Tuesday, June 27, 2023

Elemental

 

Score:  A

Directed by Peter Sohn
Starring Leah Lewis, Mamoudou Athie, Ronnie del Carmen, Catherine O'Hara
Running time: 109 minutes
Rated PG

Long Story Short:  Pixar is back in theaters at long last* with Elemental, and it feels just like the good old days.  The premise is among Pixar's cleverest and most effective, using a city of element-people to bring to life both a heart-bursting rom-com as well as a poignant immigrant story.  The animation is as astounding as ever and the humor and emotions will send you soaring just like you remember.  Highly recommended for, like all Pixar films, any audience, from young families to cinephiles.
(*last year's Lightyear was technically Pixar's return to theaters, but I didn't see it and it didn't really seem like a true Pixar film, you know?)


Element City is a special place, one that, over the years, has adopted - but not yet fully integrated -  a colorful set of people in the form of elements: Fire, Water, Air, and Earth.  Ember (Lewis) lives with her parents in the Fire section of the city where they run the neighborhood bodega.  Ember is set to inherit the shop one day, but, appropriate to her element, must first overcome a quick and powerful temper.  Another obstacle to her taking over the Fireplace soon arrives when a dreaded water leak develops in the basement.  There is only so much that Ember can do by herself, so she is forced to trust in the other elements in the city around her for help.  It's a test of compatibility in a city long kept separated out of fear and ignorance.

Elemental is a great animated film with all of Pixar's typically great visual design, cleverness, and emotional impact, and its story is particularly well-suited to the animation format.  As you've likely glimpsed from trailers, Pixar's latest provides a nice, bright, poppy color palette for its summer release.  What I only truly appreciated in the theater, though, was the extraordinary texture effects of the elements, particularly Fire and Water (the two main elements in the film).  Pixar has again made the seemingly impossible appear effortless with the natural blurriness and flicker of flames and the smooth but erratic-seeming flow of drips of water.  The idea of elements as people (a bit like Inside Out's emotions) also leads to much of the humor, which is very well done.  Most of it happens naturally, within the flow of "normal" element-city life: water's tendency to cry and the unique products of the Fireplace were some of my favorites.  It's not all happy, bright colors and jokes, though: Pixar makes Element City parallel to real cities in its incorporation of "immigrant" communities (exemplified here by Fire).  The differences among the elements naturally lead to this comparison - and to the implicit segregation - and the effect is moving but not unduly heavy.

Helping to balance out the immigrant themes - some of Pixar's most serious yet - is the rom-com aspect of the story.  You'll find many of the usual genre beats: the awkward first meeting, the jaunt around town together, the traumatic split before the final act, etc.  And just as the use of elements is a good illustration of immigration, the very format of animation turns out to be a great one for romantic comedy.  The characters in Elemental are as expressive as live-action humans, thanks to Pixar's artists, but we're still watching clearly non-human beings.  That allows you to more easily project your own mental images into the story, as rom-coms are so good at inviting us to do.  With a screen packed full of imagination, audiences might therefore have even more going on in their heads than during the usual Pixar adventure.  Speaking of characters, it was nice to see Pixar turn to a cast of (relative) unknowns for the voice acting.  Of course, it's great to give new talent a chance to shine (or rather, to be heard) but it also doubles down on the audience's impressions of the characters or story not being colored by familiar personas - via sight or sound.  Finally, Elemental's animation also allows the action to more closely match the intensity and wonder of the relationship's emotions, from a spectacular underwater date to a perilous and tearful (but ultimately happy!) finale.

***

It was so great to see a Pixar movie in the theater again!  The last time I saw one was 2019's Toy Story 4, which feels like forever ago.  While the premise, or the part of it I got from the trailer, didn't grab my interest at first, I knew immediately that I had to go see it - and, just like most Pixar films, it exceeded my expectations.  Part of my enthusiasm could be the excitement of the theatrical experience but looking back, even when it occasionally seems that a part of the story fell flat or wasn't going anywhere, the movie either quickly got back on track or turned the weakness into a key development later on.  Also: Pixar continues to include a short story before the main film, this time about Up's Carl and dog, Dug.  It's one of the best yet!  So be sure to see this one in a theater while you can.  Amid a sea of summer sequels - even the good ones - it's so refreshing to see another Pixar hit.




* By Pixar - http://www.impawards.com/2023/elemental_ver10.html, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=73800022

Saturday, June 17, 2023

Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse

 

Score:  B+

Directed by Joaquim Dos Santos, Kemp Powers, and Justin K. Thompson
Starring Shameik Moore, Hailee Steinfeld, Brian Tyree Henry, Luna Lauren Velez, Oscar Isaac, et. al.
Running time: 140 minutes
Rated PG

Long Story Short:  Spider-Man leaps back into the fray, this time in animated form, in a sequel to 2018's Into the Spider-Verse.  Like that film, this one focuses on a theme of multiverses, where there's not just one Spider-Man but many.  We get to focus on Miles and Gwen, here, mostly, and their personal stories are well done.  While there's good action, too, the plot is just OK.  Put all that aside, though: the visuals alone are worth the price of admission, with dazzling color and thoughtful detail and styles.


