Saturday, March 11, 2023

2022 "On Your Left" Film Year-in-Review

 

2022 "On Your Left" Film Year-in-Review

It's that time again - celebrating a year's worth of movies!  The cinematic schedule was pretty much back to pre-pandemic patterns in 2022, although the number of movies released was still way down, along with the overall box office.  But there were still plenty of fun movies to go see.  Granted, it was more tilted than ever toward action and fantasy movies, as well as other big draws (horror, family movies, etc.).  I was also disappointed to see more and more movies released streaming only - like the Knives Out sequel and The Gray Man blockbuster - that should have gone to theaters.  Hopefully, a virtuous cycle of Hollywood releasing higher-quality and more varied movies in theaters with audiences increasingly getting their butts off the couch and into those theaters will pick up steam in 2023.

Here is the format of this post, same as in years past:
  • Top 10 films of the year!
  • Most underrated/overrated films
  • Most surprising/disappointing films
  • Worst film of the year
  • List of other films I saw in theaters (with links to my reviews)
  • Films I saw on streaming
Please check out my companion post here, which is more like my Oscar-style awards.  I hope you'll check out some of these movies for yourself!


Top 10 Films of 2022

10. The Fabelmans (Directed by Steven Spielberg; starring Gabriel LaBelle, Michelle Williams, Paul Dano)

One of the few straightforward dramas I saw in theaters last year, The Fabelmans is quite a departure for the legendary Spielberg.  Joining the trend of filmmakers dipping into their personal lives for the themes - and even characters and plots - of their movies, there are no scary beasts, whip-cracking adventurers, or soaring John Williams themes.  Instead we get a pretty normal family, featuring a son growing up and into filmmaking, and his parents' tumultuous relationship.  Spielberg does well with this more standard dramatic material but it's sadder, and at times harsher, than you'd expect from the living legend.  There's no way this one will stick with me like most of his filmography, but it's a quality film.

9. Everything Everywhere All At Once (Directed by Dan Kwan & Daniel Scheinert; starring Michelle Yeoh, Stephanie Hsu, Ke Huy Quan)

As its title suggests, Everything Everywhere All At Once is the most off-the-wall movie of the year.  It is so many things at once, in fact, that it's hard to define it succinctly, except that by the end, you feel like you've just woken from a dream.  Michelle Yeoh, of Crouching Tiger... fame, is in her wheelhouse with the stellar martial arts choreography, though her laundromat owning-character takes some time to adjust to it.  The timing of the multiverse plot, considering its heavy use in Marvel films and others recently, dampens the appeal of that aspect.  But the family dynamics, particularly with wayward, funky daughter Joy (Hsu) make up for it.  See it once for a unique movie experience - and maybe again!

8. The Menu (Directed by Mark Mylod; starring Anya Taylor-Joy, Ralph Fiennes, Nicholas Hoult)

Despite my aversion to horror movies, I almost went to see this in the theater, thanks to good actors and an interesting premise.  Shame on me for not going.  In some ways it's a pretty typical horror setup: a young couple takes off on a fun getaway, only to slowly realize that there are more sadistic plans at hand.  As someone who rolls his eyes at foodies, though, this is a brilliant parody of that culture, and particularly the obscenely rich ones who take it up for the sole purpose of lording it over others.  Taylor-Joy is a cunning, sympathetic audience surrogate, Fiennes is an obsessed villain who is strikingly complex, and Holt is a hoot.  I'll still pass on most horror movies... but I'm definitely up for more like this one.

7. Thor: Love and Thunder (Directed by Taika Waititi; starring Chris Hemsworth, Natalie Portman, Christian Bale)

Debuting in 2011 as a fairly typical fantasy character, Thor has changed significantly over the years, now on his fourth solo film.  It was filmmaker Taika Waititi who led the evolution, in 2017's Ragnarok, injecting his eccentric sense of humor into the character.  Waititi returns for Love and Thunder which, while not quite as good, is still among the better Marvel movies (a big compliment from me) and has Thor's most poignant moments yet.  We get plenty of humor here, from an awkward separation from the Guardians to a daintily-toga'd Russell Crowe, even if it's just short of too silly.  But we also get great stakes and impact, from new villain Gorr (Bale) to old squeeze Jane (Portman).  Underrated!

6. Violent Night (Directed by Tommy Wirkola; starring David Harbour, John Leguizamo, Leah Brady)

You'll never hear Santa say "ho, ho, ho!" quite the same way after seeing this one.  I rarely see Christmas movies in the theater, but 2022 had not just one but two holidays standouts.  Throw Home Alone, Die Hard, and John Wick in a blender, and this is what you get.  If Santa had been miscast, this could have been a rough watch, but David Harbour is perfect in the role, both grizzled and tough as well as possessing St. Nick's good cheer (down deep, at least).  Seeing Santa in hand-to-hand combat with a baddie for the first time is so ludicrous that you can't help but laugh, and the Big Guy "levels up" to some pretty bad ass mayhem by the end.  Not for everyone, clearly, but it somehow just gets most things right.

5. The Banshees of Inisherin (Directed by Martin McDonagh; starring Colin Farrell, Brendan Gleeson, Kerry Condon)

This black dramedy is my favorite "traditional"* Best Picture nominee this year.  While I haven't seen the trio's first film together, In Bruges, Banshees makes me glad that director McDonagh reunited with Farrell and Gleeson.  Little of any consequence really happens here, and that either results in a tortuously-long viewing experience or allows other elements to shine - the latter occurs here.  There's no intro, we simply find that a simple man (Farrell) has been cut off by his long-time best friend (Gleeson) for no apparent reason.  Looks cruel and dull on paper, but the script and, especially, performances are so great that it is actually both hilarious and very affecting.  The relationship's turmoil turns darker as it goes - which I was a little disappointed with - but it's always, somehow, gripping.  Watch for Condon's brilliant Siobhan, too.

