for some Kristen Wiig fun here and there.

Most Surprisingly Good Film of the Year:  The Lovebirds (runner-up: Birds of Prey)
Margot Robbie's Harley Quinn appears in both the most overrated, and the most surprisingly good, movies of the year.  She doesn't really get much to do in The Suicide Squad; an interesting "rebound" with a bad guy boss unfortunately goes off the tracks quickly and into mindless violence.  But she gets quite a bit of interesting character exploration in Birds of Prey, featuring her but also a few other heroines in a cool, feminist superhero film.  Plus, the action is less bloody, more creative, and much more fun in this one.
I saw several "meh" Netflix original films over the last two years (see below), but The Lovebirds was better than just a way to pass the time.  Starring the talented duo of Issa Rae and Kumail Nanjiani, it's a rom-com action film, up to date in both modern relationship dynamics and also, though more subtly, racial context.  It's got a great opening hook, very good writing, and even a nice finale, which this and similar genres usually fail.

Worst Film of the Year:  Army of the Dead; The Power of the Dog
I didn't see any truly bad movies in the last two years, fortunately.  Well, at least, I didn't bother sitting through to the end.  I started to watch Melissa McCarthy's Netflix comedy Thunder Force but stopped; she is often able to lift up otherwise poor films, but not this time.  I did finish Army of the Dead, since it was at least fairly entertaining throughout and held some hope for improvement or at least something interesting (neither of which really happened).  Dave Bautista is fun (if a bit much at times) in a supporting role in Guardians of the Galaxy; as a movie's lead, not so much.
The most unpleasant film I saw, by a pretty wide margin, was, again, The Power of the Dog.  Part of me wants to see it again in case I missed something or was just in the wrong mood.  But it was just so off-putting to me, I don't think I can go through it again.

Other Films I Saw in Theaters in 2020-21

Streaming Movies
  • Don't Look Up! (B+): I did like this movie, and was particularly happy to see a climate change allegory get so much attention (hopefully giving some sort of boost to real-world efforts to combat the greatest crisis of our time).  I think its Best Picture nomination is a stretch, but DiCaprio and Lawrence are fun to watch and writer/director McKay (The Big Short, Vice) is clever.
  • The Mitchells vs. The Machines (B+): This is among the stronger non-Pixar animated films I've seen recently... but still, non-Pixar.  I like the average-family-in-a-robot-apocalypse hijinks, but there are some missed opportunities.  It's well-made and worth it for families and adults alike, but not a must-see.
  • Borat 2 (B): Definitely not for everyone, but you already knew that.  This was a lot better than I was expecting, as some of Cohen's non-Borat movies have been pretty awful.  His co-star Maria Bakalova is excellent, every bit as good as Cohen, and the raunchy humor is smart and funny enough to excuse itself (IMO).
  • 6 Underground (B): Yes, it's directed by Michael Bay; yes, it has a lot of explosions.  But this is a lot better than a Transformers movie.  Ryan Reynolds leads a good cast and there is plenty of good action and humor.  One of the best throwaway streaming "blockbusters" I've seen; I'd watch it again.
  • The Old Guard (B): This one is more ambitious and serious, which both hurt and helped it.  Theron is great in a neat, if not completely original premise of ancient, immortal (rather, constantly reincarnated) warriors.  Not one for the squeamish.
  • Moxie (B-): I honestly don't remember this one too well; I mostly watched it because of Amy Poehler.  It has good intentions and is more creative than the typical coming-of-age movie, but the execution is too often mediocre.
  • Space Jam 2 (C+): I actually did see this in the theater - I saw the original in theaters, too, when I was a 10-year-old Michael Jordan super fan.  It's fun, though LeBron is, probably unsurprisingly, not the most compelling lead.  The technical effects are impressive, and a halftime gag made me laugh out loud.

Well, those were the years 2020 and 2021 for me in theaters and at home with the movies.  I hope you've already seen - or will be inspired to go out and see - some of my recommendations.  Take care until next time!


* https://deadline.com/2022/01/belfast-script-kenneth-branagh-read-the-screenplay-1234918538/

2020-21 On Your Left Film Awards

 


2020-21 On Your Left Film Awards

It's been two years since I last wrote my annual film year-in-review posts.  I am very happy to return to this tradition, and I also look back on the last two crazy, time-warped, tumultuous year and am thankful for the opportunity to do so.  The pandemic changed a lot of things, for the entire world and myself included, but it did not diminish my passion for seeing movies in a theater.  Streaming is good, too - especially when going to the theater is impossible - but it simply cannot replace the cinematic experience.