More than a year after Into the Spider-Verse introduced the Spider-People of multiple universes, Miles (Moore) and Gwen (Steinfeld) find themselves alone again in their own universes.  The multiverse will not let them go so easily, however.  Gwen meets a new team of multiverse Spiders while battling a villain, and Miles confronts a different villain who can open portals at will himself.  The two good friends are joyful when they finally reunite, but circumstances are much different than when they last met.  Both are dealing with difficult personal problems at home as a result of their superhero activities, and both have urgent Spider-missions, ones that are not necessarily aligned with each other.  They must learn more about the wild multiverse they've become a part of, soon, though, and rely on both new and old friends to avert disaster.

Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse is a solid, very entertaining sequel to the 2018 animated original film.  By far the best part of it is the astonishing visuals, though it is weighed down a bit by a too-familiar plot.  Although the style is much different, Across the Spider-Verse is just as jaw-dropping as the best Pixar animation.  While it mostly has a fairly realistic physical sense, the colors in particular are quite malleable and serve as the most interesting part of most of the film, whether through sheer beauty or emphasis of the emotional tone/mood of a scene.  It has a distinctive style throughout, but it also retains plenty of flexibility, too.  Just remarkable, and begging to be seen on the big screen.  There is plenty of action, of course, being a superhero movie, and the animation is both particularly appropriate for Spider-Man (with all his web-based "flying", "lassoing" and other acrobatics) and helps suspend your disbelief.  The action can go on a bit too long, and one particularly wild chase is a little overboard, but that's mostly quibbling - it's a lot of fun.  Speaking of too long, the film overall is also too long, even if for the noble intention of trying to pay as much attention to the personal parts as the action.

The characters and plot of Across the Spider-Verse are well-developed, although the results are somewhat mixed.  To start with, the whole multiverse concept is getting a bit tiring.  The current series of live-action Marvel films uses it as its main connecting theme; last year's Oscar winner Everything Everywhere... was built on it, and, of course, the 2018 animated original used it, too.  There was always going to be some element of the multiverse involved (Miles and Gwen had to get back together somehow!), but the film leans into it even harder this time.  Even the switch of focus away from the villain and onto the team of Spider-People - who ostensibly should be good but hide a more dubious goal - feels overly familiar.  This is made up for in good measure by a solid family story and structure for both Miles and Gwen - and in part, it's because we don't get the way-too-familiar Aunt May/Uncle Ben dynamic.  Miles, in particular, feels very well-rounded here.  An adult Peter Parker, voiced by funnyman Jake Johnson, is a bright spot again, basically just serving as comic relief (and now with baby in tow).  On the other hand, Steinfeld's Gwen and Isaac's Miguel grated on me a bit.  I think it's because they've both recently starred in live-action Marvel series, too, and their usual personas are on display.  Even though it's only their voices, I still felt like I was watching recycled roles.

***

Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse vaults to the top of my superhero list for the year, thanks to Marvel producing - unprecedentedly - back-to-back disappointments (Ant-Man 3 and Guardians 3 - maybe it's curse of the 3s this year?).  It was a very fun time at the theater, even if I don't feel gushing about it.  That may in part be because my attention wandered a bit more than usual; and I haven't seen the 2018 original since it was in theaters five years ago.  Still, I highly recommend it (family-friendly, too!).  DC will have the next few cracks at the superhero genre, starting with The Flash.  I'll also be seeing another animated movie again, Elemental, quite soon - my first new Pixar in theaters since Toy Story 4 in 2019.  Hopefully the summer will bring more movie goodness!




* By https://twitter.com/SpiderVerse/status/1651254816025313281/photo/1, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=72536149

Sunday, May 14, 2023

Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3

 

Score:  B-

Directed by James Gunn
Starring Chris Pratt, Zoe Saldana, Dave Bautista, Karen Gillan, Pom Klementieff, Bradley Cooper
Running time: 150 minutes
Rated PG-13

Long Story Short:  The third Guardians movie sees the team of lovable losers continue to try to protect the vast (and always wild) frontier in space.  Unfortunately, Vol. 3 is closer in most ways to the disappointing Vol. 2 than to the incredibly creative and successful original movie.  There are some interesting ideas and character developments, moreso at least than its predecessor.  But while the action is impressive at times, it is simply too bloated, squeezing out or minimizing everything else.  Worth a theater trip if you're a Marvel fan or need big blockbuster action; otherwise, wait for streaming.


The Guardians of the Galaxy have established a home on the strange celestial artifact, Knowhere - but the past will not let them go.  Peter Quill, aka Star-Lord, can't get past his "double" loss of Gamora (Saldana), killed by Thanos but then "returning" via a parallel universe.  This new Gamora, however, neither knows nor likes Quill.  Rocket is still haunted by the grotesque experiments performed upon him years ago.  And Nebula still searches for her place on the team after having been Thanos's loyal servant.  A sudden attack, however, puts Rocket's life in danger, and so the Guardians return to space to find a way to save him.  Along the way, they encounter both old friends as well as a new adversary who hopes to rid the galaxy of its "imperfections" - misfits like the Guardians themselves.

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 is an entertaining blockbuster start to the summer, but like Vol. 2 before it, it does not live up to the original due to trading too much of its cleverness and character chemistry for the spectacle.  I'll start with the good.  There is an overabundance of action, yes, but admittedly it is pretty impressive for the most part.  There are still a few neat ideas (like an organic space station), and the special effects are high-quality.  The first action scene, with the god-like Warlock attacking the Guardians in Knowhere, is jarring for its suddenness and intensity (not to mention its consequences).  The movie is also brimming with interesting ideas, and its underlying theme contrasting the villain's goal of creating a perfect sentient organism with the Guardians' core quality of being the "cast-off" heroes is appropriate.  I liked that they continued Avengers: Endgame's Quill-Gamora dynamic, as he fights to win her back in vain.  And most of all, I liked the backstory given to Rocket.  We already knew the broad strokes of how he became a super-intelligent raccoon, but his character deserved this deeper dive into how it psychologically shaped him.  Rocket befriended with several other similarly-victimized creatures during his captivity, all of them adorable despite their mutilations; it helps that they have super cute voices (especially Cardellini, sounding heavenly).  Their introduction, as they console and embrace Rocket, the new guy, is the most touching of the movie.