4. Amsterdam (Directed by David O. Russell; starring Christian Bale, John David Washington, Margot Robbie)

Just edging out Banshees for my favorite drama of the year is Amsterdam, the latest from acclaimed director Russell (Silver Linings Playbook, American Hustle, etc.).  Critics panned it (just 32% on RT) and while I see hints of why, I just plain disagree.  I'll admit the script can be a little shaky, at times a little too straightforward or simply awkward.  But the trio of characters at its core has great chemistry in a unique, touching, and fun relationship.  Christian Bale leads the way, doggedly caring for his fellow veterans yet not stuffily righteous; cranky, but in a lovable way.  Don't worry about following all the details of the wild plot - the movie has its heart in the right place, and in my view does a great job honoring veterans.  A lovely, memorable flute theme is a finishing touch for a really good movie.

3. Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (Directed by Sam Raimi; starring Benedict Cumberbatch, Elizabeth Olsen, Rachel McAdams)

Doctor Strange 2 turned out even better than its superhero sibling Thor, making for a great summer 2022 for Marvel.  In the tradition of Marvel's best movies, it somehow combines a number of different objectives - in plot, character, and overall narrative arc - in a tidy, cohesive, and thoroughly entertaining package.  Viewers of the standout WandaVision series are treated to a great follow-up storyline for her here, sharing the spotlight with the title character.  Wanda is now one of the best, and perhaps most tragic, of Marvel's superheroes.  The multiverse idea, exploding onto Marvel's path in Spider-Man 3 just months prior, is further developed in Doctor Strange's particular, mystical style.  It is a visual feast, filled with fun,  creative action, and a dose of horror (a Raimi specialty) sprinkled in appropriately.

2. Spirited (Directed by Sean Anders; starring Will Ferrell, Ryan Gosling, Octavia Spencer)

A movie I thought was streaming-only, I was pleasantly surprised when it came to my local theater.  A long-time Will Ferrell fan, I was eager to see if he could return to his glory days.  Well, this is a slightly different Ferrell than of old, but just as good, with a great assist from unexpected yet perfect partner Ryan Reynolds.  Spirited is essentially a modern retelling of A Christmas Carol; while that structure can lead to disastrous results, I thought the story was cleverly written and just as well executed.  I also thought I'd have to just tolerate the musical numbers, but they were great: well-performed, easy to follow (I can't make out what they're singing in many other musicals!), and just the right balance.  With Ferrell and Reynolds, it's really funny, of course, but the film's theme is genuinely warm, not cloying or cliched.  Surprising as it sounds, Ferrell now has two classic holidays movies!

1. Top Gun: Maverick (Directed by Joseph Kosinski; starring Tom Cruise, Miles Teller, Jennifer Connelly)

Although I've admired Tom Cruise's dedication in acting, particularly in recent Mission: Impossible movies, I thought that this sequel (thirty-six years after the original) would just be a harmless, disposable bit of summer fun.  Actually, it kind of is just that.  But it's also a stunning example of why there is simply no substitute for the movie theater.  The aerial scenes - from standard aircraft take-offs to intense dogfights - are just remarkable.  Like any good action movie, it ramps up the spectacle throughout.  The difference is that I thought, before the climax began, that they had already reached maximum velocity.  Um, nope.  The real-life stunt effects work pays off brilliantly, providing a visceral experience unlike any other, from both inside and outside the cockpit.  Maverick also holds its own back on the ground, though.  Cruise is, of course, the main reason why.  He exudes star power, yet his character is also fairly reserved, with some self-effacing humor, and is easy to root for.  Add in some solid co-stars and an authentically vintage style, and it's hard to remember whether you're in 1986 or 2022.  So Top Gun 2 won't win any dramatic awards.  But it is one of the very best blockbusters of the century.



Most Underrated Film of the Year: Amsterdam (runner up: Marvel movies-sort of)
I seemed to be on generally the same page as critics this year; almost all my top-ranked movies received at least overall favorable ratings.  This is probably just the Marvel fan in me, but I do note a growing disrespect, or at least indifferent attitude toward these films.  Yes, a lot of them have been made over the last fifteen years.  But they are almost all still high-quality, very entertaining movies, even if you haven't kept up with the others.
Amsterdam was the only glaring exception to my alignment with critics in 2022.  Browsing some of the headlines, it seems most found the plot too much and/or the tone too inconsistent.  I agree that there's a lot of plot, but I found it pretty easy to follow, and most of the details are inessential, anyway.  I also thought the balance of tones was pulled off really well.  To each their own, but I highly advise giving this a try. (available to stream on HBO Max!)

Most Overrated Film of the Year: Licorice Pizza (runner up: Devotion)
The premise of Devotion is very intriguing, particularly the two biggest (long-overlooked) historical elements in the desegregation of the armed forces and the Korean War.  But this movie completely wastes that potential, barely addressing the history.  What's more, the script is terrible, cliche and boring.  I would just keep rewatching Top Gun: Maverick before ever rewatching this one.
Licorice Pizza is technically a 2021 film, but it's the last of the movies that I'm categorizing in the year it was actually released in my theater.  It's astounding to me that this film was nominated for Best Picture, Director, and Original Screenplay at the Oscars, with a 91% on RT.  Once again, we start with a good premise, but the rest is a chaotic jumble of barely connected diversions which range from inexplicable and dull to gross (with the exception of one funny scene trying to escape in a van that's run out of gas).  Pass.