Here are my Oscar-like awards for both 2020 and 2021 movies.  I'm keeping the same "rules" that I had in 2019 and earlier:

  1. Only films released widely in 2020 and 2021 are eligible (this is getting murkier each year, so another way to put it: whichever year it came out in my theater - or streaming only - is the year I'm sticking it, so certain films often have to "wait" a year), and 
  2. Only films that I've actually seen are eligible.
I'll note the nominees in the Oscar-equivalent categories, for comparison.  Please check out my other annual movie post, which includes my top 10 of the year and other miscellaneous awards (over/underrated, etc.)!

Winners in bold
Runners-up underlined


Best Actress
Caitriona Balfe (Belfast)
Olivia Colman (The Lost Daughter)
Rebecca Ferguson (Dune)
Julia Louis-Dreyfus (Downhill)
Margot Robbie (Birds of Prey)

Oscar nominees not listed: Jessica Chastain (The Eyes of Tammy Faye), Penelope Cruz (Parallel Mothers), Nicole Kidman (Being the Ricardos), Kristen Stewart (Spencer) - didn't see films

Quite an array of movie genres are represented by these actresses, who all did exceptional work, in very different styles.  I'd give an honorable mention, too, to Cristin Milioti, starring in the sci-fi comedy Palm Springs with Andy Samberg.  Margot Robbie has played the role of the psychopath anti-heroine Harley Quinn in two different movies in this span, with Birds of Prey being both the superior film and showcase for Robbie.  She somehow seems to fully inhabit Harley's deranged mind, one of the most entertaining characters in the crowded genre.  Caitriona Balfe is probably the unsung MVP of Belfast, a strong and loving woman holding her family together in the midst of social and personal strife; Balfe plays her both raw and under control, capable and also vulnerable.  Rebecca Ferguson's Lady Jessica is similarly at the center of the story of Dune, and she expresses herself remarkably well, mostly through body language, in a stoic role.

Julia Louis-Dreyfus got a great role in Downhill, one of the most underrated films, let alone comedies, in years.  It feels so real - partly from the writing, but at least as much from her performance - shifting from driest hilarity to squirm-in-your seat tense and awkward.  Colman, who has impressed in period pieces like The Favourite and The Crown, shows that she is just as skilled in a modern, ordinary role in The Lost Daughter.  She gets to do a little of everything, from the silent to the showy, sympathetic but sometimes repugnant.  Both of these actresses bring greatness to their films.


Best Actor
Benedict Cumberbatch (The Power of the Dog)
Leonardo DiCaprio (Don't Look Up)
Jamie Dornan (Belfast)
Will Ferrell (Downhill)
Dev Patel (The Green Knight)

Oscar nominees not listed: Javier Bardem (Being the Ricardos), Andrew Garfield (Tick, Tick... Boom!), Will Smith (King Richard), Denzel Washington (The Tragedy of Macbeth) - didn't see the films

Honestly, it was a bit of a down year in this category; good performances, but nothing truly great.  I give Tom Holland an honorable nod for his third Spider-Man movie; he seems almost custom-made for the role but he also clearly gives it his best, and his heart, throughout.  As he did previously in Stranger than Fiction, Ferrell proved again that he has true dramatic acting chops in Downhill - though he's still funny, too, of course.  DiCaprio has been great in just about everything I've seen him in in the last ten years; this is a good, fun one (especially the accent), but the movie around him is just not as good.  Dev Patel is in almost all of The Green Knight - but he's not even the title character! - and does a good enough job being realistically bamboozled by the odd events to allow the audience to suspend its disbelief.

Benedict Cumberbatch shows great intensity in The Power of the Dog - but it's much different from the kind of intellectual, anti-social kind from The Imitation Game and Sherlock.  It's too bad the movie itself is a confusing, pointless load of hooey, but his character commands attention from beginning to end.  I'm sorry, Jamie Dornan, your performance isn't the stuff of great winners I've seen in years past.  But it's still very good, a restrained role that still provides much of the tension - in plot and emotion - in Belfast.  Fortunately, he gets to let loose in a final, out-of-nowhere sing-and-dance number that is truly joyful.


Best Supporting Actress
Jessie Buckley (The Lost Daughter)
Ariana DeBose (West Side Story)
Judi Dench (Belfast)
Maria Bakalova (Borat 2)
Florence Pugh (Black Widow)

Oscar nominees not listed: Kirsten Dunst (The Power of the Dog) - eligible but chose not to nominate; Aunjanue Ellis (King Richard) - didn't see the film

Like their lead counterparts, the supporting female actors this year produced fantastic performances.  I give an honorable mention to Jennifer Lawrence, who I hadn't seen for quite some time, going toe-to-toe with DiCaprio in Don't Look Up.  Borat 2 rises to the level of a good comedy on the strength of Maria Bakalova's performance, a "relative" of Borat's who is just as outrageous but even better at needling our society's shortcomings.  Judi Dench is a great presence in Belfast, even as she also fits into her modest matriarch role.  And Florence Pugh continues on a tear since I first saw her in theaters; now she's also part of Hollywood's biggest family, the Marvel Cinematic Universe.  She is great as both a hardened assassin and awkward yet loving sister in Black Widow.