Despite the not-insignificant bright spots, Guardians Vol. 3 ultimately wastes more potential than it fulfills due to its sprawling emphasis on the action.  There are at least three large-scale set pieces, and each of them is unnecessarily drawn out, each more so than the next and representing weaknesses carried over from Vol. 2.  The first, on the organic station, had good potential and a few nice quips - but also forces the humor just as much, and feigns high stakes and danger before wiping it all away in a flash.  The second battle is on an "artificial" Earth (think the suburbs with anthropomorphized critters as neighbors).  Mass, breathtaking damage and casualties ensue, which feels wrong for the Guardians tone and the toll is barely acknowledged (reminding me of Vol. 2's mass-murdering arrow).  And the third, finale action scene is the longest of them all, between two gigantic space vessels and the dozens of characters within them.  It is often incomprehensible - even for a Marvel movie nut like me - and moments of deus ex machina just pile up.  Each of these three mega battle scenes have some good to offer - but they all simply go overboard and the weaknesses, at times just from shoddy writing, are too glaring.  With so much time spent on these battles, there is also just not enough to devote to the intriguing themes and characters I previously described - despite the moving being 2.5 hours long.  Especially with this being the likely end of the Guardians as we've known them, I'm disappointed that they decided to go out with more literal bangs than narrative/character ones. (I also didn't like the needle-drop soundtrack on this one nearly as much as the first two movies - but opinions on that will differ!) 

***

Guardians Vol. 3 was a stuttering - though not awful - start to the summer movie season.  It also is a startling second-straight disappointment from Marvel this year, following Ant-Man 3.  I'm a bit nervous that, in trying to top the movies that culminated in Endgame, Marvel is going the conventional blockbuster direction of simply amping up the action and the special effects.  I would much prefer less of that and more character and narrative development (which some recent Marvel movies have indeed done well).  Two new Disney+ streaming series are coming soon, and I think November's The Marvels will be a big test for the franchise to see what direction - in tone and style - it wants to go.  I also want to say that, following Guardians Vols. 2 and 3 and The Suicide Squad, I'm increasingly skeptical of James Gunn's talent.  But he will now be the (or one of the main) driving forces behind DC's superhero films starting soon - good luck with that!  Well, that's a lot of superhero talk, but there are plenty of fun-looking movies in other genres coming out in the next couple months.  Stay tuned!



* By http://www.impawards.com/2023/guardians_of_the_galaxy_vol_three_ver2.html, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=72394795

Saturday, April 29, 2023

Renfield

 

Score:  B+

Directed by Chris McKay
Starring Nicholas Hoult, Nicolas Cage, Awkwafina
Running time: 93 minutes
Rated R

Long Story Short:  The monster genre receives a needed dose of humor with Renfield, focusing on the famed Dracula's servant familiar.  Hoult and cult-status star Cage (both Nicholases!) do great work, and even better is the interesting contrast of a classic "toxic" relationship with the modern world's determination to end those predicaments.  Ultimately it's an action-comedy, but you'll be surprised by its level of quality.  Highly recommended (if you can take the blood and guts).


Renfield (Hoult) is tired of his life of evil.  For over a hundred years, he has been Count Dracula's (Cage) familiar - or servant - given a supernaturally-extended life in exchange for providing his master with fresh human meals.  From their current hideout in New Orleans, Renfield seeks help in a community mutual aid group where victims of bad relationships and situations console and support each other.  In branching out, Renfield discovers the modern world's more conventional evil through the mob, and meets one of the few police officers willing to take it head on.  There is a lot going against Renfield and his new friend, but together they are determined to make the world a better place.

Renfield is a surprisingly good action-comedy movie, thanks especially to some really fun performances and a clever, well-executed premise.  Despite being a Dracula movie, this is not a horror movie (and I would know, not being a fan of the genre).  Instead, it's more like tongue-in-cheek modern actioners like Cage's own Kick-Ass (which I'd also highly recommend).  Renfield also has that movie's body count and blood and gore, so be warned!  Beyond the stylishness, though, Renfield is more notable for its clever combination of the classic - i.e., old-fashioned - monster genre with modern social-psychological themes like co-dependency and support groups.  This odd mashup actually works well, and provides the basis for the movie's plentiful humor by contrasting the ridiculousness of Renfield's supernatural "relationship" to Dracula with his dully modern methods of dealing with it.  I should note that while other movies have interesting premises, too, Renfield truly makes good on it, scene by scene, thanks to a strong script.  There are also more generic old world-new world funny comparisons, of course, (from language to wardrobe) but the movie wisely doesn't focus on them.  There are a few moments when the theme feels a little overdone, but Renfield's well-edited, compact 90-minute running time makes these fleeting.  There is also a side yet parallel theme of our modern world's own monsters (e.g., the mob) and their enablers (corrupt cops) - but this is still an action-comedy, so it doesn't try to dig too deep.