Most Surprisingly Good Film of the Year: Spirited (runner up: Violent Night)
I have to give this category to the holiday movie duo for 2022.  Violent Night is somehow both wild and yet also relatively restrained and sneakily consistent in its quality.  This is the anti-Christmas stereotype movie, with plenty of cynical, darker humor and a whole heap of smackdown; yet it still has the gall (and skill) to keep a cheery spirit!  That's what I call a Christmas miracle.
But the winner here has to be Spirited, and not just because it is my #2 movie of the year.  As soon as I learned that this starred both Will Ferrell and Ryan Reynolds, I knew I had to see it.  To be honest, though, I was very prepared for it to be a disaster, or at least, a boringly inoffensive throwaway that would barely register as a footnote in the two stars' filmographies.  Yet the take on A Christmas Carol is actually quite fresh and interesting; the musical numbers are inspired; and the comedic writing is high quality.  And you know that Ferrell and Reynolds bring it home.  I will definitely come back to this one in years to come.

Most Disappointing Film of the Year: Jurassic World Dominion (runner up: Glass Onion: A Knives Out Story)
Glass Onion is almost a perfect parallel to 2020/21's most disappointing movie, Wonder Woman 2.  Both are sequels to tremendous original movies, and they both fail largely by trying to go too big and almost completely abandoning the smaller charms that made the originals so successful.  Importantly, they were both also streaming-only releases (Wonder Woman 2 had the good excuse of the pandemic - but they could have just waited, like Bond did!) for movies that obviously should have gone to movie theaters.  The small screen just makes their flaws all the more glaring.
But Jurassic World Dominion is by far my biggest disappointment in 2022.  Jurassic Park is still my all-time favorite movie, and I didn't imagine Dominion would come anywhere close to it.  However, this is the worst of the six Jurassic movies.  The reunion of Alan Grant, Ellie Sattler, and Ian Malcolm (while each have a few good moments) shows just how creatively bankrupt the series had become.  2015's Jurassic World, while a much more fantasy-styled movie than the original, was at least well-made and fresh.  Dominion takes all the weaknesses of that style and blows them up to awful proportions; from ridiculous dino action scenes and bad CGI to quarter-hearted attempts at characters.  Ugh.

Worst Film of the Year: Black Adam
DC continues to be the superhero little brother to Marvel; the Dreamworks to Marvel's Pixar; the Pepsi to Marvel's Coca-Cola; the PC to Marvel's Mac; the Rolling Stones to Marvel's The Beatles; the... OK, I'll stop.  Black Adam is a perfect example of DC's hapless efforts to make superhero movies like Marvel - although even for DC, this is particularly bad.  There's just little that's positive to say about it; I guess it could serve as a nice distraction for young kids when you need it (although there are better options for that situation).  Dwayne Johnson has some acting talent, I'll admit it.  But he is still pretty dependent on good writing and directing to point him in the right direction.  When you just let his ego take off and don't give him any help, it's painful to watch.  The ending sets up a sequel - which I will not be watching.


Streaming Movies:
  • The Menu (A-):  This made my top-10 of the year, so I'm kicking myself for not going to see it in the theater.
  • Hustle (B+):  Adam Sandler put in another impressive dramatic acting performance, following Uncut Gems (an unpleasant film, but good acting).  It doesn't escape all the sports movie tropes, but this is definitely among the better ones, focusing on the behind-the-scenes effort to get an international star into the NBA.  Bonus points for NBA fans, with lots of cameos.
  • Elvis (B):  It's ridiculous that this got nominated for Best Picture; more so than Queen biopic Bohemian Rhapsody which was also a stretch.  Austin Butler does a nice Elvis impersonation, and it's entertaining.  But it's also LONG (like too many movies these days) and meandering, with much less effective character development than it thinks it has.
  • DC League of Super Pets (B):  A very kid-friendly animated superhero adventure that's also perfectly passable for adults.  Johnson and Hart continue to be a good comedic duo and Kate McKinnon is great as the villainous super-guinea pig.  It's also pretty forgettable, though.
  • Glass Onion: A Knives Out Story (B):  Although it's my disappointment of the year runner-up, Glass Onion isn't bad.  It is inventive and entertaining, but just too far out there and not as tightly made.  Daniel Craig's Benoit Blanc (aka "CSI: KFC") is also much less interesting this time.  Let's hope he's back to form with some better writing next time, and it's not just because the surprise factor is gone.
  • The Man From Toronto (B):  I'll be honest, I really don't remember this movie very well, but it was perfectly fun.  Hart and Harrelson made a good comedic combo.  If you need something purely entertaining for a night at home, this is a good choice.
  • Bullet Train (B-):  I considered seeing this in theaters, but the premise just seemed too derivative of other movies I've seen, plus I'm tired of Brad Pitt.  After seeing it at home by streaming, I'm glad I waited.  It's entertaining, sure, and digs into characters, or at least tries to, more than the action-packed trailers make it seem.  But the ending just goes entirely off the tracks, and there's little that distinguishes it from similar movies.

Other movies I saw in theaters in 2022:
I hope that you were able to watch and enjoy some of these movies in theaters last year.  And maybe I've convinced you to try some others at home (and to avoid others)!  Looking forward to more fun and moving experiences at the cinema in 2023.



2022 "On Your Left" Film Awards


2022 "On Your Left" Film Awards

Last year was back to normal, for the most part, at the movie theater.  Summer is still the time for blockbusters, and early fall is a dead zone.  Awards contenders did seem to be harder to find at the theater, though.  I saw just four of the ten Best Picture nominees in the theater.  And while I certainly enjoy action, comedy, and other "crowdpleasers", it is a bit distressing to see how few regular dramas - let alone awards contenders - did well at the box office.  Of the top 50 movies, at most ten were dramas (to be very charitable), or as few as five.  Hopefully the variety of movie genres will improve in 2023.  Still, there were some very good acting performances to acknowledge.