Jessie Buckley more than held up her end of the bargain as the younger version of Colman's Leda in The Lost Daughter.  She has the advantage of many more passionate moments, from parental frustration to hidden lust, but she still connects all the dots to the primary, older version.  Ariana DeBose is the virtuoso performer of the year, serving as the best part of the West Side Story remake.  She has personality and character nuance to spare, with some of the movie's most powerful moments - and to top it off, she is also the most sensational performer, knocking my socks off with "America".


Best Supporting Actor
Dean-Charles Chapman (1917)
Sacha Baron Cohen (The Trial of the Chicago 7)
Mike Faist (West Side Story)
Ciaran Hinds (Belfast)
Tony Leung (Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings)

Oscar nominees not listed: Troy Kotsur (CODA), J.K. Simmons (Being the Ricardos) - didn't see the films; Jesse Plemons (The Power of the Dog), Kodi Smit-McPhee (The Power of the Dog) - eligible but chose not to nominate

There is quite a variety of performances among the best of the supporting actors in 2020 and 2021.  Dean-Charles Chapman brought much-needed humanity, and even humor, to the intimate war epic 1917.  Ciaran Hinds was a perfect partner for Judi Dench in Belfast, as Buddy's wise and gentle grandfather.  Tony Leung was both one of the better parts of Shang-Chi and among Marvel's best villains to date; both charismatic and menacing, he was easily the biggest presence on the screen.

Mike Faist, while not as overtly brilliant as his co-star Ariana DeBose, brought an important emotional intensity to West Side Story.  While the love story failed to produce as many sparks as it should, Faist ensured that the Sharks vs. Jets confrontations were tense and also tragic.  Sacha Baron Cohen, as Abby Elliott, rose above them all in The Trial of the Chicago 7.  Best known as the silly, over-the-top (and vulgar) Borat, Cohen displayed very impressive control and nuance, a strong accent and body language.  And he was, of course, hilarious.  The film boasts easily the most fun ensemble of 2020-21 - from Mark Rylance and Jeremy Piven to Joseph Gordon-Levitt and many others - but Cohen stands out among them.


Best Director
Kenneth Branaugh (Belfast)
Nat Faxon and Jim Rash (Downhill)
Maggie Gyllenhaal (The Lost Daughter)
Denis Villeneuve (Dune)
Jon Watts (Spider-Man: No Way Home)

Oscar nominees not listed: Ryusuke Hamaguchi (Drive My Car) - didn't see the film; Jane Campion (The Power of the Dog), Steven Spielberg (West Side Story) - eligible but chose not to nominate; Paul Thomas Anderson (Licorice Pizza) - not eligible, released in 2022 (in my theater)

I don't know the filmmaking process, well, pretty much at all, so I judge the best directing to be a combination of the highest overall quality of the movie with the degree of difficulty - difficulty as it seems to me, at least.  Nat Faxon and Jim Rash would seem to have an easy job, making a comedy with Will Ferrell and Julia Louis-Dreyfus.  However, the humor was, for the most part, among the driest I've seen; and though it was indeed funny, it leaned more on its dramatic side, and successfully.  Maggie Gyllenhaal, a first-time director, gave her very plot-light film great tension and anticipation by focusing laserlike on its main character; the realism of all the little details gives the powerful dramatic components that much more weight.  Dune is very un-realistic, in a sense, taking place in a far-in-the-future sci-fi universe.  But Villeneuve succeeds most, in my opinion, in building that world, from the deserts to the cold technology, into a fully immersive experience.

This is not the first time - and hopefully won't be the last time - that I've give praise to a Marvel superhero movie director.  Similar to the Avengers films, in particular, this Spider-Man sequel, directed again by Jon Watts, has the high degree of difficulty challenge of handling a large cast; this one even more so, actually.  Kenneth Branagh did the best work of all this year, in a film that is semi-autobiographical.  He may have indulged in details of his own childhood but if so, they only serve to heighten the connection we feel to the main characters, young Buddy and his family.  There is plenty of turmoil, from both the Troubles and the family's domestic concerns, but it's not a heavy film.  What shines through is the innocence of childhood and the will to keep going even in the most difficult of days.  Everything is well balanced and executed, and I choose to give Branagh the lion's share of credit for that.


Best Screenplay
Jesse Armstrong, Nat Faxon, Jim Rash (Downhill)
Kenneth Branagh (Belfast)
Maggie Gyllenhaal (The Lost Daughter)
Andy Siara (Palm Springs)
Aaron Sorkin (The Trial of the Chicago 7)

Best Visual Effects
Dune
Eternals
Godzilla vs. King Kong
Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings
Spider-Man: No Way Home


* https://www.britannica.com/story/who-votes-for-the-academy-awards