For more visceral entertainment, Renfield also has plenty of fun acting and exciting action scenes.  Nicholas Hoult is the titular lead and he continues to show that he is among his generation's finest actors (be sure to stream last year's The Menu for a much different performance).  Despite technically being the lackey, Hoult makes Renfield a strong, compelling lead as a man turned monster, trying to become a man once again.  And Nicolas Cage is perfectly cast as Dracula - though just as appropriately, his screen time is somewhat limited to let the effect really "sink in".  Crazy he may be, but Cage channels a creepy and intense, yet often quite funny, vibe - he sucks in the camera and your attention and won't let go.  A pair of quality comedians co-star, in Awkwafina's good cop Rebecca and Ben Schwartz's entitled Mob heir.  Awkwafina's "cut the crap" attitude is well-suited here and Schwartz basically reprises his Parks & Rec character (also a perfect fit).  There are other side players, too, my favorite of which are the members of Renfield's support group.  Those scenes, plus the odd couple of Renfield and Rebecca, are highlights, but the action is fun, too.  Best of all - to me - is that it strikes the right balance of keeping the movie lively but not being so frequent or extended as to become numbing or dull.  Slightly over-the-top audible crunches and rips accompany the mayhem, making you cringe as limbs are torn apart.  The first one, involving some low-level drug dealers who you quickly come to pity, is particularly well done. Finally, the production work is really well done, too, with great makeup and costuming.  CGI is kept to a relative minimum (though nicely done to insert Cage as Dracula into classic scenes).

***

After a slow start to the year, the spring has provided some really good theater experiences.  Renfield is the kind of movie I usually skip, but I was drawn to it by my admiration for Hoult and curiosity in Cage - its being presented as a comedy helped, too. That all panned out even better than I expected, to go with the well-conceived psychological themes.  In many ways, this is exactly the kind of movie I want to see more of from Hollywood.  It's not completely original, of course, but it puts the familiar (Dracula, etc.) into a fun new context, and this is the focus.  It's also very well made, from performances to production to script, while also not trying to be more than it really is.  Hopefully there is more to come along those lines, especially as we get ready to enter the summer movie season!  In the meantime, if you do want something literally more like Renfield - in other words, funny vampire stuff - check out the Leslie Nielsen-Mel Brooks collaboration Dracula: Dead and Loving It and the TV show What We Do in the Shadows.




* By Universal Pictures - https://www.universalpictures.com/movies/renfield, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=72674354

Thursday, April 13, 2023

Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves

 

Score:  A-

Directed by Jonathan Goldstein and John Francis Daley
Starring Chris Pine, Michelle Rodriguez, Justice Smith, Sophia Lillis
Running time: 134 minutes
Rated PG-13

Long Story Short:  Nerd-favorite Dungeons & Dragons returns to the big screen, and unlike most game adaptations, this one notches a high score.  It's very much a fantasy in its magical worldbuilding, but it does so in clever, cheeky, and often hilarious ways.  The cast, led by a game Chris Pine, is very solid and makes you feel like you're on a true adventure with them and not simply in a race to an inevitable, boring climactic battle.  Highly recommended for all, not just fantasy fans.


Forced to labor away in a prison mine in a fantastical land, Edgin (Pine) has seen his once noble life as a heroic knight, husband, and father crumble around him.  Longing for redemption and his family, Edgin breaks free along with his loyal partner Holga (Rodriguez).  The outside world has changed drastically since he last saw it, however, and Edgin finds he can no longer count on old allies or customs.  So Edgin, facing danger beyond any he has known before, must draw from both his courage and his shadier side; and depend on not just faithful Holga but also unusual and unexpected new friends.

Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves is one of the most entertaining fantasy movies in years, a bit of a throwback in its avoidance of the genre's dreary pitfalls while also providing exceptional humor.  I don't really know much about D&D, other than a passing familiarity with how the game works - wisely, the film doesn't expect you to know anything.  It hits a nice, irreverent sweet spot, with a light tone but not one that tumbles into eye-rolling parody.  The plot is nothing special, but I appreciate two things about it: one, it's not yet another end-of-the-world epic, and two, it is solid enough to hold up yet makes way for other elements to shine.  One of those elements is the action, which is great in both its quantity and quality.  There is not too much in the way of standard fighting, as none of the characters can simply punch their way to victory; instead, they rely on cleverness.  And there are also few big CGI scenes; the ones that impress most are those with the best design, such as a shapeshifter frantically changing between animal forms while trying to escape, and a moving-caravan heist in which magical portals make you lose track of up and down.

D&D doesn't feature any all-time classic characters, but it still has a fun roster that easily carries the film with its charisma and chemistry.  Pine brings the great mischievousness that he showed as Captain Kirk, though with only a small dose of that icon's heroism.  But he isn't an anti-hero, either; just a guy with a lot of flaws that you still root for.  If anything, Rodriguez's Holga is the more traditional hero type, or at least action star, as she shows in a handful of scenes kicking soldiers' butts.  The dynamic between Edgin and Holga feels fresh, in both subtle and not-so-subtle ways, disrupting the typical gender balance.  Yendar, played by Bridgerton hunk Rege-Jean Page, is what you'd expect in the lead role, but he only gets a few minutes and gets poked fun at for most of that time.  Hugh Grant's Forge steals many scenes, which leads to the movie's strength: its sense of humor.  From the first scene through the last (stay for the credits!), laughs abound.  Most of it is slapstick, but very well-written and performed at that, and not just the human characters but also an obese beast and an animatronic avian.  Even with all the good humor, though, D&D is lent some weight by Edgin's quest for his daughter - not just for her safety but also for her forgiveness.