For my own Oscar-style awards, I'm sticking with my rule that only films I've seen are eligible.  However, I'm going to try to line up my calendar-based eligibility to match the Oscars (I used to count a movie as released in whichever year I saw them - I often only got to see awards contenders in the following year).

Please also check out my year-in-review post with my top-10 movies of the year, most overrated and most surprising movies, and more, too!

Winners in bold
Runners-up underlined


Best Actor
Christian Bale (Amsterdam)
Tom Cruise (Top Gun: Maverick)
Colin Farrell (The Banshees of Inisherin)
David Harbour (Violent Night)
Daniel Kaluuya (Nope)

Disagree/Honorable mention: Austin Butler (Elvis)
Didn't see: Brendan Fraser (The Whale), Paul Mescal (Aftersun), Bill Nighy (Living)

David Harbour was a perfect choice as a grizzled Santa, darkly funny yet also surprisingly warm.  Daniel Kaluuya was interesting in a stoic, quiet role in Nope, contrasting with the craziness happening around him.  Tom Cruise is still a megastar, giving it everything he's got; the flight scenes, much of which he did himself, were just insane.  Christian Bale, my favorite contemporary actor, was great in an eccentric, bedraggled role with a lot of heart.  But Colin Farrell gave the best performance of the year, a seemingly simple and sweet villager betrayed by his best friend.  Farrell gives him great depth, though, carrying the film in both everyday exchanges and silent but telling body language.

Best Actress
Alana Haim (Licorice Pizza)
Anya Taylor-Joy (The Menu)
Michelle Williams (The Fabelmans)
Letitia Wright (Black Panther: Wakanda Forever)
Michelle Yeoh (Everything Everywhere All At Once)

Honorable mention: Margot Robbie (Amsterdam)
Didn't see: Cate Blanchett (Tar), Ana de Armas (Blonde), Andrea Riseborough (To Leslie)

Alana Haim (in Licorice Pizza, a final 2021 carry-over) was intriguing as a young woman searching for her place yet tossed about by a variety of wild characters.  Anya Taylor-Joy is a great audience surrogate in the horror The Menu, but also a wise, strong character to root for.  Letitia Wright had the impossible task of stepping into Chadwick Boseman's shoes, but she takes the superhero in her own firm direction.  Michelle Yeoh is phenomenal as always in her choreography but her personal scenes are just as moving.  But Michelle Williams was the best in 2022, a mother, wife, and artist whose strengths and frailties both are the most raw, powerful parts of the movie.  There is so much truth in her vivid portrait.

Best Supporting Actress
Angela Bassett (Black Panther: Wakanda Forever)
Kerry Condon (The Banshees of Inisherin)
Stephanie Hsu (Everything Everywhere All At Once)
Zoe Kravitz (The Batman)
Elizabeth Olsen (Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness)

Honorable mention: Emma Mackey (Death on the Nile)
Didn't see: Hong Chau (The Whale)
Disagree: Jamie Lee Curtis (Everything Everywhere All At Once)

Superhero movies featured a bevy of great performances.  Zoe Kravitz offers a fresh new take on Selina Kyle, aka Catwoman - yet, just like her predecessors, every bit the match of Batman.  Angela Bassett is a commanding presence, trying to hold Wakanda together despite strife, and her familial connections helping the next generation rise up.  Elizabeth Olsen is given a great epilogue role as follow-up to the excellent WandaVision and she takes full advantage, joining Iron Man and company in the superhero pantheon.  Stephanie Hsu plays so many parts in one, the epitome of the multiversal Everything Everywhere... and has the most fun of anyone.  But it's Kerry Condon who shines above the rest as a protective yet independent woman in Banshees of Inisherin (and a librarian, no less!).  Her intense gaze can be withering or warm; her patience with her brother endless but her put-downs of those who earn them lightning-quick.

Best Supporting Actor
Christian Bale (Thor: Love and Thunder)
Brendan Gleeson (The Banshees of Inisherin)
Nicholas Hoult (The Menu)
Harry Melling (The Pale Blue Eye)
Ke Huy Quan (Everything Everywhere All At Once)

Didn't see: Brian Tyree Henry (Causeway)
Disagree: Judd Hirsch (The Fabelmans), Barry Keoghan (The Banshees of Inisherin)

Ke Huy Quan, last seen as Short Round in Indiana Jones, is a sweetly devoted husband in Everything Everywhere.  Nichoulas Holt is deliciously revolting in The Menu, such a pretentious foodie you're dying to see his fate.  Christian Bale shows up again, here as one of Marvel's stronger villains, both menacing but also carrying a poignant backstory.  Brendan Gleeson's gruff tavern fiddler is a perfect foil for Farrell in Banshees, his dark but believable ways packing a punch.  But it's Harry Potter alum (Dudley Dursley) Harry Melling who rises above the rest with a memorable take on Edgar Allen Poe.  His vocal work and physicality stands out, but the way he both hides and reveals things is just as good.

Best Director
Sean Anders (Spirited)
Martin McDonagh (The Banshees of Inisherin)
Sam Raimi (Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness)
David O. Russell (Amsterdam)

Didn't see: Todd Field (Tar), Ruben Ostlund (Triangle of Sadness)
Disagree: Steven Spielberg (The Fabelmans), Daniel Kwan & Daniel Scheinert (Everything Everywhere)

I'm not sure how they do it at the Oscars, but I try to rate directors based on the success of the movie in comparison to the degree of (perceived) difficulty and how well it maximizes its potential.  Banshees, which McDonagh wrote, too, doesn't have much of a plot or innate excitement, but he smartly allows the brilliant performers to bring it to life and paces the tensions of the film masterfully.  David O. Russell's Amsterdam is almost the opposite, (loosely) basing his kooky story on a real event; the script is not the best but Russell and his performers manage an impressive comedic-dramatic balancing act.  Sam Raimi is no stranger to superhero movies, and he brings to Doctor Strange 2 the emotional investment of his Spider-Man movies, not to mention fun doses of both horror and trippiness.  But Sean Anders does the best work in 2022, enmeshing his stars' contrasting styles with a modern take on A Christmas Carol with all-new songs - talk about degree of difficulty, but he pulls it off!

Best Screenplay
Sean Anders & John Morris (Spirited)
Rian Johnson (Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery)
Daniel Kwan & Daniel Scheinert (Everything Everywhere)
Taylor Materne & Will Fetters (Hustle)
Martin McDonagh (The Banshees of Inisherin)

Best Visual/Practical Effects
Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness
Everything Everywhere All At Once
Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore
Top Gun Maverick

Saturday, February 25, 2023

Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

 

Score: C

Directed by Peyton Reed
Starring Paul Rudd, Evangeline Lilly, Michelle Pfeiffer, Jonathan Majors, Kathryn Newton
Running time: 124 minutes
Rated PG-13

Long Story Short:  The most diminutive Marvel hero continues his adventures in Quantumania, alongside partner Hope, aka the Wasp, and company.  Ant-Man movies are usually the "detours" from the main Marvel narrative, but this one is intended as a major plot centerpiece, unfortunately.  The sci-fi blockbuster style here is 180 degrees from what we've seen before, and hope for.  There's still some fun to be had here, but by Marvel standards it's a significant failure.


Having helped the Avengers save Earth from destruction, Scott Lang (Rudd), aka Ant-Man, is taking full advantage of his celebrity, from writing a best-selling memoir to happily greeting a grateful public.  Not everyone in his family is as satisfied, however, particularly his daughter, Cassie (Newton).  The Quantum Realm - where Janet van Dyne (Pfeiffer) was once lost but where the Avengers also found the key to defeating Thanos - still holds many secrets, and Cassie has been determined to explore them.  Soon the entire family finds itself back in that strange dimension, though, and Janet's past returns to menace them.

Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania, the third Ant-Man film, is entertaining but among Marvel's weakest films, due to its trading the series' signature charm for a more generic blockbuster feel.  Ant-Man 1 and 2 focused on ex-con Scott's exploits in trying to rebuild his life, both helped and hindered by friends and family, as the superhero life interferes on (an appropriately) small scale.  The third film, however, fully dives into the sci-fi-heavy Quantum Realm that exists only on the periphery of the other films, showing a world that is at once overstuffed with creatures and cities but also disappointingly familiar.  The QR, and its "society", is essentially a mash up of Star Wars and Marvel's own Guardians of the Galaxy, complete with goofy-looking aliens and a rebellion.  Therefore, aside from a few minutes on Earth at the beginning, the style of the first Ant-Man movies is entirely replaced by that of those bigger, better-known sci-fi entities - and Quantumania is significantly worse off for it.  In addition to losing Ant-Man's con-artist, not-so-heroic zest and replacing it with broad, overly familiar sci-fi setting and plot, the script is also quite a bit weaker than Marvel's standards and not nearly as funny as it should be (at least, not for adults).

Perhaps the biggest factor in the success of the first Ant-Man movies was Scott's relationships, both old and new, but, while there are some character highlights here, they, too, suffer from blockbuster bloat.  The dynamics among them, each interesting as individuals, are dulled to stereotype thanks to overreliance on plot. Cassie, Scott's daughter, has been in the previous films in very small but very cute and effective roles.  There was so much potential here, now that she is a young adult, to show how a variety of influences - both good and bad - have shaped her.  But she is mostly a generic, strong, but still learning heir to the superheroes; I certainly welcome more strong female roles, I just wish the filmmakers gave her a unique and creative personality.  Scott and Janet get the other main roles; each gets enticing themes - for Scott, what his purpose is now that he's saved the world, for Janet, how she balances protecting yet being open with her family - but too much of their screentime is pulled into action and/or plot mechanics.  There are also two surprising cameos - one old face, entirely unnecessary and increasing the sci-fi ridiculousness, the other one new and much more welcome and hilarious.  Kang - introduced in the Loki streaming series, which it helps to have seen but not essential - is pretty interesting in his first scenes with Janet, but then turns into yet another generic villain, a surprisingly ineffective one at that.

There is plenty of action, which at least keeps the pace moving well (and at just over two hours, mercifully shorter than the gargantuan running times of other recent films).  But, once again, it suffers from the shift to sci-fi blockbuster.  There are a few neat ant-themed parts, especially a semi-psychedelic one in which an army of Ant-Man clones works together like an ant colony.  For the most part, though, the clever, subtle, sneaking action of the first Ant-Man movies is replaced by overdone big sci-fi laser battles.  There is, of course, a huge climactic battle.  But it almost pulls it off at the very end, when Ant-Man and Kang finally get a more visceral face-off, and we almost get a shocking conclusion that could have had intriguing carry-over into future Marvel films.  Instead, we get the clean, disappointing ending.  Sigh.