***

I didn't think I would see D&D in the theater, but after some positive word-of-mouth, I gave it a try and I'm glad that I did.  Part of my reluctance was due to the poor track record of movie adaptations of games (video, board, or otherwise) and part was due to a general weariness toward fantasy.  But D&D overcame both of those concerns easily.  Only a few brief moments reminded me that it was based on a game, and it distinguished itself clearly from its genre peers in its high quality, creativity, and sheer, genuine fun.  I'm not sure how I feel about the idea of a sequel... but I would definitely like to see more movies - in all genres - with its thoughtfulness, cohesion, and good spirit.  Check this one out in theaters!




* By Paramount Pictures - https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2906216/mediaviewer/rm2360753153/?ref_=tt_ov_i, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=72830741

Saturday, March 18, 2023

Creed III

 

Score:  A-

Directed by Michael B. Jordan
Starring Michael B. Jordan, Jonathan Majors, Tessa Thompson
Running time: 116 minutes
Rated PG-13

Long Story Short:  Creed III returns Adonis "Donnie" Creed, son of Apollo, to the ring in a conclusion to the smash hit trilogy spin-off of the Rocky boxing franchise.  Star Michael B. Jordan also directs here and does a great job, with the help of a rock-solid script.  Jonathan Majors, playing Donnie's childhood friend, is a worthy foil both in and out of the arena, and we get a satisfying conclusion to Donnie's journey.  Highly recommended.


After defeating the man who gave him his only career loss, thus becoming the undisputed boxing champion of the world, Donnie (Jordan) retires to focus on his family, wife Biance (Thompson) and young, deaf daughter Amara.  While working in his gym training the next generation of boxers, Donnie gets an unexpected visit from a childhood friend, a man he hasn't seen for nearly twenty years.  The old friend, Dame (Majors), soon begins to disrupt Donnie's well-laid retirement plans.  In order to secure his future, Donnie must make peace with his past, and part of that requires stepping into the ring, one last time.

Creed III is a very well-made film in star Michael B. Jordan's directorial debut, a solid and satisfying conclusion to the trilogy spun off from the Rocky series - but fully proven on its own merits.  The highlight of the movie is Donnie's development and emotional payoff.  Still, it offers pure entertainment value from the training and boxing scenes, too.  It's difficult to do a lot different than what we've seen from the first two films, but Jordan finds a nice balance of providing short, intense bursts of action - notably the training montage - interspersed within the drama.  Dame's first fight was the most interesting to me, largely for its unpredictability and tension.  The final fight is not the greatest from a purely visceral standpoint, but it incorporates some dream-like elements that effectively convey the personal stakes.  Creed III also gets most of the "side" elements right, such as avoiding Stallone's Rocky altogether; this film is where Donnie and his family needed to stand by themselves.  There are also good parts for Donnie's mother, who has an important role in the plot, and daughter, who shares some sweet scenes with Jordan and really completes the sense of family and symbolizes Donnie's new focus.

The best part of Creed III is its completion of the character's arc, specifically his confrontation with his past in the form of old friend Dame.  While the first film provided glimpses of Donnie's childhood, we get a much fuller picture here, including an extended flashback scene.  It makes clear just how much Donnie has changed - yet believably so - to become the personally- and professionally-successful man he is; and also a vivid, heartbreaking look at a close young friendship cut short.  Jordan and the film's writers do more showing than telling, including when Donnie reunites, awkwardly, with Dame so many years later.  They get the right balance between psychoanalytical and crudely direct and simplistic, either of which it could easily have become.  Jordan is a great actor here again, and he is matched by Majors's Dame.  So much is said by what Dame doesn't say about how he feels about Donnie and the past; his body language and decisions tell you all you need to know.  Bianca also gets a modest yet nice role, in the kind of movie where her part would usually just disappear.  Her relationship with Donnie is subtle and evolved, and her own career has continued to develop.  One of the film's most poignant moments is when she tells Donnie that she has learned to enjoy the good that life has brought her, even though it has fallen short of her dreams.  If Donnie stayed true to this idea, he wouldn't have come out of retirement - but then we wouldn't have a movie!  Still, it was easy for me to suspend my disbelief, and Donnie's conversation with Dame after the fight makes it all worth it.

***

Creed III is the first really good movie of the year I've seen, one that in a way is eight years late.  I should have seen the first Creed in theaters, back in 2015, but didn't.  I skipped the second one, too, since I hadn't seen the first, but I was determined to finally go to the theater for the third one.  So I streamed the first two movies last week (on HBO Max) to prepare for it, and the first one, especially, was so good that I became even more eager to see Creed III.  While the second movie is weaker than the others, it's still enjoyable, so I'd rank the Creed trilogy among the best I've seen.  There are several more movies I'm looking forward to this spring, so keep your eyes peeled for more reviews!  In the mean time, if you haven't seen this one, I highly recommend it (for the best experience, make sure you've seen the other two first).