***

Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania is a little distressing to me as a big Marvel movie fan.  It's certainly disappointing that, by itself, it's just not nearly as good as its predecessors, especially because it completely abandoned their charming style.  But there is also the direction of the Marvel "universe" overall.  The multiverse theme has developed in a fairly meandering way until now.  Now that we seem to have a major new villain, essentially the new Thanos, the results are so far underwhelming.  I'd also like Marvel to stop the creep of Guardians of the Galaxy style into more and more of its films.  With, of course, a new Guardians movie coming later this year along with The Marvels, I'm very interested, though with unusual trepidation, to see where Marvel goes from here.  With two C-grade movies to start the year, I look forward to anything good, no matter the genre!




* By http://www.impawards.com/2023/antman_and_the_wasp_quantumania_ver4.html, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=72090715

Saturday, February 11, 2023

Knock at the Cabin

 

Score:  C-

Directed by M. Night Shyamalan
Starring Dave Bautista, Jonathan Groff, Ben Aldridge
Running time: 100 minutes
Rated R

Long Story Short:  Resurgent director M. Night Shyamalan's latest horror outing offers a twist on the old home invasion plot.  It features some nice roles, including an oddly but well-cast Dave Bautista, and the premise is quite intriguing.  But it goes exactly the wrong direction with the plot, for both creative and real-world considerations, and the film curdles with it.  Skip it.


A young family, dads Andrew (Aldridge) and Eric (Groff) and adopted daughter, Wen (Cui), take a vacation to a remote cabin in the woods, merrily singing and catching grasshoppers.  Literally out of the blue, however, an enormous but seemingly peaceful man named Leonard (Bautista) introduces himself to Wen while she plays near the cabin.  Growing more frightened, Wen runs back to alert Andrew and Eric, but soon the family is taken hostage by a group of four strangers.  The strangers insist that they don't want to hurt the family - but that they must force the family to make a decision, one that will decide the fate of the planet.

**Warning: major plot spoilers ahead! (this is an M. Night Shyamalan film)**

Knock at the Cabin is a decently well-made psychological horror film, thanks to quality acting and some nice suspense, but it is ultimately ruined by taking the wrong path with its main plot and not exploiting the potential of its intriguing premise.  I don't usually watch horror films, and while I enjoyed M. Night Shyamalan's The Sixth Sense and Unbreakable, I haven't seen any other movies by him in a long time.  But I was drawn to the possibility of a horror of ideas rather than the blood and guts I avoid.  The cast does a good job here, creating a believable setup early on and holding it together as well as possible as the plot becomes strained to breaking.  Bautista, not the world's most talented actor IMO, brings a jarring, almost disturbing, gentility to his character.  His team - including Ron from Harry Potter - are bit players but interesting, and Aldridge and Groff as the dads help create some emotional connection to their plight.  The dialogue is decent, the pacing pretty good, and the tone stays pretty consistent and tense (at least until the very end).

The undoing of the movie comes in its creative choices.  The family is asked to sacrifice one of their own in order to avert a global apocalypse, so the main question is: is this just a sick game that the strangers are playing to terrorize the family, or do these seeming-wackos actually know something that could help prevent catastrophe?  From both a creative perspective and one relating to the real world we live in, the answer should have been: they're just wackos (even if sincere ones).  The apocalypse soon begins to unfold, one step at a time, and as it does, it gets more and more ridiculous rather than horrifying (giant tsunami? - OK; people filming planes falling out of the sky everywhere? unintentionally silly).  By going the other way, the film would give the family's resistance more meaning, and Shyamalan could have played with more tricks to make it seem like an apocalypse might occur.  Even more importantly, the apocalypse story line is exactly the wrong plot for our time.  Society often feels overrun with lunatic conspiracy theories - from vaccines killing people (or at least "tracking" them) to secret pedophile elites to rigged or stolen elections.  Knock at the Cabin could have sent a strong message by saying: the wackos may be sincere and scary, but they are WRONG.  Instead, we get just another series of inexplicable (the film doesn't even try to explain) disasters, as if asking the audience to shrug its shoulders and say "what a pity."

***

Well, my decision to go off my usual movie path, via Knock at the Cabin, was a failure.  I probably won't be going to see any more horror movies for a long time (by the way, what the heck is it that makes people want to see them - particularly the slashers?).  I do want to encourage Hollywood to try more intriguing ideas like this one starts out with - just make sure you've got filmmakers who can handle material that's outside the norm.  Hopefully there will be another Oscar contender or two coming to theaters before the ceremony arrives, but at the very least, fun action movies are right around the corner (starting with Ant-Man 3 next week!).  For now, skip this one and stay in for something better on streaming.




* By http://www.impawards.com/2023/knock_at_the_cabin_ver3.html, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=72371404

Saturday, January 28, 2023

The Fabelmans

 

Score:  B+

Directed by Steven Spielberg
Starring Gabriel LaBelle, Michelle Williams, Paul Dano
Running time: 151 minutes
Rated PG-13

Long Story Short:  Steven Spielberg puts a version of his upbringing on the big screen in The Fabelmans, an Oscar-contending drama.  Audiences get a vivid and intriguing portrait of a young Steven (here known as Sam) and his family, with strong performances from parents Michelle Williams and Paul Dano.  But I feel that it puts too much emphasis on this fairly typical (if well-produced) family drama and not enough on the young lead's prodigious artistic talent.  It is certainly worth a night at the theater, however, and your own consideration as it vies for Best Picture.


In the early 1950s, Burt (Dano) and Mitzi (Williams) Fabelman take their young son, Sam, to his first movie in the theater.  He is transfixed by a train crash and becomes obsessed with recreating it.  Before long, Sam fills his childhood days with film projects.  As the family moves from state to state, due to Burt's rising star career in computer science, cracks begin to form in their tight-knit relationships.  Artistic talent runs in the family on Mitzi's side - herself a gifted pianist - but Burt, while kind and patient, sees little use in such unpragmatic endeavors.  Like so many young people, Sam is forced to choose between his passions and expectations.