* By Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer - http://www.impawards.com/2023/creed_iii_ver4.html, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=72052033

Saturday, March 11, 2023

2022 "On Your Left" Film Year-in-Review

 

2022 "On Your Left" Film Year-in-Review

It's that time again - celebrating a year's worth of movies!  The cinematic schedule was pretty much back to pre-pandemic patterns in 2022, although the number of movies released was still way down, along with the overall box office.  But there were still plenty of fun movies to go see.  Granted, it was more tilted than ever toward action and fantasy movies, as well as other big draws (horror, family movies, etc.).  I was also disappointed to see more and more movies released streaming only - like the Knives Out sequel and The Gray Man blockbuster - that should have gone to theaters.  Hopefully, a virtuous cycle of Hollywood releasing higher-quality and more varied movies in theaters with audiences increasingly getting their butts off the couch and into those theaters will pick up steam in 2023.

Here is the format of this post, same as in years past:
  • Top 10 films of the year!
  • Most underrated/overrated films
  • Most surprising/disappointing films
  • Worst film of the year
  • List of other films I saw in theaters (with links to my reviews)
  • Films I saw on streaming
Please check out my companion post here, which is more like my Oscar-style awards.  I hope you'll check out some of these movies for yourself!


Top 10 Films of 2022

10. The Fabelmans (Directed by Steven Spielberg; starring Gabriel LaBelle, Michelle Williams, Paul Dano)

One of the few straightforward dramas I saw in theaters last year, The Fabelmans is quite a departure for the legendary Spielberg.  Joining the trend of filmmakers dipping into their personal lives for the themes - and even characters and plots - of their movies, there are no scary beasts, whip-cracking adventurers, or soaring John Williams themes.  Instead we get a pretty normal family, featuring a son growing up and into filmmaking, and his parents' tumultuous relationship.  Spielberg does well with this more standard dramatic material but it's sadder, and at times harsher, than you'd expect from the living legend.  There's no way this one will stick with me like most of his filmography, but it's a quality film.

9. Everything Everywhere All At Once (Directed by Dan Kwan & Daniel Scheinert; starring Michelle Yeoh, Stephanie Hsu, Ke Huy Quan)

As its title suggests, Everything Everywhere All At Once is the most off-the-wall movie of the year.  It is so many things at once, in fact, that it's hard to define it succinctly, except that by the end, you feel like you've just woken from a dream.  Michelle Yeoh, of Crouching Tiger... fame, is in her wheelhouse with the stellar martial arts choreography, though her laundromat owning-character takes some time to adjust to it.  The timing of the multiverse plot, considering its heavy use in Marvel films and others recently, dampens the appeal of that aspect.  But the family dynamics, particularly with wayward, funky daughter Joy (Hsu) make up for it.  See it once for a unique movie experience - and maybe again!

8. The Menu (Directed by Mark Mylod; starring Anya Taylor-Joy, Ralph Fiennes, Nicholas Hoult)

Despite my aversion to horror movies, I almost went to see this in the theater, thanks to good actors and an interesting premise.  Shame on me for not going.  In some ways it's a pretty typical horror setup: a young couple takes off on a fun getaway, only to slowly realize that there are more sadistic plans at hand.  As someone who rolls his eyes at foodies, though, this is a brilliant parody of that culture, and particularly the obscenely rich ones who take it up for the sole purpose of lording it over others.  Taylor-Joy is a cunning, sympathetic audience surrogate, Fiennes is an obsessed villain who is strikingly complex, and Holt is a hoot.  I'll still pass on most horror movies... but I'm definitely up for more like this one.

7. Thor: Love and Thunder (Directed by Taika Waititi; starring Chris Hemsworth, Natalie Portman, Christian Bale)

Debuting in 2011 as a fairly typical fantasy character, Thor has changed significantly over the years, now on his fourth solo film.  It was filmmaker Taika Waititi who led the evolution, in 2017's Ragnarok, injecting his eccentric sense of humor into the character.  Waititi returns for Love and Thunder which, while not quite as good, is still among the better Marvel movies (a big compliment from me) and has Thor's most poignant moments yet.  We get plenty of humor here, from an awkward separation from the Guardians to a daintily-toga'd Russell Crowe, even if it's just short of too silly.  But we also get great stakes and impact, from new villain Gorr (Bale) to old squeeze Jane (Portman).  Underrated!

6. Violent Night (Directed by Tommy Wirkola; starring David Harbour, John Leguizamo, Leah Brady)

You'll never hear Santa say "ho, ho, ho!" quite the same way after seeing this one.  I rarely see Christmas movies in the theater, but 2022 had not just one but two holidays standouts.  Throw Home Alone, Die Hard, and John Wick in a blender, and this is what you get.  If Santa had been miscast, this could have been a rough watch, but David Harbour is perfect in the role, both grizzled and tough as well as possessing St. Nick's good cheer (down deep, at least).  Seeing Santa in hand-to-hand combat with a baddie for the first time is so ludicrous that you can't help but laugh, and the Big Guy "levels up" to some pretty bad ass mayhem by the end.  Not for everyone, clearly, but it somehow just gets most things right.

5. The Banshees of Inisherin (Directed by Martin McDonagh; starring Colin Farrell, Brendan Gleeson, Kerry Condon)

This black dramedy is my favorite "traditional"* Best Picture nominee this year.  While I haven't seen the trio's first film together, In Bruges, Banshees makes me glad that director McDonagh reunited with Farrell and Gleeson.  Little of any consequence really happens here, and that either results in a tortuously-long viewing experience or allows other elements to shine - the latter occurs here.  There's no intro, we simply find that a simple man (Farrell) has been cut off by his long-time best friend (Gleeson) for no apparent reason.  Looks cruel and dull on paper, but the script and, especially, performances are so great that it is actually both hilarious and very affecting.  The relationship's turmoil turns darker as it goes - which I was a little disappointed with - but it's always, somehow, gripping.  Watch for Condon's brilliant Siobhan, too.