The Fabelmans is a very well-made movie as expected from legendary director Steven Spielberg, but it's much different than his usual work and suffers - in my opinion - from misplaced focus.  When I think of Spielberg, I first think about movies like Jurassic Park, Jaws, E.T., and Indiana Jones.  While he's made plenty of more serious movies, too, from Schindler's List to The Post, The Fabelmans is much closer to a more standard Oscar bait-y prestige drama than anything I've seen from him.  Digging deeper, most of his movies are story-focused, whether it's on fantastic or historic themes, with well-shaped characters to give them strong humanity.  This movie is the opposite, focusing on its characters and treating story as an add-on.  To Spielberg's credit, and his co-writer Tony Kushner and the performers, those characters are well done.  I especially liked the family relationships and dynamics, ranging from Sam's filming with his sisters and friends, to realistic parenting, to standout work from Michelle Williams as Sam's mom and a small but scene-stealing role for Judd Hirsch as his great-uncle.

The main problem of the film, to me, is one of misplaced focus with the story - what is usually Spielberg's greatest strength.  Perhaps this is because The Fabelmans is semi-autobiographical; he may have been understandably drawn to the more influential parts of his own life.  But as interesting as he makes his parents' broken relationship, it gradually takes over the movie, pushing Sam's/Steven's filmmaking development to the side.  There are some intriguing ways that Spielberg combine the two, during a fateful camping trip, and the performers - even a surprising Seth Rogen - do a great job with it.  However, I would have much preferred seeing Sam, who is kind of underdeveloped despite this being a two-and-a-half hour movie, kept in the center and going deeper into the neat, DIY movie world that's tantalizingly introduced.  There are several side elements - tension with Burt's career path, and connection with Mitzi's artistry - that definitely work well, so the opportunities to keep family life involved but secondary were there.  Sam's experience in a new school in the last third of the film is the worst and most awkward part of the biography, a failed attempt to give him more to do.  Between it and the divorce plot, the movie is just too sad - another departure from typical Spielberg.  If only it had been more consistently like the movie's final scene, one of its best.  Sam gets to meet his filmmaking idol, and the encounter is funny, creative, and positive, if a little tense at first.  That's what I expect from Spielberg.

***

Now that Oscar nominations have been made, The Fabelmans is the first of the contenders I've gotten to see in the run up to the ceremony (though I also saw a few others last year).  The Fabelmans is the latest in a trend of directors putting their own childhoods on the big screen; the immediate comparison to me is Alfonso Cuaron's Roma, though I'm pretty sure there are others.  If anyone has earned the right to a little personal artistic indulgence, it's Steven Spielberg.  I don't think this type of film is quite his wheelhouse yet he has still made a strong film; I just wish it was configured a bit differently.  Hopefully there will be some more awards contenders coming soon - mixed with some midwinter surprises.  Until next time!




* By Internet Movie Database, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=71702334

Saturday, January 21, 2023

The Pale Blue Eye

 

Score:  B

Directed by Scott Cooper
Starring Christian Bale, Harry Melling, Lucy Boynton, Toby Jones
Running time: 128 minutes
Rated R

Long Story Short:  Christian Bale stars as the detective in this gloomy period mystery that, for most people, is a Netflix-only streamer.  Bale's co-star, Melling, gets the famous role of Edgar Allen Poe, and not only are both of them great, but the acting all round is impressive.  Unfortunately, the pacing of the film is not great and some of the movie's potential - in story and character development - is lost as a result.  Still, it's worth taking a shot on it at home, as long as you're not looking for fast-paced or action-packed.


In 1830, the hanging of a cadet at West Point brings detective Augustus Landor (Bale) out of retirement to find the culprit.  He soon finds the crime is even more unusual than first observed, and the military academy is soon on edge.  Another cadet, by the name of Edgar A. Poe, takes interest in the case and offers his help to Landor.  While Poe is very bright and has essential institutional and personal experience, Landor becomes increasingly frustrated as he finds much silence and deceit, and little evidence.  After another murder, however, the urgency of the case grows as well as the danger to both Landor and Poe.

The Pale Blue Eye is a solid, suspenseful period mystery, highlighted by its actors, but it's held back from the top tier by a plodding pace and character and story development issues.  One of the film's strengths is its atmosphere, provided by nice cinematography that has a (literally and metaphorically) chilly feel and a tone that provides a sense of foreboding yet not outright horror (though a warning, there are a few gruesome shots).  Unfortunately, the movie starts out quite slowly; it really could have used a nice opening hook to pull the audience in more quickly.  The intrigue does build steadily, though, especially once all the main characters are introduced, but in the final third of the movie, the pace actually gets a little too quick in a few important spots.  Even as the quality of the central mystery ebbs and flows, though, the acting is a pleasure throughout.  Christian Bale, the lead as the detective, is great, of course, in a fairly spare yet still entertaining way.  Harry Melling (nasty cousin Dudley from Harry Potter) is the surprise standout as the famous Poe, just a lowly cadet in this film.  His accent, style of speech, and subtle body language are all great and he strikes the right balance of being utterly confident in his intelligence yet at times reluctant or passive due to his low social standing.  There are plenty of fun supporting roles, too, from an at-the-breaking-point matriarch (Anderson) and her sought-after but independent daughter (Boynton) to the head officers at West Point (McBurney and Spall).