4. Amsterdam (Directed by David O. Russell; starring Christian Bale, John David Washington, Margot Robbie)

Just edging out Banshees for my favorite drama of the year is Amsterdam, the latest from acclaimed director Russell (Silver Linings Playbook, American Hustle, etc.).  Critics panned it (just 32% on RT) and while I see hints of why, I just plain disagree.  I'll admit the script can be a little shaky, at times a little too straightforward or simply awkward.  But the trio of characters at its core has great chemistry in a unique, touching, and fun relationship.  Christian Bale leads the way, doggedly caring for his fellow veterans yet not stuffily righteous; cranky, but in a lovable way.  Don't worry about following all the details of the wild plot - the movie has its heart in the right place, and in my view does a great job honoring veterans.  A lovely, memorable flute theme is a finishing touch for a really good movie.

3. Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (Directed by Sam Raimi; starring Benedict Cumberbatch, Elizabeth Olsen, Rachel McAdams)

Doctor Strange 2 turned out even better than its superhero sibling Thor, making for a great summer 2022 for Marvel.  In the tradition of Marvel's best movies, it somehow combines a number of different objectives - in plot, character, and overall narrative arc - in a tidy, cohesive, and thoroughly entertaining package.  Viewers of the standout WandaVision series are treated to a great follow-up storyline for her here, sharing the spotlight with the title character.  Wanda is now one of the best, and perhaps most tragic, of Marvel's superheroes.  The multiverse idea, exploding onto Marvel's path in Spider-Man 3 just months prior, is further developed in Doctor Strange's particular, mystical style.  It is a visual feast, filled with fun,  creative action, and a dose of horror (a Raimi specialty) sprinkled in appropriately.

2. Spirited (Directed by Sean Anders; starring Will Ferrell, Ryan Gosling, Octavia Spencer)

A movie I thought was streaming-only, I was pleasantly surprised when it came to my local theater.  A long-time Will Ferrell fan, I was eager to see if he could return to his glory days.  Well, this is a slightly different Ferrell than of old, but just as good, with a great assist from unexpected yet perfect partner Ryan Reynolds.  Spirited is essentially a modern retelling of A Christmas Carol; while that structure can lead to disastrous results, I thought the story was cleverly written and just as well executed.  I also thought I'd have to just tolerate the musical numbers, but they were great: well-performed, easy to follow (I can't make out what they're singing in many other musicals!), and just the right balance.  With Ferrell and Reynolds, it's really funny, of course, but the film's theme is genuinely warm, not cloying or cliched.  Surprising as it sounds, Ferrell now has two classic holidays movies!

1. Top Gun: Maverick (Directed by Joseph Kosinski; starring Tom Cruise, Miles Teller, Jennifer Connelly)

Although I've admired Tom Cruise's dedication in acting, particularly in recent Mission: Impossible movies, I thought that this sequel (thirty-six years after the original) would just be a harmless, disposable bit of summer fun.  Actually, it kind of is just that.  But it's also a stunning example of why there is simply no substitute for the movie theater.  The aerial scenes - from standard aircraft take-offs to intense dogfights - are just remarkable.  Like any good action movie, it ramps up the spectacle throughout.  The difference is that I thought, before the climax began, that they had already reached maximum velocity.  Um, nope.  The real-life stunt effects work pays off brilliantly, providing a visceral experience unlike any other, from both inside and outside the cockpit.  Maverick also holds its own back on the ground, though.  Cruise is, of course, the main reason why.  He exudes star power, yet his character is also fairly reserved, with some self-effacing humor, and is easy to root for.  Add in some solid co-stars and an authentically vintage style, and it's hard to remember whether you're in 1986 or 2022.  So Top Gun 2 won't win any dramatic awards.  But it is one of the very best blockbusters of the century.



Most Underrated Film of the Year: Amsterdam (runner up: Marvel movies-sort of)
I seemed to be on generally the same page as critics this year; almost all my top-ranked movies received at least overall favorable ratings.  This is probably just the Marvel fan in me, but I do note a growing disrespect, or at least indifferent attitude toward these films.  Yes, a lot of them have been made over the last fifteen years.  But they are almost all still high-quality, very entertaining movies, even if you haven't kept up with the others.
Amsterdam was the only glaring exception to my alignment with critics in 2022.  Browsing some of the headlines, it seems most found the plot too much and/or the tone too inconsistent.  I agree that there's a lot of plot, but I found it pretty easy to follow, and most of the details are inessential, anyway.  I also thought the balance of tones was pulled off really well.  To each their own, but I highly advise giving this a try. (available to stream on HBO Max!)

Most Overrated Film of the Year: Licorice Pizza (runner up: Devotion)
The premise of Devotion is very intriguing, particularly the two biggest (long-overlooked) historical elements in the desegregation of the armed forces and the Korean War.  But this movie completely wastes that potential, barely addressing the history.  What's more, the script is terrible, cliche and boring.  I would just keep rewatching Top Gun: Maverick before ever rewatching this one.
Licorice Pizza is technically a 2021 film, but it's the last of the movies that I'm categorizing in the year it was actually released in my theater.  It's astounding to me that this film was nominated for Best Picture, Director, and Original Screenplay at the Oscars, with a 91% on RT.  Once again, we start with a good premise, but the rest is a chaotic jumble of barely connected diversions which range from inexplicable and dull to gross (with the exception of one funny scene trying to escape in a van that's run out of gas).  Pass.