A good mystery reveals information - evidence, characters' relationships, etc. - at just the right times, to build suspense and keep the audience as highly engaged as possible.  Unfortunately, The Pale Blue Eye fumbles this a bit.  For example, there is a major twist at the end of the film and while surprising (to me), it both makes sense and has the potential for an emotionally impactful ending.  The problem is that we are given only the tiniest clues about this twist earlier in the film and, more importantly, insufficient personal development to prepare the audience and "earn" that final twist.  And while the Landor-Poe relationship is developed well, certain side characters - some of whom become crucial to the mystery - are introduced too late and their development is taken as a given when it really isn't, leading to that "did I miss something?" feeling.  The running time of just over two hours is in theory ideal, yet it seems both drawn out and rushed at times thanks to the pacing issues.

***

For the first (and probably last) time ever, I got to see a movie that was playing "only in select theaters" - thanks to the fact that part of it was filmed in my neck of the woods (including on the college campus where I work!).  So I must admit that I was a little distracted while watching it, since I was on the look out for scenes in places personally familiar to me.  When the movie ended, I felt rather disappointed but my opinion of it has improved as I've thought about it more.  Ultimately, I'd say it's worth watching, primarily for the really good acting, but a Netflix viewing is probably sufficient (even though I still am very much in favor of going to a theater to see a movie rather than at home...).  After this, I'm hopeful that Oscar movie season will finally get in full swing - and in fact, a major awards contender is coming to my theater next week!  So stay tuned, and check this one out if you get the chance.



* By Netflix - Netflix., Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=72253321

Saturday, December 17, 2022

Spirited

 


Score:  A

Directed by Sean Anders
Starring Will Ferrell, Ryan Reynolds, Octavia Spencer
Running time: 127 minutes
Rated PG-13

Long Story Short:  Funny guys Ferrell and Reynolds team up in one of the starriest Christmas movies in years, a new Christmas Carol adaptation.  It's a shame this was not produced as a wide theatrical release (I got lucky it was in my local theater), as it's a great cinematic experience.  The stars are on their game and, with a wildly creative script behind them, everything falls into place.  Highly recommended, even if (*sigh*) you have to stream it.


Not content with their work on Mr. Scrooge, Jacob Marley and the Ghosts of Christmas Past, Present, and Yet-To-Come are still at work in the world, helping one "perp" at a time.  Christmas Present (Ferrell), who has worked well past retirement age, finds one last perp, named Clint (Reynolds), he wants to turn around, despite Marley's objections.  Clint soon turns out to be one of the most challenging cases yet, though, and the annual pattern of redemption soon falls apart.  The spirit world and the living world begin to intertwine, and more is changed than just one rotten soul.

Spirited is an excellent new holiday movie, its acting, humor, creativity, and themes coming together for one of the more truly magical experiences to come along in years.  The story is, of course, a variation on A Christmas Carol - but only the broadest elements (the Ghosts, tale of redemption) remain alongside a fresh, modernized plot.  Some adaptations/reboots just make a mess of things when they try to do that, but the creativity of Spirited's world and the quality of its development are top-notch.  Much of the film's considerable humor comes from its stars' talent, but a good part of it comes from winking at or poking fun of itself ("not another song!!").  While the songs and the dancing are not quite as spectacular as some other recent musicals, they are still very impressive, with both Ferrell and Reynolds performing well alongside plenty of professional background players.  Spirited also, in my view, makes better use of its musical scenes to further the narrative - and I found it much easier to understand what they were singing, too!

Along with the showy musical numbers, there is some neat effects work, particularly as the characters quickly move through time periods and locations.  However, it's the characters and acting that hold the most interest, as the best movies do.  Will Ferrell and Ryan Reynolds are perfectly cast, to start, and have great chemistry.  It's been some time now since Ferrell's heyday, and this is a great transition role in his career.  He still gets the lead (he's 1A, Reynolds is 1B) which means he plays a bit more of the straightforward role, yet he's still got plenty of quirks, allowing his comedic sensibility to flourish; a little Elf here, a little Anchorman there.  But he also shows impressive dramatic range too, as he has in Stranger Than Fiction and others.  Reynolds, the star here who's in his prime, provides the wattage needed for his role - a big, confident, um, asshole.  Yes, Reynolds is an unusual star who can convincingly play an anti-hero but still be sympathetic.  Octavia Spencer gets the top supporting role, and good for the filmmakers to finally move her away from her typical characters; she's much more balanced here, though not a major presence.  And the rest of the cast is stuffed with good performances, especially Patrick Page's Marley, Sunita Mani's Christmas Past, and a few hilarious surprises (don't spoil them for yourself!).  The movie is well-paced, with plenty of "action" (simply meaning, "things happening") and great dialogue.  And while the themes and messages are similar to what you've seen before, of course, they are very well focused and developed, leading to a conclusion that earns its emotional pay off.

***

I'm glad that I got to see Spirited in theaters at all, since I thought that this would only be streaming.  Hopefully you'll have a chance to see it that way, too, as it's definitely worth the trip!  Rotten Tomatoes gave this, along with fellow holiday movie standout Violent Night, positive but underwhelming scores: don't listen to the critics!  These are very different approaches to the genre, of course, but both are very worthy additions to the Christmas canon (Spirited will have a broader audience thanks to its lack of bloody violence).  Well, this may be it for me for the holiday season at the movie theater, a much different one than usual.  First, I saw not one but two holiday genre movies (which is rare), but I also may not see any blockbuster movies (also rare; the one that is available this year is the Avatar sequel, but I thought the original was way overrated and I don't want to contribute my money to James Cameron's ego).  Hopefully movies with Oscar buzz will soon make their way to theaters as we get closer to awards season.


* By Apple TV+ - http://www.impawards.com/2022/posters/spirited_ver5_xxlg.jpg, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=71831081