Most Surprisingly Good Film of the Year: Spirited (runner up: Violent Night)
I have to give this category to the holiday movie duo for 2022.  Violent Night is somehow both wild and yet also relatively restrained and sneakily consistent in its quality.  This is the anti-Christmas stereotype movie, with plenty of cynical, darker humor and a whole heap of smackdown; yet it still has the gall (and skill) to keep a cheery spirit!  That's what I call a Christmas miracle.
But the winner here has to be Spirited, and not just because it is my #2 movie of the year.  As soon as I learned that this starred both Will Ferrell and Ryan Reynolds, I knew I had to see it.  To be honest, though, I was very prepared for it to be a disaster, or at least, a boringly inoffensive throwaway that would barely register as a footnote in the two stars' filmographies.  Yet the take on A Christmas Carol is actually quite fresh and interesting; the musical numbers are inspired; and the comedic writing is high quality.  And you know that Ferrell and Reynolds bring it home.  I will definitely come back to this one in years to come.

Most Disappointing Film of the Year: Jurassic World Dominion (runner up: Glass Onion: A Knives Out Story)
Glass Onion is almost a perfect parallel to 2020/21's most disappointing movie, Wonder Woman 2.  Both are sequels to tremendous original movies, and they both fail largely by trying to go too big and almost completely abandoning the smaller charms that made the originals so successful.  Importantly, they were both also streaming-only releases (Wonder Woman 2 had the good excuse of the pandemic - but they could have just waited, like Bond did!) for movies that obviously should have gone to movie theaters.  The small screen just makes their flaws all the more glaring.
But Jurassic World Dominion is by far my biggest disappointment in 2022.  Jurassic Park is still my all-time favorite movie, and I didn't imagine Dominion would come anywhere close to it.  However, this is the worst of the six Jurassic movies.  The reunion of Alan Grant, Ellie Sattler, and Ian Malcolm (while each have a few good moments) shows just how creatively bankrupt the series had become.  2015's Jurassic World, while a much more fantasy-styled movie than the original, was at least well-made and fresh.  Dominion takes all the weaknesses of that style and blows them up to awful proportions; from ridiculous dino action scenes and bad CGI to quarter-hearted attempts at characters.  Ugh.

Worst Film of the Year: Black Adam
DC continues to be the superhero little brother to Marvel; the Dreamworks to Marvel's Pixar; the Pepsi to Marvel's Coca-Cola; the PC to Marvel's Mac; the Rolling Stones to Marvel's The Beatles; the... OK, I'll stop.  Black Adam is a perfect example of DC's hapless efforts to make superhero movies like Marvel - although even for DC, this is particularly bad.  There's just little that's positive to say about it; I guess it could serve as a nice distraction for young kids when you need it (although there are better options for that situation).  Dwayne Johnson has some acting talent, I'll admit it.  But he is still pretty dependent on good writing and directing to point him in the right direction.  When you just let his ego take off and don't give him any help, it's painful to watch.  The ending sets up a sequel - which I will not be watching.


Streaming Movies:
  • The Menu (A-):  This made my top-10 of the year, so I'm kicking myself for not going to see it in the theater.
  • Hustle (B+):  Adam Sandler put in another impressive dramatic acting performance, following Uncut Gems (an unpleasant film, but good acting).  It doesn't escape all the sports movie tropes, but this is definitely among the better ones, focusing on the behind-the-scenes effort to get an international star into the NBA.  Bonus points for NBA fans, with lots of cameos.
  • Elvis (B):  It's ridiculous that this got nominated for Best Picture; more so than Queen biopic Bohemian Rhapsody which was also a stretch.  Austin Butler does a nice Elvis impersonation, and it's entertaining.  But it's also LONG (like too many movies these days) and meandering, with much less effective character development than it thinks it has.
  • DC League of Super Pets (B):  A very kid-friendly animated superhero adventure that's also perfectly passable for adults.  Johnson and Hart continue to be a good comedic duo and Kate McKinnon is great as the villainous super-guinea pig.  It's also pretty forgettable, though.
  • Glass Onion: A Knives Out Story (B):  Although it's my disappointment of the year runner-up, Glass Onion isn't bad.  It is inventive and entertaining, but just too far out there and not as tightly made.  Daniel Craig's Benoit Blanc (aka "CSI: KFC") is also much less interesting this time.  Let's hope he's back to form with some better writing next time, and it's not just because the surprise factor is gone.
  • The Man From Toronto (B):  I'll be honest, I really don't remember this movie very well, but it was perfectly fun.  Hart and Harrelson made a good comedic combo.  If you need something purely entertaining for a night at home, this is a good choice.
  • Bullet Train (B-):  I considered seeing this in theaters, but the premise just seemed too derivative of other movies I've seen, plus I'm tired of Brad Pitt.  After seeing it at home by streaming, I'm glad I waited.  It's entertaining, sure, and digs into characters, or at least tries to, more than the action-packed trailers make it seem.  But the ending just goes entirely off the tracks, and there's little that distinguishes it from similar movies.

Other movies I saw in theaters in 2022:
I hope that you were able to watch and enjoy some of these movies in theaters last year.  And maybe I've convinced you to try some others at home (and to avoid others)!  Looking forward to more fun and moving experiences at the cinema in 2023.